Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

36"x12.5 ET'II

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Forum rules
Post Reply
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Contact:
Contact Jay

36"x12.5 ET'II

Post by Jay »

I ll be buying my tyres next week so need your advice:

Anyone running the 36x12.5 ET'II ? How do you rate their adhesion on rock,mud performance...compared to the performance of the ET'I and JT'II?
Seems that the ET'II is made from a harder material to last longer.
Thanks for the feedback SOON :!: :idea:
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Top
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 4:20 pm
Location: NZ

Post by lowbox »

A lot heavier than the 35" Centipedes... think carefully.
ct
Top
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Davidh »

Can't speak from experience with the 36" ET2's, but from what I gathered after Vic Winch here in Melbourne, the 35" ET's seemed to clean better in the mud than the 36"s.

As for other surfaces I don't know, as Vic Winch was mostly mud!
Top
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Contact:
Contact Slunnie

Post by Slunnie »

I thought the 35" ETs looked like they had more traction than the 36" ET2s at the LCMP winch challenge also. That was on loose dirt and a bit of small rock.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Rover”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests