Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

82 sierra or 92??

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: QLD...Where else would you want to live??

82 sierra or 92??

Post by Whitey »

Hey Guys, just joined up today and already got a question for ya. I've been looking for a good sierra for a few weeks now, and have found two. One is a stock 92 model the other is a 82 model with a 1600 motor in it and a few other mods. The 92 is $4000, and the 82 is $2900. I mainly want to use it for beach work as I live near Fraser Island and was wondering what one you thought would be better to get. The main concern I have is that the 82 is only a 4 spd and I'm thinking a 5 spd would be better for the beach driving. Any opionions would be appreciated.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

what sort of 1600 is in it, a corolla motor ??? if it is .. I would probarbly go the 92 model ...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: NW Sydney, NSW

Sierras

Post by Impulsive »

I wouldn't have thought u'd really have a call for 5th gear on a patrolled beach anyway, but the advantage of a 5-speed would be that the ratios are a bit closer together anyway I guess..

I'd go the '92, unless the 1600 was a 4A-GE or something funky like that, but even then, u may have to take into account the type of driving you'll be doing, and the revs that the twin cam (if that's what it is) needs to develop power, ie; 4000rpm+....
1998 Vitara Hard Top 2.0 EFI
65mm springs (by Allsprings)
35mm body lift
Rancho RS9000's
235's on 15in alloys
Flipped strut mounts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: QLD...Where else would you want to live??

Post by Whitey »

It is a 1600 nissan motor, not sure of the exact model though(will find out on weekend) but by the way the guy selling it is talking both the car and the motor need a bit of work done to them, so I'm kinda swaying to the 92 model..
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

i vote 92
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 7:32 pm
Location: Townsville

Post by Toos »

go the 92
4 Pot Screama
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

Go the 92, you cant beat boosted brakes
yeshemesh
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

bigsteve wrote:Go the 92, you cant beat boosted brakes

Not to mention those wide track diffs, oh bugger I just mentioned them :oops:
Peter.
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 6:02 pm
Location: Boomtown

Post by becky »

droopypete wrote:
bigsteve wrote:Go the 92, you cant beat boosted brakes

Not to mention those wide track diffs, oh bugger I just mentioned them :oops:
Peter.


Chuckle :lol:
If we can put one man on the moon, why can't we put them all there!!
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

Go the 92, think about the age difference overall, everything is 10 years newer! (diffs/box engine etc) Body for signs of rust?
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests