Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

how good is a 97 turbo deisel

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Canberra

how good is a 97 turbo deisel

Post by suzidisco »

looking at a 97 turbo deisel she is pretty standard in excellent nic little offroad use with 155k on clock what type of price do these go for

And is this a good mod being a rangie owner (sic of breaking cv ) looking for something bigger and stronger preferr deisel any other sugestions
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 10:04 am
Location: Redbank Plains, QLD

Post by Daisy »

97. is that GQ or GU??

if its GQ - 2.8 - I wouldnt bother.. go a 4.2 and turbo it.

If its GU 3 litre - i wouldnt bother - go a 4.2 turbo

If its a GU 4.2 turbodiesel.. excellent!!!!
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Canberra

Post by suzidisco »

thanks for the reply it was a GQ2.8 ill keep looking at the moment
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by amriemann »

I had a GQ 97 RX 2.8TD it was a great truck ran it with 33's no probs. never missed a beat. I'm still kicking myself for selling it.

The best why to decide is drive one.

I test drove a GQ 4.2D it was yawn S L O W. I bought the GQ2.8TD.

A few years down the track, I test drove a GU 4.2TD. I then test drove the 3.0ltr TDi and bought one, 3.0ltr blows the doors off stock GU6TDi and mines an auto with 35's ....yes auto 'cause I'm a lazy ass.

People will say once you spend $$$$ on the 4.2TDi and it'll go better, spend the same $$$$ on the 3.0TDi and so will it.

Moral of the story is don't listen to anyone, make up your own mind by test driving a few. :armsup:

Cheers,

Andrew.
SWB Mav
5" lift
50mm BL
36/12.5/15 Simex ET2's
few other bits to add yet.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

GQ wrote:97. is that GQ or GU??

if its GQ - 2.8 - I wouldnt bother.. go a 4.2 and turbo it.

If its GU 3 litre - i wouldnt bother - go a 4.2 turbo

If its a GU 4.2 turbodiesel.. excellent!!!!


or the GU 2.8?
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by amriemann »

GU 2.8 in theory was good, in reallity that's another story 300kg heavier than the GQ I must admit I have never driven a GU 2.8 but I reckon it'd be on par with a GU 4.2 D. :P
SWB Mav
5" lift
50mm BL
36/12.5/15 Simex ET2's
few other bits to add yet.
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 10:04 am
Location: Redbank Plains, QLD

Post by Daisy »

amriemann wrote:GU 2.8 in theory was good, in reallity that's another story 300kg heavier than the GQ I must admit I have never driven a GU 2.8 but I reckon it'd be on par with a GU 4.2 D. :P


GU has the electronic fuel injector pump. - can be done up by motsons to get a bit more torque/power out of it.

I went 4.2 because i want to run 36's.

Bogged.. - my mistake.. too much :drinking:
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by solinoid »

i bought a 96 GQ 2.8 TD after driving a 4.2D

its amazing how good the 2.8TD goes especially if u keep itin the turbo range

test drive one and see how u like it, for me i upgraded from a suzuki sierra :)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests