Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

comp truggy engine choice

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: bunbury

comp truggy engine choice

Post by troopy94 »

Hi everyone I have a suzuki based truggy that's running a series 2 commodore v6 with the turbo 700 auto and while it has great low down grunt and gearing I would like to go to a lighter motor and gearbox package. I'd like to stick with an auto but want to drop a heap of weight from over the front axle. It is running twin nissan transfers for the reduction but I have a spare zook case with 6.5 gears which can be used with the new engine gearbox combo. What would peoples opinions be on the best combo for reasonable power but at a realistic weight any advice would be greatly appreciated

cheers troopy
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 3:19 pm
Location: north england

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by dr who? »

how about a vitara v6 with autobox with your zook case behind that?
light and rev to the moon :armsup:
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: serpintine wa

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by hillbilliywheelchair »

dr who? wrote:how about a vitara v6 with autobox with your zook case behind that?
light and rev to the moon :armsup:
mm nice

other wise theirs heap of alloy 4's 6's and 8's out their
thanks jono
Skip 1995 tdi disco the new tourer
Tin Worn the scat crawler with charade (fwd) motor and auto patroll transfer and locked yota diffs all for under $1000
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: bunbury

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by troopy94 »

I'm thinking an alloy 4 cylinder would be the best for weight and then hopefully i could shift it back further in the engine bay for better weight distribution
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: on top of a large pile of rocks

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by AFeral »

Suzuki v6 is a nice engine compact, powerful and light, only problem its a revy engine with most of its power in the mid and high range. Not much low down where you need it for rock crawling. Would have thought a suzuki 1.6litre or 2 litre would be a good choice.
Anything is possible, it just comes down to time and money.
Ferals build www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic164570.php
Van-tastic!
Posts: 6107
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:22 pm
Location: .."I MIGHT NOT AGREE WITH WHAT YOU SAY, BUT ILL DEFEND YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT".

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by St Jimmy »

Twin turbo rotary :armsup:
slugs are just snails that sold their belongings for drug money

Dream as if you'll live forever, live like you'll die today.
Powered by Pals, Motivated by Mates.
God of Athiests
Posts: 8336
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by DamTriton »

Why not be the first on the block with an electric powerplant

http://bev.com.au/spare_part/#DIY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.azuredynamics.com/products/f ... tSheet.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

~$2100 for batteries (40 AH x 40, for 60kg)
~$2900 for motor (38kg)
~$3600 controller (15kg)
~$1000 battery management (5kg)

Yeah, $10g or so but a system that's different, inherently has bags of torque down low, small and light (120kg all up) and easy to arrange the CoG where you wanted it. Use your Zook case or dual lux cases straight up to the motor for gearing (essentially set and forget though) one at 4.7:1 the other at standard 2.2:1 would give a good spread with 3.7:1-3.9:1 diffs

If you looked at it seriously it would be one hell of a publicity machine and could do the sport a huge favour.

You could up the battery voltage from ~150 to ~180 for an additional 8 cells and 12 kg, or simply go as high as you want right up to 330 volts if you have room and can or want to carry the extra weight for extra endurance.

You may need to factor in a 1-2kW generator on you truck to charge between rounds.
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: bunbury

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by troopy94 »

Thankyou everyone for the ideas and the electric option is very interesting but I'm not sure if they will allow an electric powered vehicle in rock crawling events or even in tufftruck as that is my ultimate goal for the zook. I currently run the v6 on straight gas and would do the same with whatever motor goes in so it doesn't have to be an injected engine. I have another zook as a daily driver with a 1.6 but I feel that it isn't enough for the truggy so around 90 to 100 kw would be ideal with the right gearing.
Posts: 837
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:41 pm
Location: out playin

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by stock 4runner »

just helped a mate do a 4agze to vitara auto and transfer.
Rims flipped from $50
God of Athiests
Posts: 8336
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by DamTriton »

troopy94 wrote:Thankyou everyone for the ideas and the electric option is very interesting but I'm not sure if they will allow an electric powered vehicle in rock crawling events or even in tufftruck as that is my ultimate goal for the zook. I currently run the v6 on straight gas and would do the same with whatever motor goes in so it doesn't have to be an injected engine. I have another zook as a daily driver with a 1.6 but I feel that it isn't enough for the truggy so around 90 to 100 kw would be ideal with the right gearing.
Don't laugh, but have a look at a Sportage driveline.

Auto available, 2 litre, 1.98:1 low if you use stock Tcase. Fairly compact from the fan to the firewall (600mm), assuming you are using a rear mounted radiator, less than that. Strong bottom end (crank originally from a diesel) Whole D/line is within 15mm of the length of a Commo V6/4L60E/Marks adapter/Hilux Tcase.

Full name: Mazda FE3N

---------

As for the electric option, test the waters with the organisers, you'll never know if you don't ask, and it would help to "green" our sport, which I don't think would be lost on them.
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Jamisiontown NSW

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by MARKx4 »

What about a 2.7 hilux motor, auto box if they come with one and transfer case? All stock parts from the hilux and bolt together with no adaptors which makes spares cheaper and easier to get if something goes wrong.

Mark.
Its not cool, unless it's got boost :)
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: bunbury

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by troopy94 »

What would be the weight difference be between the commo v6 and the 2.7 hilux motor? I have read a bit about the 2.7 or 3rz I think it's called and it seems they are quite a grunty motor for a 4cylinder but my navie wants me to put a 2.6 pajero motor in it with magna injection but I'm worried it would be too much for the zook transfer.
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: serpintine wa

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by hillbilliywheelchair »

not the 2.6 astron its also found in canter trucks sigmas and forklifts

thought about the volvo v6 (all alloy)
or even the rover v8 comes with a brilliant transfer case
both real cheap options
thanks jono
Skip 1995 tdi disco the new tourer
Tin Worn the scat crawler with charade (fwd) motor and auto patroll transfer and locked yota diffs all for under $1000
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

sr20, all alloy 2.0lt motor either turbo or na.
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by redzook »

troopy94 wrote:. I have another zook as a daily driver with a 1.6 but I feel that it isn't enough for the truggy so around 90 to 100 kw would be ideal with the right gearing.
how big of tires you running ?? what terrain? my 1.6 has plenty of go , this years tuff truck winner has a 1.6L, power comes second to suspension design unless of course your a mud bogger
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Rockingham W A

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by duncan »

2liter zuk motor or 3rz only thing with the 3rz when I looked into it was a bit pricey to by compared to como motor thats the only reason I went that way.3rz should be heaps lighter just over 100kw and is built for a 4x4 so no crank angle sensor out the front were they get full of crap and break.
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: bunbury

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by troopy94 »

I'm running 38 in tsl swampers at the moment with a tyre change to 40 stickies soon, the diffs are 60 series front diffs with rear steer and dirty 30s all round. It is pretty heavy with quite alot of barwork so would guess it to be around the 1700 plus kg mark and I'm thinking the 3rz sounds like a great motor for it since it was built to push around a 4x4 of a similar weight
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by Guy »

troopy94 wrote:I'm running 38 in tsl swampers at the moment with a tyre change to 40 stickies soon, the diffs are 60 series front diffs with rear steer and dirty 30s all round. It is pretty heavy with quite alot of barwork so would guess it to be around the 1700 plus kg mark and I'm thinking the 3rz sounds like a great motor for it since it was built to push around a 4x4 of a similar weight

What are your optiopns of putting the whole truck on a diet ?
replace some tube with smaller diameter or thinner wall section (non critical of couse) Alloy links , alloy rims etc etc
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by sierrajim »

Another vote for the 3RZ from me.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 4225
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: sunshine coast australia

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by mud4b »

Suzuki jimny 13bb or m15a with a holden 3 speed auto behind it and sierra transfer. This is what i will be using once again when i build my buggy.

cheers mark.
Mud4b/ OPT, Cheap rates, Not cheap work. Search Opt- option offroad on facebook. Call or Sms 0439609525.. Sunshine coast, Eudlo, 4554.
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

3rz aint much lighter than a v6, still a cast iron block and a big 4cyl one at that.
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Rockingham W A

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by duncan »

Not 100% but was pretty sure late model 3rz is all alloy or go a injected 1.6 with a little hair dryer strapped on it
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: sydney

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by micka1 »

i'd be interested also in the weight difference of a 3rz to v6 holden . as this is the way i almost went until i picked up a v6 and auto with complete car for $50 :rofl: .
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

na 3rz's are cast iron, dont get me wrong there a great motor its just he stated light weight and u can get lighter than a cast iron 2.7lt 4cyl
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by sierrajim »

johnsy86 wrote:3rz aint much lighter than a v6, still a cast iron block and a big 4cyl one at that.
It's also similar power to the V6 commo motor and easier to fit in a small engine bay.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

why not for light weight and power, sr20 turbo, powerglide to lux transfer?
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:16 pm
Location: Nth Richmond. NSW

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by Black Bull »

Glides have quite a high first gear
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

love_mud wrote:
troopy94 wrote:I'm running 38 in tsl swampers at the moment with a tyre change to 40 stickies soon, the diffs are 60 series front diffs with rear steer and dirty 30s all round. It is pretty heavy with quite alot of barwork so would guess it to be around the 1700 plus kg mark and I'm thinking the 3rz sounds like a great motor for it since it was built to push around a 4x4 of a similar weight

What are your optiopns of putting the whole truck on a diet ?
replace some tube with smaller diameter or thinner wall section (non critical of couse) Alloy links , alloy rims etc etc
i think this would be a good idea also, and if not powerglide maybe a 6l80e or turbo700 or c4 theres a few to choose from, just some ideas.
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Rockingham W A

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by duncan »

Nice to fit a motor that was designed for a 4x4 not a car as I love my como v6 had 2 of them but the crank angle sensor sucks right at the front were they break easy when you drop them in some mud thats course full of tiny little rocks.

Im running a r151 manual what other manuals are out there to suit some of these motors could you use the box from a sr20 is it strong enough and what is first gear like ratio wise.
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:06 am
Location: gold coast

Re: comp truggy engine choice

Post by johnsy86 »

got no idea on other manuals for this motor Duncan. Id run an auto, the whole idea of running this motor would be cause its light weight. whichs is what he asked for a light weight motor, i wouldnt run this motor in anything other than a zook or buggy because of its small capacity only 2lts.
Lj80 tuff truck "mr Grumpy"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests