mine was worse without one but a friend fixed his by removing his.?jem jem wrote:will change on weekend....
thanx shoul i try it without one>???
dont forget to put a small hole in the outer rim to let air through/ help flow.
Good find!Clanky wrote:Just saw this while at work (Outers is blocked) . Might be relevant to some peoples heat problems
http://www.exploroz.com/Forum/Topic/751 ... x%3fpn%3d2
I do mate (until I get the turbo fitted). I regularly tow a tandem trailer filled with premix or building materials or a transport trailer with a 2tonne digger. We've got some mean hills that the td42 won't pull these trailers on in 3rd cog. I find the best and easiest on the donk is in 2nd gear and hold it between 1800-2200rpm. It'll pull like a freight train all day in that range and won't overheat.fnqcairns wrote:Have many people actually driven an N/A td42? The low point where the max torque comes in is neither here nor there on this engine unless in low range towing tree trunks.....possibly, power higher up in the rev range is what makes the engine, don't miss out on it based on an assumption only, 3600 will do no harm ever and probably be kinder than lugging along spinning slow when there is no need.
The engine comes alive at about 3000 give or take a little and then thunders toward 3800-4K. How can that be given it's torque spec??
Disclaimer by thunders above i do mean the most impressive part of the engines power band is right here in 3rd gear, and by impressive I mean a td42 type level of impressive:)
Have you checked to see if the head is cracked best way to do this is to take the radiator cap off and then get it to operating temp if you are gettting bubbles in the water it's a bad sign if you do, or get a compression test to seejem jem wrote:Ok, yeterday was a hot hot day, driving home from work with air con on at first... warmed up to half, turned air off, was sitting in traffic M5.. warmed up just over half, got the shit took next exit.. put foot down, got to just under Hot, pulled up while my mate grabed a sixPac of Jimmis... crept up a little more.... could here a slight bubbling sound... drove of got back onto menagle road , cruiseing bout 80-100ks started to drop. got home and it was just over half.....!! so i think my factory gauge is ok. but why why why does she get warm.......!!!!
let me guess, fast water flow because of a missing thermostat harms cooling?? Always been a minor frustration whenever someone says that...goes against all the laws of physics...shoot we wouldn't even have TV or computers and still live under a bark roof if this held true in any way what's so ever.ANDREWGQ 351 wrote:on the pirate4x4.com home page they have a tech article describing all the cooling miths like thermostats, water amd air flows. makes a lot of sence and is opposite to what most so called experts say.
If you're implying that running no thermostat has no effect on an engine's operation - then i would have to say you are wrong. Not having the restriction/regulation (thermostat) usually makes the car run too cool, which is not a good thing.fnqcairns wrote:let me guess, fast water flow because of a missing thermostat harms cooling?? Always been a minor frustration whenever someone says that...goes against all the laws of physics...shoot we wouldn't even have TV or computers and still live under a bark roof if this held true in any way what's so ever.ANDREWGQ 351 wrote:on the pirate4x4.com home page they have a tech article describing all the cooling miths like thermostats, water amd air flows. makes a lot of sence and is opposite to what most so called experts say.
Only implying the physics, I keep reading where people use the idea that the water can travel too fast (in engine terms and because of the lack of a thermostat only and often related directly at TD4.2 engines) past a surface to absorb or give to a surface's heat somehow, the thermal conductivity of water doesn't work this way.coxy321 wrote:If you're implying that running no thermostat has no effect on an engine's operation - then i would have to say you are wrong. Not having the restriction/regulation (thermostat) usually makes the car run too cool, which is not a good thing.fnqcairns wrote:let me guess, fast water flow because of a missing thermostat harms cooling?? Always been a minor frustration whenever someone says that...goes against all the laws of physics...shoot we wouldn't even have TV or computers and still live under a bark roof if this held true in any way what's so ever.ANDREWGQ 351 wrote:on the pirate4x4.com home page they have a tech article describing all the cooling miths like thermostats, water amd air flows. makes a lot of sence and is opposite to what most so called experts say.
I'm not talking about the water moving too fast to absorb the heat from the water jacket surface (never even thought of it that way to be honest), but rather the flow of coolant cycling too fast and removing too much heat via its normal process.fnqcairns wrote:Only implying the physics, I keep reading where people use the idea that the water can travel too fast (in engine terms and because of the lack of a thermostat only and often related directly at TD4.2 engines) past a surface to absorb or give to a surface's heat somehow, the thermal conductivity of water doesn't work this way.coxy321 wrote:If you're implying that running no thermostat has no effect on an engine's operation - then i would have to say you are wrong. Not having the restriction/regulation (thermostat) usually makes the car run too cool, which is not a good thing.fnqcairns wrote:let me guess, fast water flow because of a missing thermostat harms cooling?? Always been a minor frustration whenever someone says that...goes against all the laws of physics...shoot we wouldn't even have TV or computers and still live under a bark roof if this held true in any way what's so ever.ANDREWGQ 351 wrote:on the pirate4x4.com home page they have a tech article describing all the cooling miths like thermostats, water amd air flows. makes a lot of sence and is opposite to what most so called experts say.
As long as a surface is contacted by water with all other perimeters remaining the same it doest care what speed the water is doing past it as it gives up it's heat.
In a close system the total effective heat budget stays the same irrespective of water speed alone and actually if water speed induces some turbulence instead of a more lamina flow then this can in effect aid absorption or dissipation.
makes sense to me, though i can see sense in thinking otherwise.Clanky wrote:SOunds interesting. The theory goes against what one would think to be correct, however your 'real world' testing seems to be on the money.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests