Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

NP rear locker

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: coolah

NP rear locker

Post by contact »

im sure this question must have been asked before but...

i know there is not arb locker

but get the impression that a factory locker is available in some markets, is this so?

and if it is has anyone sourced one? and finally are they worth sourcing?

thanks! :cool:
Veni, Vidi, Veci
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Braidwood , NSW

Post by Ian Sharpe »

The factory lokcers for the Gen 3 were available in NZ. that might be your best bet for sourcing one.

As for the benefits , well until I had my front locker fitted (which BTW will fit your NP & is available from ARB) I would have said YES, but since having the front locker installed , I would say now to get the front locker first, as IMO that makes more improvement than the rear. Then if you are still not satisfied, try & source a rear locker.
cheers
NL 3.5l auto with front & rear lockers,winch, custom 3.15 T/C gears
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: coolah

Post by contact »

i think a rear would be more useful, if you've pitched the front in the air its better then even bet that both rears are on the deck for pushing duties + thats where most weight will be if you've got a load on board... but... i was more interested to find out if the factory locker was "any good" functionally does it have any weaknesses?

ive got a couple of associates in NZ i might see if they can ask around...
Veni, Vidi, Veci
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Braidwood , NSW

Post by Ian Sharpe »

Well, I have tested many spots on my property now with & without rear & front lockers on.

This has revealed one thing for sure. There has been NO occasion (yet) with the front locker only On that I have not been able to get thru.

Whereas on the other hand on the same spots the rear locker only has NOT been able to pull me thru.

ANyway the rear locker doesnt have any weaknessess that I have noticed

It runs at a lot less pressure than the ARB lockers & no doubt is probably a lot less trouble refitting than an ARB. That is for the non IRS rear ends anyway.

Your NP being IRS maybe a bit harder to fit, I dont know. But in any case it may be best to get the entire rear end, just to make sure you have all the bits & pieces.

Good luck with your search
NL 3.5l auto with front & rear lockers,winch, custom 3.15 T/C gears
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:15 pm
Location: Ringwood East, VIC

Post by RoldIT »

contact wrote:i think a rear would be more useful, if you've pitched the front in the air its better then even bet that both rears are on the deck for pushing duties + thats where most weight will be if you've got a load on board... but... i was more interested to find out if the factory locker was "any good" functionally does it have any weaknesses?

ive got a couple of associates in NZ i might see if they can ask around...


In the instance you refer to, if both rear wheels are touching they are getting "some" traction with or without a locker. But with the front in the air, all torque is going to the raised wheel providing you with no pull what so ever (effectively only 2WD). With a front locker, at least one of your front wheels is helping the two back. (effectively 3WD - 50% increase in drive) Let's face it, there are few situations you'll rooster a back wheel before a front unless going downhill when you've got gravity on your side anyway.

To a certain extent I agree with most of the weight being on the back wheels but after being in a mates Paj on the weekend after fitting a front locker, definately money is better spent on the front first. That and the fact that the front is the most easily sourcable for you at the moment. Don't forget you've got an LSD in the back that's also going to help the rears keep turning.
KRiS
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: coolah

Post by contact »

thanks for that... i would have thought that the IRS rear would be a quick swap - especially if you got the whole thing... that is at least if its like the old datto 1600 (etc) a diff swap was not such a big deal - hence the idea of the factory rear sounds "easy"
Veni, Vidi, Veci
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

Definitely a front locker makes more of an offroad improvment (especially if you have a rear lsd) than just a rear locker. I had a rear locker for 2 years before fitting the front Detroit and it made much more difference offroad than the rear one did.
There are a few Gen 3 models running around with front Detroits that go very well by all accounts and much better than a Gen 2 with just a rear locker.
The Gen 3 has a very good gear driven rear lsd so I'd be definitely going a front ARB first before tossing out that good lsd.
The IRS centre is like a salisbury type which should be an easy swap just depends if the CV's are the same length as the lsd version.
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: coolah

Post by contact »

thnaks for that... perhaps a fornt only is the way to go...

when you say gear driven lsd is it a torsen?
Veni, Vidi, Veci
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

It's not actually a Torsen brand lsd but works on a similar principle which is more effective than the previous clutch pack lsd's.
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/inte ... ro_05.html
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest