Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Tech Talk for Cruiser owners.

Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX

Post Reply
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: deception bay, QLD

100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by builtlux88 »

hey guys just lookin at buying a 4.5 efi petrol 100 series 2000 model just wondering how bad they are on fuel

any info appreciated
1n106 coil'd, 39.5 iroks, locked, bobbed, tubbed, dovetaild, highsteer and heavy right(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:28 pm
Location: Fixing something else the kids have broken

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by BadMav »

Lot's, even a well tuned one. My brother IL has one but it's dual fuel, he says the power is not much different but the gas system is top of the range. Can find out more info if you like.
Don't take life too seriously...it isn't permanent.
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by falco80 »

They are pretty thirsty, but are a tough reliable engine. You have to remember it's moving almost 3 tonnes of cruiser around....but it does a great job of that. When my old 80 was loaded up and we were pushing it hard in the sand i reckon i could see the fuel needle drop. It's a big six though, with great power from idle. If fuel economy is your thing maybe look into LPG or get a diesel. ;)
Dan
1979 BJ40
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by oldmate »

I rekon you'd be getting 20 on average in a 105. I best about 18 in my 80 (which is lighter)

You can gas them, but the head needs to be in top shape. About 3 grands worth drive in and out.

Unless you want the solid front axle, get the v8. much better engine, and works better on a proper gas injection system.
The worst part about being told you have Alzheimer's, is that it doesn't just happen once.
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by evanstaniland »

oldmate wrote:I rekon you'd be getting 20 on average in a 105. I best about 18 in my 80 (which is lighter)

You can gas them, but the head needs to be in top shape. About 3 grands worth drive in and out.

Unless you want the solid front axle, get the v8. much better engine, and works better on a proper gas injection system.
ive had gas on my 4.5 petrol 105 for 2 years now and no head issues and i did nothing to them. only costs i have indured was i killed a mixer (the seals died and i got the new one machined to get better flow at appropriate RPM. i get 350-400kms out of 100L LPG costs about $60-70 to fill up.
they are thursty as all hell and just the same on fuel.

Evan
www.energizedracing.com
Support from:
Locktup 4x4
Arb Newcastle
Genr8 LED lighting
Yukon Gear & Axle
Overkill Engineering
Ruffstuff Specialties
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: wollongong

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by Stackson45 »

My 105 last test run was 270kms/70L gas (approx 26L/100), and my 75 ute was 25L/100. I haven't done a petrol/100km test in the 105, but the ute gets approx 16L/100.

These are good mostly highway figures, the 105 seems to not chew too much more gas around town, though the ute definitely uses more gas around town.
Landcruiser UTE 1996 FZJ75 - SPOA, 35"s,
extended chassis, poor mans extra cab, 4.56 diff gears, Lockright front, chinese air locker rear...
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:41 pm
Location: sydney

Re: 100 series 4.5 petrol fuel use

Post by schmik »

My 105 manual gives me 18L/100km on the highway and 20 around town.
Best ever was 17.5L/100. That was cruising at 100kph. Worst was about 25 but that was really stomping it.

Thirsty buggers but have good power and a much lower price than the diesels.

Mike
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests