Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Landy or Nissan?

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Landy or Nissan?

Post by mabsydney »

I own a '99 110 extreme, have had it almost a year now and done a fair bit of off road work in it. I have basic mods like OME suspension, snorkel etc. I bought it because I believed LRs hype that the Defender is 'the worlds toughest 4wd'. What I didn't realise when I bought it was it is a noisey, outdated uncomfortable son of a bitch. Australia has some long tracks and hours if not days of driving on the black top to get there. Not being able to hear the stereo or my girlfriend for that matter, getting back ache from a few hours in the narrow seats jammed in close to the doors, a/c that struggles to cool the car on an average day is is completely useless in the Ausie summer, getting everything covered in dust which pours into the truck from everywhere on dusty tracks, constant rattles squeaks and bangs on corrugations...I've had enough already....

The question is what do I replace this truck with? I am thinking a Nissan Patrol with some nice off road mods...

Anyone else feel this way?
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

NO
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Post by wilsby »

Open the windows. Toss the stereo. Pretend to listen to your girlfriend. Enjoy.

I can get back aches from driving a Jaguar for a few hours, but I have driven my Defender for up to 2000 km in one go without issues.
Rangerover 4.6 HSE '96
Still stockish, but with plans
Defender 110 CSW Td5 '01
Full exo cage, all MDE axles, on 9.00x16 Michelins
Posts: 1586
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:51 am
Location: Tumut NSW

Post by DFND90 »

Kind of a Grimace question to ask in the land rover section. Bag your defender and ask us if you should buy a nissan??

What the hell were you thinking :finger: :finger:
[url=http://gods4suckers.net]god is for suckers[/url]
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

Seriousely though, your criticisms of the Defender Xtreme are all valid, but incomplete. Just wait till it starts giving you problems. You should be on first name terms with your bank manager.
Bill.
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:05 am
Location: Brisbane or 169.254.243.241

Post by RaginRover »

You have never driving a GU have you
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

No I've never driven a GU, why???
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

Daddylonglegs....Defender cost me quite a bit when I first got it, new water pump, front wheel bearings and a few niggley things that had to be fixed. To be fair it has been pretty reliable and economical since. But I have been told by several people (including a LR specialist) that the Patrol has a stronger driver train and is a tougher truck..
Posts: 1586
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:51 am
Location: Tumut NSW

Post by DFND90 »

mabsydney wrote:Daddylonglegs....Defender cost me quite a bit when I first got it, new water pump, front wheel bearings and a few niggley things that had to be fixed. To be fair it has been pretty reliable and economical since. But I have been told by several people (including a LR specialist) that the Patrol has a stronger driver train and is a tougher truck..


The patrol does have a stronger drive train but as far as 'tough' im assuming you mean off-road ability.. In stock form a defender is more capable than a patrol. And if you want comfort then a patrol will be better for you.
[url=http://gods4suckers.net]god is for suckers[/url]
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 10:09 am
Location: B.F.E

Post by RMP&O »

go P-troll! :armsup:
www.rmp-o.com
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

DFND90 wrote:
DFND90 wrote:The patrol does have a stronger drive train but as far as 'tough' im assuming you mean off-road ability.. In stock form a defender is more capable than a patrol. And if you want comfort then a patrol will be better for you.


Agreed, but how many serious off roaders do you know run stock fbs?

Yes I want comfort for long hard days in the outback, don't you?
Posts: 1586
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:51 am
Location: Tumut NSW

Post by DFND90 »

mabsydney wrote:
DFND90 wrote:
DFND90 wrote:The patrol does have a stronger drive train but as far as 'tough' im assuming you mean off-road ability.. In stock form a defender is more capable than a patrol. And if you want comfort then a patrol will be better for you.


Agreed, but how many serious off roaders do you know run stock fbs?

Yes I want comfort for long hard days in the outback, don't you?


Personally i find my D90 more than comfortable enough, sure a patrol is cushier but i like land rovers. Period. And if you like land rovers you generally dont care about small ergonomic issues. Like wilsby said Open the windows. Toss the stereo. Pretend to listen to your girlfriend. Thats exactly what i do :cool:

Patrol is more than likely cheaper to do up too, so your decision is pretty much made up isnt it? Trade your Defender on a Patrol and all your probs will be solved :D
[url=http://gods4suckers.net]god is for suckers[/url]
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:05 am
Location: Brisbane or 169.254.243.241

Post by RaginRover »

Are you looking at a petrol or a diesel patrol ? What model,

The GU diesels have the same "agricultural" feel as the defenders - the petrol versions are much more refined however you should consider the economy - the equation will work out like this - about 19 or 20L/100K around town with a petrol and about 16 or 17L/100K on the highway

But hey like DFND90 I like Rangies and Landies so hey while you are rattling you way up a track I am sitting in AC comfort with nice lush interior of my range rover :) wheeling in summer - what is the problem ;)

BTW IMO the Nissan with cost just as much if not more to fix/maintain,
last time a mate of mine priced a starter motor (for diesel) the nissan price around $1100 and he ended up paying $400 (from memory) for an after market unit - Rangie starter motor $300 including and fits models from 1970 - 2000 :)

Tom
Posts: 1586
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:51 am
Location: Tumut NSW

Post by DFND90 »

My 90 doesnt even have air-con let alone air-con that is sub par :armsup:
[url=http://gods4suckers.net]god is for suckers[/url]
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

Mabsydney, as you can tell most LandRover enthusiaststs are pretty one eyed. I don't know if that means we are half blind, but we seem to be prepared to put up with all the noise, draughts, rattles, leaks, shoddy design , poor quality control, etc etc that you have criticised, just to enjoy
"The Land Rover Experience" I have personally suffered from Roveritus for the past 36 years. It is said that there is no cure for the affliction. I don't know, but if you aren't already stricken then my advice is to get out now while you still can, before its too late.
Bill.
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:24 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by TUFFRANGIE »

Land Rovers have character-all others are just a mode of transport!

(i drive a GQ but my heart is in rover's and we own one)
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Endeavour Hills - Vic

Post by cmcd »

wilsby wrote: Pretend to listen to your girlfriend.

She knows better than to try and talk to me over the whine of the gearbox! :armsup:

Macca
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Wise words Bill...
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

At my previous job/uni we had a fleet of Cruisers (100 & 78 troopy) Hiluxes (single and dual cab) and a 4cyl TD Patrol wagon. I drove all of them at one point or another and drove the toyotas regularly.

The leaf rear trucks (hilux and 78troopy) were quite uncomfortable compared to my county, and had about the same noise as my county's ISUZU diesel (which was surprising - isuzu is a bit noisier at idle).

The 80 series and GU patrol were similar in comfort to my 110, and did have more leg room and elbow room, but the TD in the patrol had very noticeable tubo lag (very on-off type driving) and was surprisingly noisy and agricultural (even compared to my county).

At the end of the day after driving them I was happy to get back into my 3.9D county 110. The only problem was I had to pay the fuel in the county.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 9:09 pm

Post by Richard James »

I guess I keep (run and maintain) my 1976 Series 3 SWB Diesel despite the inbuilt design problems it has. It is a strong,capable vehicle and I will never (at my stage of life) change to another manufacturer. However if I were to be reborn and had the money to spend I would buy......a current Diesel Toyota SWB vehicle of some sort. (And then maybe start again and spend money - who knows?)
As Bill (Daddylonglegs) put it so well - we are faithful to Rover vehicles 'despite' their problems.
Richard Tye
Melbourne
Land Rovers Owner Club Victoria
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

Tom,

I'm defo looking at a diesel patrol, I couldnt afford to drive the 4.8 petrol around the block nevermind on a big trip. Diesel is the only choice for me....better and always available in the outback and better for river crossings....but I guess most of all more economical as I'm not made of money. As far as the Rangie goes, yeah what can I say I like them but I can't afford one...I'm sure a/c and passenger comfort is as good as any contender.

Bill,

I hear you about being a LR fanatic, there are things I like about them, hey I bought one, so I must have liked them right? But having been subjected to the LR 'experience' I think LR need to wake up and realise that well they are running with a tried and trusted design that has worked for them for years, the competition are continually adapting and evolving. That is more a comment on ergonomics than engine, I know the TD5 is a quite a high tech direct injection intercooled engine.
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 10:09 am
Location: B.F.E

Post by RMP&O »

personally I am fond of them all....Rovers, Patrols, Zooks.

We are dedicated enthusiests to a certian kind of truck that we like. It really doesn't matter which truck you drive as long as you are happy with it. Remember it is not about the car you drive but how you drive it!

I myself own and drive old Patrols, for the same reasons many of you drive Rovers. We could argue all day about what is better but to me it seems kind of pointless. Every vehicle made has strong points and weak points. Just enjoy the ride!
www.rmp-o.com
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:05 am
Location: Brisbane or 169.254.243.241

Post by RaginRover »

mabsydney wrote:Tom,

I'm defo looking at a diesel patrol, I couldnt afford to drive the 4.8 petrol around the block nevermind on a big trip. Diesel is the only choice for me....better and always available in the outback and better for river crossings....but I guess most of all more economical as I'm not made of money. As far as the Rangie goes, yeah what can I say I like them but I can't afford one...I'm sure a/c and passenger comfort is as good as any contender.

Bill,

I hear you about being a LR fanatic, there are things I like about them, hey I bought one, so I must have liked them right? But having been subjected to the LR 'experience' I think LR need to wake up and realise that well they are running with a tried and trusted design that has worked for them for years, the competition are continually adapting and evolving. That is more a comment on ergonomics than engine, I know the TD5 is a quite a high tech direct injection intercooled engine.


I hear what you are saying - I would love my rangie to be diesel
and I understand your feelings toward the 'LR experience'.

Tom
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

ISUZUROVER wrote:the TD in the patrol had very noticeable tubo lag (very on-off type driving) and was surprisingly noisy and agricultural (even compared to my county).

At the end of the day after driving them I was happy to get back into my 3.9D county 110. The only problem was I had to pay the fuel in the county.


I know this is a little bit off topic, but my understanding is that it is not so much turbo lag inthe 3.0 litre as reduced fuelling off idle inoder to reduce smoke ( to pass euro standards I think) I too noticed this and felt the car would be much better in a manual.

Ps I can't stand GU's or 100 series - WAAAAY to fat, poor visibility, vulnerable bodywork and no character.

I guess you either get Rovers or you don't.

I love them to pieces but I my wife was too scarred by the dodgy reliability of our 91 vogue to ever permit me to own another one. That's one of the things I love about the G - it's like a reliable auto 110. (with lockers)
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

One advantage of owning a LandRover is that they are so unappealing to the average Joe that you can leave your keys in the ignition all the time and it will probably never be stolen. I had my LandRover stolen a couple of years ago. Found it 200metres down the road with a note on the seat from the theif saying how sorry he felt for me and leaving me a $100 donation towards a visit to my psycho analyst.
Bill.
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

daddylonglegs wrote:One advantage of owning a LandRover is that they are so unappealing to the average Joe that you can leave your keys in the ignition all the time and it will probably never be stolen. I had my LandRover stolen a couple of years ago. Found it 200metres down the road with a note on the seat from the theif saying how sorry he felt for me and leaving me a $100 donation towards a visit to my psycho analyst.
Bill.


Very funny Bill, seriously though, a mate in the Brisbane LR club bought his son a SII 88", with push button start, no door tops and no door locks. His son used to park it at a train station every day, and after a week or two of doing this it got stolen. The police eventually found it a couple of weeks later - seems the thief had driven it until it ran out of patrol and left it.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

Post by GURU »

RMP&O wrote:Remember it is not about the car you drive but how you drive it!



Couldn't have said it better myself
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests