Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
GT2876 on a 105 1hz
Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX
GT2876 on a 105 1hz
Hey
Just wondering if anyone else has strapped one of these on a 105 1hz?
Cheers
Just wondering if anyone else has strapped one of these on a 105 1hz?
Cheers
yer i put one on my 80, makes 10 pound at 2000 RPM not max fuel but gets hot on long climbs coss of no cooler, will be putting more in when i get the cooler on.
mine has a 1HDT manafold with an adaptor flange made but Matt McInnes. all bolted up very well, here is some picks
and the flange made by matt
mine has a 1HDT manafold with an adaptor flange made but Matt McInnes. all bolted up very well, here is some picks
and the flange made by matt
Above Pic
Top left T25-T3
Top Right CT26-T25 as is Ducks
Bottom Left T3-T4
Bottom Right CT26-T3
All 14mm thick 3D CNC/CAD smooth blending radius between the flange faces.
Also have a CT20-T25 on the drawing board for 22R-TE I think it is.
Drop me a PM if you need one.
Top left T25-T3
Top Right CT26-T25 as is Ducks
Bottom Left T3-T4
Bottom Right CT26-T3
All 14mm thick 3D CNC/CAD smooth blending radius between the flange faces.
Also have a CT20-T25 on the drawing board for 22R-TE I think it is.
Drop me a PM if you need one.
http://www.fj40-2f-eti-locked-n-loaded.com
Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Advanced (HB) Intercoolers
http://advancedhbintercoolers.com
Turbo cost me about $1320
3" Exhaust with twin tips was $1250 bout a $1000 with single tip
Labor was about $1000
My fuel hasn't been touched from the previous DTS kit tune and i get a strong 7psi, EGT's stay below 500 aswell. Was towing about 2.4t yesterday and even under full load it was still under 500..
Shoot me a PM if you want to know more Paul.
Dan
3" Exhaust with twin tips was $1250 bout a $1000 with single tip
Labor was about $1000
My fuel hasn't been touched from the previous DTS kit tune and i get a strong 7psi, EGT's stay below 500 aswell. Was towing about 2.4t yesterday and even under full load it was still under 500..
Shoot me a PM if you want to know more Paul.
Dan
The only reason i really changed turbos is the TD05 DTS turbo shat itself... only 5 year old too. After investigating it more, i found it would cheaper and more reliable if i were to by a new turbo in the long term. Which then bought me to speak to Zoltan on this forum about his setup.. so then i just got that. He, naturally, runs lots more boost and has an unreal ICooler too..
Any idea how the GT2876 would compare to the GT2860 and GT2871 on a 1HZ?Feass wrote:i got mine back today, got a gt2876 on a 105 1hz with 220 on the clock. i had a dts kit on it and i was piece of shit. this unit makes a shit load more power, earlier and stronger, on 7psi and a 3" than the dts did on 15psi....
From reading other comments, it seems like the smaller GT2860 might be a better choice to spool up lower in the limited rev range of the 1HZ.
I really don't know anything about them myself.
But from reading about them, I thought that a smaller AR would give faster spool up at lower revs...
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobyga ... onyms.html
Like Feass, I'd like better performance than my DTS setup is giving me, something that kicks in and pulls hard before 2000-2200 rpm like the DTS Mitsubishi TD05 does.
But from reading about them, I thought that a smaller AR would give faster spool up at lower revs...
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobyga ... onyms.html
Turbine A/R - Turbine performance is greatly affected by changing the A/R of the housing. Turbine A/R is used to adjust the flow capacity of the turbine. Using a smaller A/R will increase the exhaust gas velocity into the turbine wheel, causing the wheel to spin faster at lower engine RPMs giving a quicker boost rise. This will also tend to increase exhaust backpressure and reduce the max power at high RPM. Conversely, using a larger A/R will lower exhaust gas velocity and delay boost rise, but the lower backpressure will give better high-RPM power. When deciding between A/R options, be realistic with the intended vehicle use and use the A/R to bias the performance toward the desired powerband.
Like Feass, I'd like better performance than my DTS setup is giving me, something that kicks in and pulls hard before 2000-2200 rpm like the DTS Mitsubishi TD05 does.
I spent loooots of time talking to Zoltan about heaps of different setups and it all came back to the 2876RS.. and i dont look back.
There is one hill that i could never get up in third, and because there is a tight bend at the bottom, you couldnt get more than 40kph run up, now i can hit it in third at 30kph and make it up with out an issue at all! the amout of torque increase is amazing. the TD05 may be good for a 2.0 petrol but not for a 4.2 diesel..
There is one hill that i could never get up in third, and because there is a tight bend at the bottom, you couldnt get more than 40kph run up, now i can hit it in third at 30kph and make it up with out an issue at all! the amout of torque increase is amazing. the TD05 may be good for a 2.0 petrol but not for a 4.2 diesel..
I don't doubt that it goes great on Zoltan's truck, with big boost, intercooler (and possibly heavy right foot) like he has, I am just wondering if it is the best choice for a daily driver running less boost, with much more km's and looking for a little more longevity that what is required for a low km comp style truck.
From reading turbo definitions, it seems like a smaller AR is better for more boost quickly at lower revs.
Your setup seems to increase performance for you, over the standard DTS setup, but it could possibly have even less lag, and even better low rev performance, with a smaller AR turbo than what Zoltan chooses for his application.
It seems like it would be a tradeoff between low revs response/longevity and max power, but maybe someone like Zoltan is looking for max power and high revs, and maybe not necessarily considering low rev performance/lag.
I don't know myself, just asking the questions, which I suppose can only be really answered by someone that really knows what they are talking about in turbo theory, or has actually compared the options on the same engine.
From reading turbo definitions, it seems like a smaller AR is better for more boost quickly at lower revs.
Your setup seems to increase performance for you, over the standard DTS setup, but it could possibly have even less lag, and even better low rev performance, with a smaller AR turbo than what Zoltan chooses for his application.
It seems like it would be a tradeoff between low revs response/longevity and max power, but maybe someone like Zoltan is looking for max power and high revs, and maybe not necessarily considering low rev performance/lag.
I don't know myself, just asking the questions, which I suppose can only be really answered by someone that really knows what they are talking about in turbo theory, or has actually compared the options on the same engine.
The definitions seem to suggest that smaller AR is better for low revs.Z()LTAN wrote:The GT2876R , 71 and 60 all have the same turbine choices, the 76R is the only one with the huge .70 compressor ar, 4" inlet and 2.5" outlet. Thus flowing more air at lower revs, thus producing a quicker and more intense boost rise.
It seems to make sense, less air required to get the turbo spinning, which is what you have at lower revs, but then a greater restriction at higher revs, for less maximum power.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests