Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

what's the best tow / touring 4wd?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Dalby

Post by Utemad »

spazbot wrote:funny you say that bout the 7.3l ftrucks my cousin get around the same millage as my olds 100 series whichs is a hell of alot less then the 20lper100 we get in the 4.5l petrol 80 on the highway

Go the dicso


Depends on the driving you do. Around town we get about 550km from a tank or 900km at best with all hwy. So that is 18L/100km around town or 11L/100km on the hwy. These are the best figures we have ever gotten with a light foot and unloaded with an auto 7.3L V8. If you put the boot in occaisionally then the fuel bill goes up faster than you can blink. Most cars will but this one really skyrockets.

Depending on your load the fuel economy doesn't differ too much on the hwy but towing a car trailer it does dip a little.

Ours are also dual cabs so have a 113L tank while the others get 144L.

Having said that they would certainly be my pick of vehicle if you were doing a lot of heavy towing but they are not the most reliable vehicles on the planet.
Land Rover Discovery series 1 V8
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

replies

Post by Roctoy »

thanks fopr the imput fellas, keep it coming!

For your information i'm not going to be towing the hilux around Australia!
It will only be a tow rig from time to time. I guess it is going to be more a touring vehicle, the 80 series cruiser is my fav choice at the moment as i'm a Toyota guy as it is.
What makes a GQ of the same year model and similar engine type 5k cheaper than a cruiser?

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Picton

Re: replies

Post by Tazz »

roc70y wrote:thanks fopr the imput fellas, keep it coming!

For your information i'm not going to be towing the hilux around Australia!
It will only be a tow rig from time to time. I guess it is going to be more a touring vehicle, the 80 series cruiser is my fav choice at the moment as i'm a Toyota guy as it is.
What makes a GQ of the same year model and similar engine type 5k cheaper than a cruiser?

Chris


Nissans are 10g's cheaper when new, thats why they cheaper when old too.
My turbo 80 pulls my 3+ tonne of car, trailer & tools around, 110-120 on express way ok, big hills kill it a bit but there's a fair bit of weight there.
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:44 am
Location: Townsville

Post by BigMav »

Test drive a couple of 80 series and GQ's, everyone has there own preference but in reality there really isn't that much difference between them besides the way they look. What sold me was the bulletproof drivetrain on the GQ, and the price. Both extremely good vehicles for what you intend on doing.
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

comparo

Post by Roctoy »

BigMav wrote:Test drive a couple of 80 series and GQ's, everyone has there own preference but in reality there really isn't that much difference between them besides the way they look. What sold me was the bulletproof drivetrain on the GQ, and the price. Both extremely good vehicles for what you intend on doing.

:cry: my parents owned an 80 for 10 yrs it was like a big car to drive rather than a 4wd, the GQ is more boxy, seems like driving a bit of a truck. The 80,s are much nicer inside but that's not high on the priority list. I think it's going to come down to the dollar value.

I'd prefer a petrol because
1. my lux is petrol (i can syphon fuel from one to the other if the need arrises,
2. bit more power (my last car was a 2.4l surf :cry: )
3. i hate waiting for inconsiderate people at petrol stations who park their camry or magna in the way of the only diesel pump in the place whilst all the other petrol pumps are vacant!
4. The smell of diesel on your hands after you've filled up never goes away. (wear a glove i know but who can be bothered doing that!)

What sort of mileage does a petrol patrol lwb get on the hwy?

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

RUFF wrote:Can anyone give the Australian Legal towing capacities of the following Vehicles?

GQ-GU=
80Series=
Triton=
F-Trucks=
Range Rover,Discovery=





Dunno if this is what ur after, but from 4wd Monthly:

Early GU Patrol auto = 2500kg
Early GU Patrol man. = 2800kg
3.0 TD GU Patrol = 3200kg
4.2 TD & 4.8 P GU Patrol= 3500kg
Patrol ute = 2500kg
Navara (new) 3.3 P = 2000kg
Navara (new) 3.0 TD = 3000kg


80/ 100 series = 3500kg
Troopy/ 78 utes = 3500kg
Prado 130 = 2500kg
Hilux (all newies) = 1800kg

Pajero (new) = 2500kg
Triton petrols = 1500kg
Triton diesels = 2200kg (max towball download 100kg)

Land Rover Defender(all)= 3500kg
Land Rover Discovery = 3500kg
Range Rover = ?

Courier = 1800kg
Ford Explorer (new) = 1600kg (they aren't they even good 4 this!)
Ford Explorer (old) auto = 2800kg
Ford Explorer (old) man. = 2380kg
F- trucks = 4500kg

Rodeo (1991- 2000) = 1800kg
Rodea (current) = 2000kg

That's all I could find.
Josh.
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

Just to add my 2c worth- the Tritons have had a few good reports about their towing ability.

Chris, since you prefer petrol maybe consider automatic Explorer- seems to me they have great engine/ trans for towing, comfy as and apparently return very good fuel economy (10L/100km hwy). Just going off the rap they got in 4wd Monthly.
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

here one for you slosh:

TJ - 900kg :oops:
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: comparo

Post by grimbo »

roc70y wrote:
BigMav wrote:Test drive a couple of 80 series and GQ's, everyone has there own preference but in reality there really isn't that much difference between them besides the way they look. What sold me was the bulletproof drivetrain on the GQ, and the price. Both extremely good vehicles for what you intend on doing.

:cry: my parents owned an 80 for 10 yrs it was like a big car to drive rather than a 4wd, the GQ is more boxy, seems like driving a bit of a truck. The 80,s are much nicer inside but that's not high on the priority list. I think it's going to come down to the dollar value.

I'd prefer a petrol because
1. my lux is petrol (i can syphon fuel from one to the other if the need arrises,
2. bit more power (my last car was a 2.4l surf :cry: )
3. i hate waiting for inconsiderate people at petrol stations who park their camry or magna in the way of the only diesel pump in the place whilst all the other petrol pumps are vacant!
4. The smell of diesel on your hands after you've filled up never goes away. (wear a glove i know but who can be bothered doing that!)

What sort of mileage does a petrol patrol lwb get on the hwy?

Chris


I get about 350km from a 70l tank on either gas or petrol in my 91 GQ LWB but it does have 33s and stock gearing
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: replies

Post by -Scott- »

roc70y wrote:What makes a GQ of the same year model and similar engine type 5k cheaper than a cruiser?


Doesn't have a Toyota badge on the bonnet.

My brother's 80 series diesel (31" ATs, 2" suspension lift, dual batteries and bull bar) has cracked it's lower radiator mounts (since repaired) and recently cracked both front body mounts.

I can't comment on his driving style - haven't been too far off road with him.

FYI.

Scott
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Roctoy »

slosh wrote:Just to add my 2c worth- the Tritons have had a few good reports about their towing ability.

Chris, since you prefer petrol maybe consider automatic Explorer- seems to me they have great engine/ trans for towing, comfy as and apparently return very good fuel economy (10L/100km hwy). Just going off the rap they got in 4wd Monthly.


thanks Josh but no thanks.

I hate ford explorers, they are only good for towing caravans and horse floats, something which i will NEVER do! We must have overtaken at least 10 of them during our Cape trip. I want something that still has good 4wd abilities.

We took 6 of them to stockton beach for a test day with ford, before their release. All 6 of them went home with bumpers, skirts and other bash plates / guards, trims etc in the back seat.

We definitely put them through their paces that day!

as for the Tritons, i'm really after a wagon instead of a ute.

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

DISCO.

TDI if you want economy.
V8 if you dont care.

Michael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Roctoy »

HSV Rangie wrote:DISCO.

TDI if you want economy.
V8 if you dont care.

Michael.

My last boss has a td5 disco, in 2 years i think he has spent more on servicing than the truck cost to buy new.

Besides that i'd like a bit more space in the back.

Other than that i wouldn't mind a v8 disco.

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:20 pm
Location: Seaham NSW

Post by My Lil Lux »

1MadEngineer wrote:89-91 Range Rover Vogue :armsup:


I agree - full power options :D


I had a 98 2.8 diesel triton, It could carry a good load, and I reckon went pretty good for a natural aspirated, better than a 2.8 lux, but wasn't that great for towing, I reckon a rangie or a Mav, GQ goodness with the blue oval discount badge on it. :armsup:
Try not to let your mind wander...It is too
small and fragile to be out by itself.
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

i towed my buggy with a petrol GQ for most of this year. they are fine if you only want to tow a few times a year, but if you are towing every weekend with one, like i was, they are a bit slow. dropping off to 60-70kmh on every hill gets annoying real quick. the turbo'd diesels are a much better option. if you really have to have a petrol 4x4 for towing, get something with an 8 in it.
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Towing Capacity of a 3.9EFI Range Rover is 4000kg Braked. You wont find anything else that can Tow as well or have as much room in side than a 90+ Range Rover.

I have an 86 3.5 EFI Hi-line and it has all electric options. With the Back seat out i comfortably sleep in it with my wife. Which makes it a shit load easier when we go for a 2 day Comp somewhere. Fuel economy on mine Sucks but its got Fuel issues causing this. They usually get around 18K/L and 25K/L towing. I paid $2500 for this. Its in mint condition.

For $10-15 000 you should be able to buy a 90+ 3.9EFI Auto one with Low Ks and a heap of extras. Other than oil leaks they realy are not such a bad buy.
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Roctoy »

RUFF wrote:Towing Capacity of a 3.9EFI Range Rover is 4000kg Braked. You wont find anything else that can Tow as well or have as much room in side than a 90+ Range Rover.

I have an 86 3.5 EFI Hi-line and it has all electric options. With the Back seat out i comfortably sleep in it with my wife. Which makes it a shit load easier when we go for a 2 day Comp somewhere. Fuel economy on mine Sucks but its got Fuel issues causing this. They usually get around 18K/L and 25K/L towing. I paid $2500 for this. Its in mint condition.

For $10-15 000 you should be able to buy a 90+ 3.9EFI Auto one with Low Ks and a heap of extras. Other than oil leaks they realy are not such a bad buy.

yeah but would you do a trip like the Canning stock route in it? Cause that's on my to do list for next year.
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

yes.

many have done with no issues.

Michael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

Lets face it......80-GQ not a lot of difference, price, availability...deals...shop around and find one at the right price

Deisel will always be more economical to tow with, and at the stage of the life you are looking to buy, will last longer before rebuilds etc

I used to have a rodeo 2.8td wich I used to tow a cattle trailer around with...put hd springs in it and it didn't budge..will prob pick up a 96-98 mod for 15k or ok as a tourer. what about a surf???

Tiny :twisted:
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

comparo

Post by Roctoy »

GQ's are carby and late 80's are injected?

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Some GQs are definitely injected. I was told that's why Les Siviour started racing the LWB - the LWB had the injected motor, the SWB didn't.

I don't know if/when that situation changed.

I still say go the diesel - GQ if you have to, but a Paj will do what you need. :twisted:

Scott
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

I was in the same boat as you Chris, not so long back :D

My 1992 LWB GQ is EFI ;)

I bought the GQ as a tow rig for the 40.

I purchased the GQ over the 80 series purely as it was cheaper for similar spec rigs. Both rigs do pretty much the same thing, look fairly similar, drive similar etc.

It sucks the juice as people are saying. But would you expect any different from a huge 4b with a big 6 ?

And it is a quite comfortable vehicle to drive around in. Air con, power windows etc.
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Roctoy »

Shorty40 wrote:I was in the same boat as you Chris, not so long back :D

My 1992 LWB GQ is EFI ;)

I bought the GQ as a tow rig for the 40.

I purchased the GQ over the 80 series purely as it was cheaper for similar spec rigs. Both rigs do pretty much the same thing, look fairly similar, drive similar etc.

It sucks the juice as people are saying. But would you expect any different from a huge 4b with a big 6 ?

And it is a quite comfortable vehicle to drive around in. Air con, power windows etc.


i think i'll be looking for one like yours it's a nice truck. i want injection over carby so i think 92 onwards looks to be the go.

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 7230
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by MissDrew »

GQ`s are truck like to drive
80`s are almost car like.

Drive one of each (TI or GXL) I`d almost put money on it that the 80 is heeps better to drive.

remember the old saying you get what you pay for. Well this is why GQ`s are so much cheaper for the same specs then a 80.

For strength yes the GQ`s are stronger then the 80, but for comfort and driveability the 80`s shit all over a GQ.
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:38 am
Location: Sydney

Re: comparo

Post by Roctoy »

roc70y wrote: my parents owned an 80 for 10 yrs it was like a big car to drive rather than a 4wd, the GQ is more boxy, seems like driving a bit of a truck. The 80,s are much nicer inside but that's not high on the priority list. I think it's going to come down to the dollar value.


i've got another project in mind so we'll see how things pan out...

Chris
Outers & Arms up stickers coming soon you hungry bitches!

http://www.myultimate4wd.com
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Posts: 1363
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:54 am
Location: Scarborough, Qld

Post by bigbluemav »

Go the Patrol!!!

GU TD42T if you can afford it......GQ TD42 if that's in your price range.

Driveline is heaps stronger..no comparison really. 'Cruiser have probs with gearbox, particularly those used as tow units. mainshafts go, $1500 fix. LSD no good after 50k.

Patrols have a practicably unbreakable drivetrain and the TD42 is a truck engine........which equals reliability and long service, also no timing belts to break or replace every 100k.

With the right susp. kit you can make it what you want, comfy on road, capable off road, whatever!!


Regards
Big Dave, Scarborough, Qld
Loose Screws 4wd Racing Team
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Kingston,Hobart, Tasmania

Post by justinC »

The only vehicle with 1500kg payload and 4000kg tow capacity... Defender 130" dual cab. A real chassis and a real diesel engine. Td5 with 176kw and 510 Nm chip and intercooler. Eats most others on hills, tow anything and use less fuel. Constant 4X4 with traction control, big 4 wheel discs and coils allround. The only problem is that it has shocking seats and ergonomics, but think of all that torque...
'92 Rangie Sherwood/turbo intercooled isuzu4BD1 /ACE/ full leather/2.5" exh/2.5" body lift/DeCarbon shocks/LR tanks/LT95 back in and OK now, Sals conversion soon...
Posts: 830
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 11:29 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by Old Yella »

PK wrote:I know that GQ's would probably be the go, but since I own one as a family car (and we do all our holidays in it towing a camper trailer - Fraser, Innamincka, Birdsville, Flinders Ranges etc) I would vote for a series 1 Disco or Rangie. (I also own a Wrangler - my toy, and my son has a sierra)
If you get on to a good one, you'll love it, get onto a lemon and you'll slash your wrists :D



:oops: yes I know the feeling

I once owned a 94 model 3.9 injected auto discovery that I bought for a tow touring rig, that had serious problems that no one could fix.
It cost me a fortune taking it to rover specialists, and no one could find the problem, in the end I sold it at a huge loss cause down here no one wants them :roll:
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 1:30 am
Location: BrisVegas

Post by Mad Cruiser »

Interesting as my 80 series cruiser factory towbar says 2500kgs
1998 Toyota Landcruiser 100 series GXL
1976 FJ45 Landcruiser ute
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Aotearoa

Post by J Top »

There is a year change in the 80 series,maybe 1994, where before that the towbar rating is 2.5 tonnes and after that it is 3.5 tonnes,the Hayman Reese bars come with both rating stickers so you can rate the vehicle correctly.
J Top
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests