apart from a strange choice of 4b he is also computer illiterate,so here goes he owns a hilux,he has been told you can put coils in the rear i searched back through the last ten pages and found no reference or threads.
my
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
any help would be
![Cool :cool:](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX
hookedonsuzi
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:55 pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
first and foremost i dont own a TOYOTA my mate does.
apart from a strange choice of 4b he is also computer illiterate,so here goes he owns a hilux,he has been told you can put coils in the rear i searched back through the last ten pages and found no reference or threads.
my is can this be done and how hard is it.
any help would be .
HiluxMichael wrote:Hi hookedonsuzi!
Take a look at this link:
http://www.4lux.net/index.php?set_albumName=album82&option=com_gallery&Itemid=&include=view_album.php
This guy did a complete coil conversion on his lux.
Maybe a help...
Michael
benno_from_brizvegas wrote:hey bubs do you know anything about the legalities of coil conversion in qld?
just curious
benno
HiluxMichael wrote:bubs wrote:
yes but radius arms front and rear, good for a touring rig/mild wheeler
you´re right - but it works in all the bunderas![]()
(this is my brothers LJ73)
hookedonsuzi wrote:
is this a good conversion or not.
is it worth it,how hard is it.
any idea on costs.
hookedonsuzi wrote:ok guys this got way of track.
is this a good conversion or not.
ok it can be engineered and can be done.
is it worth it,how hard is it.
any idea on costs.
bubs please reply.
regards hooked.
professor wrote:you could do it like this.
You know try biting off more than you can chew.IM STILL CHEWING![]()
Do your home work!!!!!!
dumbdunce wrote:professor wrote:you could do it like this.
You know try biting off more than you can chew.IM STILL CHEWING![]()
Do your home work!!!!!!
hey Prof, are they the same silverstone tyres that AnthonyP blew up and had replaced under warranty? they sound scary...
nice fab work.
cheers
Brian
professor wrote:
All 5 link gear is over rated there is only one advantage with 5 link and that is the ability to adjust castor for big lifts. thay still bind up as much as the normal radious arms
dumbdunce wrote:professor wrote:
All 5 link gear is over rated there is only one advantage with 5 link and that is the ability to adjust castor for big lifts. thay still bind up as much as the normal radious armsthis is a ridiculous claim. have you SEEN the articulation difference between the front and rear of an 80 series or GU/GQ? all the binding in a 5 link setup is due to the design of the linkage ends - in the case of patrol and landcruiser, it is limited by the available twist and crush in the rubber eye bushes, but if you example you changed the bush ends for rose joints (or even just undo the bolts a turn so the end bush crush sleeves are free to turn!), flex from a five link is limited only by the physical limitations of links hitting each other, tyres hitting the chassis/body etc, as with a triangulated 4 link.
the radius arm setup on patrol/80 series front, bundera front and rear, relies entirely on crush and twist in the extremely stiff axle-to-control arm bushes for its minimal flex - the setup is designed almost entirely for on-road control at minimal cost. if you replaced the bushes with rose joints, articulation would be reduced to near zero as there would be no compression available in the joints. if you want to see what the binding on this setup is doing in a practical, measurable way, ramp a stock 80 or patrol (on a ramp or a pile of dirt, it doesn't matter), then back it up, pull out one (just one, from one side, leave the other side alone) of the front-most leading arm to axle mounting bolts, then ramp it again, preferable with the removed bolt on the low side.
I'm not discounting the fact that 4 link setups are great for articulation, and the advantage they inherently have over 5-links is they are symmetrical, but they are difficult to fit in front, and *will* have bump- and flex- steer issues when used on a steering axle, no matter how well you set it up (unless you go full hydro), whereas a 5 link, properly set up, will have almost zero flex- or bump-steer.
cheers
Brian
cbr wrote:Da Lux wrote:anyone know if u could get a coil rear legal in wa
Not sure, but I will be trying in the near future. WA laws suckI would think that you would need to do a lane chage test to get it approved.
Chris.
GRIMACE wrote:How I miss the days of care free wheelin with the crews!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests