Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Gold Coast

Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by DanwinGQ »

Hey all,
I have a question to do with Fuel consumption and the affect of manual locking hubs.
I've recently replaced the auto hubs on my GU patrol with manual hubs and was wondering if anyone knows if this will improve the fuel economy of my thirsty 4.5?
I know with the landcruser (constant 4wd) fitting manual hubs to disengage the front diff will improve the fuel economy.
Will fitting manual hubs to the patrol also be an improvement or do the auto hubs fully disengage the front diff the same as manual hubs do anyway??
Thirsty GU. TI, 4", 33's, factory locker.
Posts: 470
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:21 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by 351ciofgrunt »

No difference
GQ Patrol Wagon, 6 point roll cage
351 cleveland, CHI heads, solid cam, Funnelweb single plane, 750 HP DP
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by oldmate »

351ciofgrunt wrote:No difference
x2

Don't Gu's come with an auto/locking hub that can be set to auto, or fully locked?

DanwinGQ wrote:Hey all,

I know with the landcruser (constant 4wd) fitting manual hubs to disengage the front diff will improve the fuel economy.

It's not measurable. It's marketing crap.
The worst part about being told you have Alzheimer's, is that it doesn't just happen once.
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:11 am
Location: Maitland, NSW

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by Jcas24 »

maybe 0.00001L/100km better
'91 Toyota Surf SSR Ltd. 2.4 TD Auto, Coil SAS, Duals, 4.88, Longs w/ front ARB, 35" MTRs
'97 Toyota Surf SSR-G Intercooled 3.0 TD Auto. 2" lift, Xrox bar, Waeco, Drawers, 32" BFGs
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by DanwinGQ »

yeah didnt think so either. My mechanic seemed to think it would help.
The auto hubs are auto or they can be locked manually.
Thirsty GU. TI, 4", 33's, factory locker.
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by thehanko »

They are totally different cars one is full time 4wd and one is part time 4wd? not the same boat!

To save fuel on a 4500 you need to remove the gravitational pull of your foot to the fire wall, drive less or change engines not much else will do much unfortunately, every change will be small.
do you run roadies or muds?
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by oldmate »

Which would save more fuel: A part time kit; or a hiclone?
The worst part about being told you have Alzheimer's, is that it doesn't just happen once.
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:45 pm
Location: SYDNEY

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by thehanko »

oldmate wrote:Which would save more fuel: A part time kit; or a hiclone?
I cant believe you even think its a contest!
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:33 am
Location: BUNDY

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by RIZZO »

sadly i agree it wouldn't have any effect being auto or manual hubs, if you want to make your 4.5 cheaper to run simply gas it or get rid of it, I'm on the same boat as you mate owning a 4.8 ,
Posts: 1256
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:05 pm
Location: newzealand

Re: Fuel consumption. Auto VS Man Hubs

Post by tweak'e »

i think you got auto hubs mixed up with no hubs.
autos should be unlocked when your on tarseal so its exactly the same as a manual hub unlocked. knowing that people forget to unlock manual hubs means auto have a very slight adavantage (assuming they are working properly).

some part time 4x4's have no hubs ie the shafts rotate even when in 2wd (eg some navaras). fitting manual hubs often gain about 1 litre per 100km/s. even vehicles with ADD (diff disconnect) gain fuel economy, less wear on tires and CV's.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests