Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

top ten 4wd

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply

what do you think is the best 4wd made


landrover
93
16%
toyota
168
29%
nissan
163
28%
suzuki
80
14%
jeep
77
13%
 
Total votes: 581

Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 1:34 am
Location: QLD

Post by Jeeps »

grimbo wrote:If you did the same to a stock TJ with aftermarket parts you would be ahead $$ wise and performance wise.


Dribble...dribble...dribble dude wipe that shit from the corner of your mouth!
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Land Rover made the first mass produced civillian 4x4 back in 1948 (admittedly it was based on the WW1 jeep) - then Jeep, Toyota, Nissan and everyone else copied them.

Then they built the Range Rover - the first of the 'non agricultural' (read comfortable) 4x4's - as Tom said with coils and discs all round - the best suspension travel for a stock 4x4, power steering, and a nice light, powerful V8. ALL THE WAY BACK IN 1969!!! At a time when All toyota and nissan offered were agricultural 'trucks' with leaves and drums all round and metal dashboards.

Land Rover was also the first to introduce a direct injection diesel in a passenger 4x4 - the ISUZU 4BD1 in 1981!!! Followed by the Tdi in 1989. Then the first (AFAIK) to introduce a common rail diesel, in 2000.

They also put a D60 (Salisbury) in their vehicles in 1971 - again long before any passenger 4x4 - the US are only just catching up. Only trucks like the F250 get D60's.

So how much mre proof do you want that they did everything first and everyone copied them. The only thing they weren't first at was inventing the "soft" 4x4's like the Rav4 - but I think not being the first with a pathetic excuse for a 4x4 like that is an achievement also.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

hey you jeepers. post up a link to the "rally up" thread on your forum. :lol:
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

N*A*M wrote:hey you jeepers. post up a link to the "rally up" thread on your forum. :lol:


http://ausjeepoffroad.com/forum/viewtop ... sc&start=0
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Wendle wrote:i reckon toyota for refinement,
nissan for outright strength,
suzuki for cheapness & disposability,
jeep for bolt-on-bandit ability,
and rover for social status, darling. :finger:


I agree with wendle, thats awesome!!!

W00t

Wendle is the weiner!!! :armsup:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

RaginRover wrote:
droopypete wrote:
Rainbow Warrior wrote:
turps wrote:
N*A*M wrote:land rover!

who else had an all coil, v8, power-steering beast in the early 70s?


Dosent mean they got it right though..


Didn't they? Took Nissan & Toyota till the mid eighties to get some of those features, such as 4 wheel discs & AWD, and Toyota still can't make a decent AWD system.

Don't you mean early 80's?
Peter.


What was the first coil sprung, full time 4x4 with discs all round from Toyota, thought it was in 1989 - nissan even beat you ... 1987 that is late 80s in my book

Tom


1985, japanese bundera!! :lol:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

:lol:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

grimbo wrote:Actualy the G Wagen is pretty amazing stock, front and rear selectable lockers, a great engine, coil sprung live axles and probably the ugliest body shape. Good pickup Pete.

They are a WEAPON and geared pretty low aswell. :armsup:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Dembones wrote:That is correct. Jeeps in general have the lowest stock T-case ratio of any light truck. I'm not going to bash the other brands, I've seen incredible things out of all of them.

Heard of a LANDROVER? They ALL have 3.3:1 low range totally standard.

(I know, I couldn't believe it myself when I was told!!)

I think the lowest STOCK transfer case gearing award belongs to the poms on this one :idea: :armsup:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Drafty wrote:
DirtPigs wrote:Spot the Toyota... :D :finger: :armsup:


Image



The above pic was taken at the Outback Challenge a few days ago.

No need to say any more in my opinion, the picture sais it all, you can stick your pole and all your new user names where the sun dont shine. :finger: :D


the nissan with its bonnet up??? (Just jokes)

nice pic, i notice a few rangies and some patrols. :cool:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

what do you think is the best 4wd made

landrover
10% [ 23 ]
toyota
21% [ 47 ]
nissan
19% [ 41 ]
suzuki
22% [ 48 ]
jeep
25% [ 55 ]

Total Votes : 214

Nice poll!
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Ruff I would come over to the jeep site and back you up, but 1: you dont need it!! (Cause you're not weak) and 2:I think my IP is blocked, or my username expired or something. :cry:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

moving this to chit chat :cool:
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

Wendle wrote:i reckon toyota for refinement,
nissan for outright strength,
suzuki for cheapness & disposability,
jeep for bolt-on-bandit ability,
and rover for social status, darling. :finger:


I don't think I'd say Toyota = Refinement....probably boring reliability ;)

But overall I think you've summed it up best......
No ya all's know I'm a jeep nut - but there is noway I'd claim the Tj Rubicon to bethe most capable stock 4bee ever - that's just a silly call - there are quite a few rigs that were "stock" with dual lockers etc...

Besides even if the rubi was available here I'd probably not buy it....the unlimited (LWB TJ) however I'd like a lot more :D
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:29 pm
Location: Brisney Land

Post by Thor »

Wooders wrote:
Wendle wrote:i reckon toyota for refinement,
nissan for outright strength,
suzuki for cheapness & disposability,
jeep for bolt-on-bandit ability,
and rover for social status, darling. :finger:


I don't think I'd say Toyota = Refinement....probably boring reliability ;)

But overall I think you've summed it up best......
No ya all's know I'm a jeep nut - but there is noway I'd claim the Tj Rubicon to bethe most capable stock 4bee ever - that's just a silly call - there are quite a few rigs that were "stock" with dual lockers etc...

Besides even if the rubi was available here I'd probably not buy it....the unlimited (LWB TJ) however I'd like a lot more :D

Spot on wooders! i can't agree that a toyota is refined. but the rest is pretty much it - nice one wendle!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

ROFL!!!

Wooders, always the calm, level-headed jeeper!!

anyways, almost had 10 in a row!!
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

Rainbow Warrior wrote:Did'n't Bundera's have IFS? And what would be mid 80's then?


No mate, they where solid axle coils.
Peter.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

Rainbow Warrior wrote:And I said some.


That is corect, if you hadn't said this I wouldn't have posted, as the Bundera never had a V8 standard in the early 80's, and my post count would be about 25 less :lol:
Peter.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

Rainbow Warrior wrote:I suspect you are slightly deluded as to the power output of a stock Bunderra.
:lol:

Yes you may be right, I have been typing so much, there are these horrid green fumes comming off my key board :D
But I am very happy with the way my Bundera goes, it is a ripper.
Peter.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

bj on roids wrote:1985, japanese bundera!! :lol:


Sorry BJ 1984.
Peter.
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

I think the best thing to come from this, (apart from some stimulating debate) is the O/Limits membership boost.
Maybe we should have a poll next week along the lines of "DO SISSYS DRIVE JEEPS", think of people all around the world who will join up just to defend themselves :D
The following week it will be Toyota's, then Nissans ect ect, dont bother with Suzuki's, we are used to being called sissys :lol:
Peter
ps I still only voted once. :)
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:38 pm
Location: Darwin

Post by Sixty »

Drafty wrote:
Sixty wrote:I thought there would be more than eleven cars competing.........? :finger: :D


Thats a clever reply :roll: :silly:


Derrr :? Another words, your telling us that the arent any other types of 4wd competing in the OBC?
Luv the sound of a diesel,
especially a Chev 6.2!
Its GONE.........Replaced by a qik HDJ105.

The bigger the boy, the bigger the TOY!!
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:19 pm
Location: BALDIVIS WA

Post by WOLF »

DROOPYPETE,
RE "Do Sissies Drive Jeeps".
As you mensioned JEEPERS from all around the world would jump on and defend themslves.
And guess what? You would be HEAVELY out numbered M8!
The Jeeps Unlimeted forum has THOUSANDS of members who would jump on over to debate the issue.......could be very interesting dont you think?
:twisted:
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

WOLF wrote:DROOPYPETE,
RE "Do Sissies Drive Jeeps".
As you mensioned JEEPERS from all around the world would jump on and defend themslves.
And guess what? You would be HEAVELY out numbered M8!
The Jeeps Unlimeted forum has THOUSANDS of members who would jump on over to debate the issue.......could be very interesting dont you think?
:twisted:

Errr, I think that was the general idea M8 :roll:

Peter. (who is totaly secure with the type of 4x4 he drives :) )
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

for every jeeper, there are two more that think jeepers are Grimace. :finger:
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

N*A*M wrote:for every jeeper, there are two more that think jeepers are Grimace. :finger:


:armsup:
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Post by droopypete »

droopypete wrote:I think the best thing to come from this, (apart from some stimulating debate) is the O/Limits membership boost.
Maybe we should have a poll next week along the lines of "DO SISSYS DRIVE JEEPS", think of people all around the world who will join up just to defend themselves :D
The following week it will be Toyota's, then Nissans ect ect, dont bother with Suzuki's, we are used to being called sissys :lol:
Peter
ps I still only voted once. :)


On second thought lets skip the Jeeps and go straight to the Toyota's
(I know they have a sense of humor :lol: ) I couldn't hack another week of "best all round, goes anywhere, longer penis, first 4x4, ultimate, bla bla bla"
why can't they all be like wooders?
They are right, it is a jeep thing, and I don't get it!
(and they probably think that was a complement :lol: )
Peter.
ps, apologys to the reasonable jeepers out there, (both of you :lol: )
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Cleveland, Brisbane

Post by jetpilot000 »

jeeps r sik!
[b]||Abusing Jeeps Since 2003||[/b]
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

bj on roids wrote:moving this to chit chat :cool:


Leave it here it will get pruned in Chit Chat and be gone for ever. This is prob the most popular Poll we have ever had here.
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

jetpilot000 wrote:jeeps r sik!


Yes you are correct they are very sik!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests