Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

How to go RE tyres

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply

What size tyres should i go for


Poll ended at Sun Oct 03, 2004 9:03 am

235/85R16 (about 32 but narrow)
7
28%
32x11.5R15
5
20%
32x10.5R16
1
4%
33x10.5R15 (will take some bashing with a BFH)
8
32%
Stick with 31's
4
16%
 
Total votes: 25

Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

How to go RE tyres

Post by Gonzo »

Ok so with 2.5/3 inches of lift in the suspension and 1 inch body lift should i go

  • 235/85R16 (about 32 but narrow)
  • 32x11.5R15
  • 32x10.5R16
  • 33x10.5R15 (will take some bashing with a BFH)
  • or should i just stick with littleish 31's


???

I`m not worried about getting out the angle grider here...

Either way i`ll be buying some new rims with the biggest offset that i can find, rockhopper too...
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Ask Antt... he knows from experience on his efi LWB.

You want to try and keep the rotational weight down so you want relatively narrow.

7.5R16's are also an option - 32" tall and much lighter than the 32" mongrels that he's running.
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Post by fightara »

33s!

Humvit did it :D
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Re: How to go RE tyres

Post by fightara »

Gonzo wrote:Location: Hiding under a rock in Crows Nest


:rofl:
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: How to go RE tyres

Post by antt »

Gonzo wrote:Ok so with 2.5/3 inches of lift in the suspension and 1 inch body lift should i go

  • 235/85R16 (about 32 but narrow)
  • 32x11.5R15
  • 32x10.5R16
  • 33x10.5R15 (will take some bashing with a BFH)
  • or should i just stick with littleish 31's

???

I`m not worried about getting out the angle grider here...

Either way i`ll be buying some new rims with the biggest offset that i can find, rockhopper too...


mine has 2in body 2in suspension, so probably pretty similar height to yours. and i am running 32x10.5 on f100 offset on the front and a little bigger offset on the rear.

i had to chop the shiat out of the front to get em on and belt the living crap out of the firewall and they still hit pretty often.


out of that list i'd recommend the 235/85R16 for a tire your gonna run on the street all the time. cause its still big, but narrow so it wont hit as much, plus theres less weight to it so ya wont be breaking shiat like me.
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

31's never measure 31, I voted 32X11.5, I ran these in mtrs for a while and was happy, but nothing beats the howl and shake of a swamper
yeshemesh
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

bigsteve wrote:but nothing beats the howl and shake of a swamper


not even?

Image
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

Gonzo wrote:
bigsteve wrote:but nothing beats the howl and shake of a swamper


not even?

Image


Well thats just wrong
yeshemesh
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

What sort of tyres are you talking about? I was looking to go 235/85R16 on the Vit as I think they are a nice balance of height and width without adding to much loading to the front end but the cost of 16" rims definately adds to the expense. 33x10.5 means BFG or Simex JT. You could always go Old School with the 7.50x16 and get some Simex MP Trekker's for $200. I think Antt is running 8" rims with a bit off negative offset so maybe 7" rims and less offset might fit a little better but you might want to look at a 2" bodylift cause suspension lift ain't the same for tyre clearance when you take compression into account. The Humvit had no bodylift I think but some severe body modification with a variety of tools. Don't forget the wider the tyre and the bigger the offset the more extreme you're going to have to get to make them fit. What are you going to do about high range gearing cause the manual struggles more than the auto with larger rubber.
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

Post by SiKiD_01 »

i have 31"x10.50"R15 on at the moment. heavy as all chit, and affected the response big time. i can fit 32"s and have minimal rubbing on compression at the front. like you said, u need to use a BFH!

i haven't had much to do with the taller and narrower tyres, my only experience is when my dad had a hilux about 10 years ago, and had some super grippers with 16" steel split rims.

would be interesting, to me, to see how they go and look on a vitara.

i watched a whole heap of the malaysian rainforest challenges, and they use pretty much a tall and narrow tyre on a 16 inch rim. i think anyway, one thing that got me was that, even though some had very low tyre pressure, hardly any of them ran beadlocks. is this the case for the skinny tyres? no beadlocks?

i dont really know what/where you drive, but i'm assuming that its a bit of everything. should it matter what choice you make, what do you have in mind craig?

in conclusion, i dont have much to tell you, in that most of you already know what i said, but if i could, i wouldn't mind trying to fit some 33x10.5R15 on a vit, and you did say you dont mind getting the grinder out.

the dude at http://www.k9rdj.co.uk/ runs 35x10.5 simex ETs.

really, i have NFI!
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

The dude on that site is running a sierra tcase and 5.83 R&P's too...
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

possum hunter is running 33's on his. It is a tray back mind you so the rear clears easily, the fronts after a little cutting clear reasonably but he is busting stuff all the time.

I would not recomend anything bigger than 32" on a Vit due to the CV and high range gearing issues.

I would suggest that the MTR would also be the most agressive tyre you should look at. reason being is that if you have a more agressive tyre you're going to spend your SAS money replacing CV joints every monday.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Sounds like antt's doing much better after accepting the limitation that IFS has in travel. His strut spacres appear to have been the CV killer
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:45 am
Location: Cockatoo/Vic

Post by possum hunter »

I run 33/13.5 bout 2.5' sus 2' BL. For mine if i was keeping the ifs i would be looking at the 32/9.5or10.5 simex ..
but all depends on how you drive it if i want to i can go for ages without breaking a cv/spline but most of the time you want to go hard if you do you 'will' break stuff...I have gone through bout 16 to date and have four left in my kit before the sas starts....
For a while i ran 31/10.5 mtrs and they where great but bigger is better
right?????????
33's =lower sus & 2" BL or stockpile cv's
true 32's/31's =drive with caution and all may be fine
Just my 2c worth i'm sure not all will agree but that has been my experience....... :?
Cockatoo Canvas
Pvc & Canvas Products
0409 092 741 www.cockatoocanvas.com
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

Thanks for all the input

I`m thinking 32 MTR`s on 15 inch rims...

low range will be taken care of with rockhopper, i'll deal with high range...

i was thinking about an extreme tyre, but most of the tracks that i`m doing are more suited to the MTR`s - simex would just be overkill

that and things are more likley to go pop with more grip :?
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Post by fightara »

MT/R is a helluvalot cheaper too. Every rig I've seen running these on rocks goes really well. Depending on the tyre of course, the more "extreme" tyres (ie. most simex) seem to be setup more for mud than rock, which is prob what you'll be driving :?:

Have you broken much on your Vit previously?
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

fightara wrote:Have you broken much on your Vit previously?



erm, just about everything :oops:

if i can find some available 16 inch rims, i`ll go with them but that looks doubtful...
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Post by fightara »

Gonzo wrote:
fightara wrote:Have you broken much on your Vit previously?



erm, just about everything :oops:

if i can find some available 16 inch rims, i`ll go with them but that looks doubtful...


Standard GV rims are 16" - but they're probably not wide enough.
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

wrong offset too :(
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

get used to gear changing gonzo. 32's kill mine on the road
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

power

Post by SiKiD_01 »

you all got efi, try carby!!!

:cry:
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

power and speed arent really an issue - i didnt buy a zook to hoon in...

i have a subaru for that :cool:
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I reckon that standard GV 16" rims will be sweet if you can find them. they are 16X7 and the offset is ok - GV's with 16's have flares to cover them.

We have a car in the club here running 32 9.5 16 'pedes (same diameter as a 34" swamper) on stock V6 vitara rims.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 1275
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Gonzo »

... still want the bigger offset for the 11.5 wide mtrs i think

might make it a bit less tippy too i hope
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

Beastmavster wrote:Ask Antt... he knows from experience on his efi LWB.

You want to try and keep the rotational weight down so you want relatively narrow.

7.5R16's are also an option - 32" tall and much lighter than the 32" mongrels that he's running.


I agree though no one else will most like.
Get the 235 x 85 x 16's to hell with the cost of rims.
The BFG MT measures in at 32" all you'll ever need.
I have a new set of BFG MT 31 x 10.5 x 15's and will be changing to the 235x85x16's when I've had my $ worth.
Light zookis don't need a wide tyre. But bigger diameter is a help.
LM
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Gonzo wrote:... still want the bigger offset for the 11.5 wide mtrs i think

might make it a bit less tippy too i hope



Use the rims offset for the extra width and stability, not the tyres......

You only need to buy the rims once remember..... you'll get over it.

If you have to get some made up custom......
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests