Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Free flowing intakes

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Perth

Free flowing intakes

Post by Z()LTAN »

Afternoon fellas.

Took the cruiser for a drive tonight for the first time with the new intake manifold/intercooler on. The intercooler doesn't have the coolant running through it yet either.

Id just like to say WOW... i thought the increased fill area would make it less responsive and have less power/torque at the same revs. But i was wrong, its more responsive and has alot more go than it did.

Just goes to show, playing with 'specifically engineered' intakes is awesome!

Dont know why im writing this but im just so surprised/happy!
Locktup4x4.com.au - For all of your hardcore gear

Outlaws4x4.com
Posts: 3740
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Licking a window near you

Post by 80's_delirious »

:cool: :cool: :cool:

good stuff mate! Got to love a good Scanas when you built something yourself :armsup:


How did you go with getting a different throttle cable?
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Z()LTAN »

Too right mate!

I got one made 350mm longer and modified the linkages to suit.

Works perfect !
Locktup4x4.com.au - For all of your hardcore gear

Outlaws4x4.com
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

Well done, I learnt the same when I upped my snorkel size from 3" to 4" the dyno results showed an impressive change :armsup:
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:44 am
Location: Perth

Post by pinkfloyddsotm »

good stuff tom
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Struth wrote:Well done, I learnt the same when I upped my snorkel size from 3" to 4" the dyno results showed an impressive change :armsup:
Imagine how good it'd be without a snorkle. :lol:
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

KiwiBacon wrote:
Struth wrote:Well done, I learnt the same when I upped my snorkel size from 3" to 4" the dyno results showed an impressive change :armsup:
Imagine how good it'd be without a snorkle. :lol:
It would be much better if it wasn't sucking hot extractor air from the engine bay.

Probably wouldn't cross rivers quite so well though :armsup:

But seriously it is currently running with the snorkel off for repairs and drawing air from the hole in the guard, not much different really, so I guess the 4" diameter is a good size for the length and the engines requirements.

In fact it didn't pull any more kw or Nm with the dyno fan pointed directly at a pod filter on a short intake tube to the MAF. So I don't need to imagine I know :D
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Post by sudso »

Struth wrote:Well done, I learnt the same when I upped my snorkel size from 3" to 4" the dyno results showed an impressive change :armsup:
What diameter is the throttle body butterfly on your 5.0?
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

sudso wrote:
Struth wrote:Well done, I learnt the same when I upped my snorkel size from 3" to 4" the dyno results showed an impressive change :armsup:
What diameter is the throttle body butterfly on your 5.0?
70mm from memory :D
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Post by sudso »

Hey Struth at the end of the day the results improved and thats what matters but it's interesting a 4" snorkel increased power over the 3" even though the throttle body further down the path is only about 2.75".
Have any other work done when you had it dyno'd?
So I'm wondering how a 3" intake was restricting airflow and power when it's gotta pass through the throttle body which is smaller again.
I mean in a vacuum situation the air required to fill a cylinder being sucked in by a piston through a small pipe would travel faster (as it has a smaller area to pass through) than being sucked through a large one, but the piston will still suck in the amount air it needs to fill the cylinder? I'm no airflow expert but I know that good air speed in the intake and manifold is needed for good low down torque.
We could say it's catching more air (if a larger snorkel head is fitted as well) but in reality the pistons would be sucking air in faster than it can be rammed in?

Any airflow/engine experts on here to explain the dynamics of all this?
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

sudso wrote:Hey Struth at the end of the day the results improved and thats what matters but it's interesting a 4" snorkel increased power over the 3" even though the throttle body further down the path is only about 2.75".
Have any other work done when you had it dyno'd?
So I'm wondering how a 3" intake was restricting airflow and power when it's gotta pass through the throttle body which is smaller again.
I mean in a vacuum situation the air required to fill a cylinder being sucked in by a piston through a small pipe would travel faster (as it has a smaller area to pass through) than being sucked through a large one, but the piston will still suck in the amount air it needs to fill the cylinder? I'm no airflow expert but I know that good air speed in the intake and manifold is needed for good low down torque.
We could say it's catching more air (if a larger snorkel head is fitted as well) but in reality the pistons would be sucking air in faster than it can be rammed in?

Any airflow/engine experts on here to explain the dynamics of all this?
The way I see it is you try and suck air through a 30cm water hose and the a 30m water hose. The less resistance a motor has at sucking air in the better.

Cris

Cris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:45 am
Location: Sailsbury-Brisbania

Post by JrZook »

ludacris wrote:
sudso wrote:Hey Struth at the end of the day the results improved and thats what matters but it's interesting a 4" snorkel increased power over the 3" even though the throttle body further down the path is only about 2.75".
Have any other work done when you had it dyno'd?
So I'm wondering how a 3" intake was restricting airflow and power when it's gotta pass through the throttle body which is smaller again.
I mean in a vacuum situation the air required to fill a cylinder being sucked in by a piston through a small pipe would travel faster (as it has a smaller area to pass through) than being sucked through a large one, but the piston will still suck in the amount air it needs to fill the cylinder? I'm no airflow expert but I know that good air speed in the intake and manifold is needed for good low down torque.
We could say it's catching more air (if a larger snorkel head is fitted as well) but in reality the pistons would be sucking air in faster than it can be rammed in?

Any airflow/engine experts on here to explain the dynamics of all this?
The way I see it is you try and suck air through a 30cm water hose and the a 30m water hose. The less resistance a motor has at sucking air in the better.

Cris

Cris
Correct. Gasflow does not only concern pipe diameter is also concerns the length of the pipe. So in essence your comparing a 70mm dia by say 50mm long restriction (the TB) to a 75mm by ~1.5m snorkel pipe.

Dan
Posts: 3740
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Licking a window near you

Post by 80's_delirious »

JrZook wrote:
ludacris wrote:
sudso wrote:Hey Struth at the end of the day the results improved and thats what matters but it's interesting a 4" snorkel increased power over the 3" even though the throttle body further down the path is only about 2.75".
Have any other work done when you had it dyno'd?
So I'm wondering how a 3" intake was restricting airflow and power when it's gotta pass through the throttle body which is smaller again.
I mean in a vacuum situation the air required to fill a cylinder being sucked in by a piston through a small pipe would travel faster (as it has a smaller area to pass through) than being sucked through a large one, but the piston will still suck in the amount air it needs to fill the cylinder? I'm no airflow expert but I know that good air speed in the intake and manifold is needed for good low down torque.
We could say it's catching more air (if a larger snorkel head is fitted as well) but in reality the pistons would be sucking air in faster than it can be rammed in?

Any airflow/engine experts on here to explain the dynamics of all this?
The way I see it is you try and suck air through a 30cm water hose and the a 30m water hose. The less resistance a motor has at sucking air in the better.

Cris

Cris
Correct. Gasflow does not only concern pipe diameter is also concerns the length of the pipe. So in essence your comparing a 70mm dia by say 50mm long restriction (the TB) to a 75mm by ~1.5m snorkel pipe.

Dan
eggzackery.

there is friction and the air will 'drag' along the inside of the snorkel slowing down the air flow, the longer it is, the more resistance to air flow.
Posts: 1040
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: yatala, halfway between brisbane and GC

Post by love ke70 »

what airbox and filter setup did you end up using?

looking at doing my intercooler over the next couple of weekends :)

just trying to work out the best watertight method i can, and then working out how to stop rain filling it up :?
97 GQ patrol coilcab. TD42, safari turbo kit with fiddled turbo, D-GAS kit. dyno results to come...
4inch lift, king springs, efs and procomp shocks
315/70R16 cooper ST's
found fuel economy...
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

:D :D :D

Geez I didn't even have to go into the whys, but volume plays a big part in it :armsup:

The dyno showed peak power at plus 4rwkw, however it now occurs at 4200 rpm as opposed to 4800 rpm.

It also gave me 20% more power at 2000 rpm.

The torque curve remained flat but increased slightly, which I think is simply a characteristic of the VT 304.

Cheers
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests