Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Newbie here to this section.

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: QLD

Newbie here to this section.

Post by TWISTER »

I was hoping somebody could help me, I've owned two 4wd's before and am now considering buying another one. My question is I am considering buying a Pajero 4 door, I am considering either the NM or NL - which is better & why? I plan on travelling around Australia, but I enjoy the rough stuff and playing in the rocks! My mate has a 4" lifted GU Patrol & I want to be able to keep up with him!? :?

An help would be great as I've never owned a Mitsubishi before!
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

The NL has a solid rear axle which will give you better articulation in rough stuff, and a separate chassis which makes a body lift feasible (for additional sill clearance - although the NL body was factory mounted 30mm higher on the chassis than earlier Gen 2s.)

The NM has independent suspension all round, so on-road handling is better, but is a monocoque design (without a separate chassis) so a traditional body lift isn't possible - but kits are available in Japan to lift the body from the suspension subframes.

ARB have just released an air locker to suit the front of both, but currently there isn't an air locker available for the back. Fortunately, the Mitsu LSDs are among the better ones. If you hunt around you might find a factory rear locker for the NL, but I don't think such a beast exists for the NM. GrantW can tell you more about rear lockers in an NL.

If you're thinking diesel for remote touring the DiD is a significantly better performer than the 2.8 tdi, but is only available in quite recent vehicles. The petrol motor is essentially the same in both vehicles.

I hope the above is correct - if not, I'm sure somebody will correct me!

Cheers,

Scott
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:12 pm
Location: Brisbane southside

re

Post by Grantw »

I would go the NL as it will have better offroad capabilitys with the solid rear end.

My 2 cents
09 Mitsu Evo X Mr
09 Suzuki Swift
09 VW 190kw Tiguan
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: QLD

Post by TWISTER »

Thanks guys, very useful information.... :lol:

I'll keep you posted, I have some magazine articles on the NL, so I'll read up on it.

Thanks again.
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

Yes if you want to play on the rocks the NL is the go and there is more scope for mods.
Also with the factory body lift you can run 33"s pretty much bog standard :D
There is now a ARB front locker available and as Scott says you can hunt around the wreckers for a factory rear locker but they are extremely hard to find for the 3.5 V6.
However the lsd in the NL onwards was upgraded to a Torsen type (gear/viscous coupling) as opposed to the old clutch pack type. These are much superior and lock up better than the older version.
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: North Rocks

Post by RichardW »

Agree. NL for rock hopping.

I'll add the NL/NM/NP for bush tracks, the NL/NM for sand and the NM/NP for outback touring.
Richard
2005 Landcruiser TD100+a few bits
[url=http://members.iinet.net.au/~rwindeyer/IMG_4509adj.jpg][b]My Rig[/b][/url]
[url=http://richardw.redbubble.com/][b]My Profile[/b][/url]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests