Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

What's your final crawl ratio?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

God of Athiests
Posts: 8337
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Post by DamTriton »

35, going on 41 with the new R&P
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

Hoonz wrote:yeh didn't see ur post up there a bit ...

so mine worked out to be 85.4820816

4.88 crawler gears from marks
4.11 diffs
4.262 1st

prolly minus some for the 35z


how did you get 4.88 fomr marks, they quote there ratio as 3.743:1 on there site?
Posts: 4275
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 6:41 pm
Location: Western Australia

Post by Hoonz »

eh yeh so they are just checked the box ... dunno why i had 4.88 on the mind
H( * )( * )NZ loves B( * )( * )BIES
if a fat lady falls in the forest do the trees laugh?
[quote="RUFF"]although i didnt mean to, i squealed like a girl :armsup:[/quote]
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

Hoonz wrote:eh yeh so they are just checked the box ... dunno why i had 4.88 on the mind


its because that what you want in the diffs, it will be slower again
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


dic factor :D
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

spazbot wrote:108:1

g52 - lux duals - 5.29s


how low can you gow :)


same as mine

but series 3 and 4.88's
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Tumut, NSW

Post by Barathrum »

112:1

zook 5 speed, 6.1 t-case, 5.12 Vitara diffs
Posts: 4426
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by bru21 »

87:1 dual cases and 4.625 gu diffs
ADHD Racing would like to thank
Mrs Bru @ Sunshine Coast Developmental Physiotherapy - www.scdphysio.com.au , Ryano @ Fourbys www.generaltire.com.au Blitzkrieg Motorsport
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:47 pm
Location: Manjimup, Western Australia

Post by ausyota »

Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?

Because I can :)
I do agree with you somewhat in the fact that a lot of obsticles need momentum to negotiate witch at 150+ you dont get.

But really with dual cases you can always put just one case in low if you dont to crawl really slow.

The reason mine will be so low is that I allready have the lower gears for one of the transfers (and really like the ratio) so I will chuck them in the rear case and use them probably 90% of the time and when I really need to crawl over something crazy I can lock in the front transfer.

If I didnt allready have the gears I would have just used 2 stock cases and been at around 100 to 1.
Paul.
R.I.P Brock Fontanini 28-3-06 - 16-2-08
www.teamcarnage.net
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

I'll crawl until she gives in :(
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Goulburn

Post by MY45 »

Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


What was the 40s crawl at dan?
----HillBilly Engineering----
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

49:1 in my IIA (lower soon)

3.6:1 IIA Box x 2.88 Suffix B IIA Low x 4.7 Diffs

43:1 in the 110

3.65 LT85 first x 3.32 LT230 Low x 3.54 Diffs
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

MY45 wrote:
Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


What was the 40s crawl at dan?


60:1

And that was plenty to turn the 38s :cool:
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

what's with the massively low ratios?

crawl ratio does not take into account tyre size.

eg on my rig crawl ratio of 102 but i run 36" tyres with a massively underpowered 1.6ltr engine, i need the gearing.

I'm going to 39" tyres and will be looking at duals, gearing can make up fpr lack of power.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 7:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveS3 »

47.81

Stage 1 Land Rover Ute - but on Q78s.

Would like about 60ish to one.

Dave.
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 2:42 pm

Post by roc box »

im about 80 to 1 but im only running 32s crawls real nice :D
4 speed sierra box s3 rockhoppers 4.11 diffs
84 model hardtop, 86in wb, 36 iroks, locked front and rear, lux diffs, exo, power steer, fuel injected 4k corolla 1.3,auto transmission ,2in wheel spacers,3/4 elliptic rear
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Hekta wrote:54
Pajero 2.85 Transfer 4.88 diffs


Me too! :armsup:
Minion #1
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 8:18 pm
Location: Wollongong

Post by Surfection »

Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


This coming from you Mr 'I wanna lower my RC crawlers ratios even though they're perfect now' !!! :rofl:
Why not ? I doubt there'll be that many times that i'll want double low first gear but you never know, why not build it right the first time ? I believe the pirate guys are running high 100's or low 200's on their trail rigs these days, granted mine isn't a trail rig but meh... i wanna go sloooow !! ;) :lol:
Navigator for Amelia in the 2007 stroller pushing championships !!
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

Surfection wrote:
Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


This coming from you Mr 'I wanna lower my RC crawlers ratios even though they're perfect now' !!! :rofl:
Why not ? I doubt there'll be that many times that i'll want double low first gear but you never know, why not build it right the first time ? I believe the pirate guys are running high 100's or low 200's on their trail rigs these days, granted mine isn't a trail rig but meh... i wanna go sloooow !! ;) :lol:


RC and 1:1 are a little different :roll: RC is a one speed gearbox - most 1:1 have 4 or 5 speeds ;)

200 :shock: That is just wank factor :roll: Give me a situation where 200:1 is useful ?

So if I only have 60:1 I haven't built my rig right the first time ?
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

Shorty40 wrote:
Surfection wrote:
Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


This coming from you Mr 'I wanna lower my RC crawlers ratios even though they're perfect now' !!! :rofl:
Why not ? I doubt there'll be that many times that i'll want double low first gear but you never know, why not build it right the first time ? I believe the pirate guys are running high 100's or low 200's on their trail rigs these days, granted mine isn't a trail rig but meh... i wanna go sloooow !! ;) :lol:


RC and 1:1 are a little different :roll: RC is a one speed gearbox - most 1:1 have 4 or 5 speeds ;)

200 :shock: That is just wank factor :roll: Give me a situation where 200:1 is useful ?

So if I only have 60:1 I haven't built my rig right the first time ?


i have a spot were ur 60:1 and 38's would have u bouncing all over the place. mine at 108:1 on 33's could be lower there.
if u have a super low crawl ratio u can always change up gears but if your at 60:1 u cant change down to lower :finger:
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

meh i would be happy as larry with 60:1 :D

I am happy with my 28:1 just gotta use the brakes :D
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

sierrajim wrote: gearing can make up fpr lack of power.


No it cant!

When you dont have enough power you cant get Wheelspeed which a lot of obsticals need. I beleive of all the obsticals i have driven in Competition and in general driving most of them have needed wheelspeed rather than Crawling.


Im at Around 45-1 in my Buggy with an Auto. Most US Buggies are a little better at 50/60-1 with Autos. I do feel at times a little more ratio could help but not that often. The only reason i realy feel it would be an advantage to me is for a little more acceleration down low when trying to Bump up obsticals. Or throttling launches. Not so much for the slow crawling.
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

redzook wrote:
Shorty40 wrote:
Surfection wrote:
Shorty40 wrote:Whats with the MASSIVE low ratios ? 150+ ?

Whats the point ?


This coming from you Mr 'I wanna lower my RC crawlers ratios even though they're perfect now' !!! :rofl:
Why not ? I doubt there'll be that many times that i'll want double low first gear but you never know, why not build it right the first time ? I believe the pirate guys are running high 100's or low 200's on their trail rigs these days, granted mine isn't a trail rig but meh... i wanna go sloooow !! ;) :lol:


RC and 1:1 are a little different :roll: RC is a one speed gearbox - most 1:1 have 4 or 5 speeds ;)

200 :shock: That is just wank factor :roll: Give me a situation where 200:1 is useful ?

So if I only have 60:1 I haven't built my rig right the first time ?


i have a spot were ur 60:1 and 38's would have u bouncing all over the place. mine at 108:1 on 33's could be lower there.
if u have a super low crawl ratio u can always change up gears but if your at 60:1 u cant change down to lower :finger:


I still dont agree.

Its just cause you have a piss weak engine :finger:

I never once had an issue with gearing in my 40. Those who wheeled with me will attest to that ;)
Posts: 2492
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by bazzle »

Hoonz

Some GQs (Mavs) are 4.556 1st

Bazzle
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

Yes I've seen the disadvantages of a twin case in a Lux unable to accelerate (in 1st low) at the critical moment down an off camber steep hill and it rolled over.
Anything over 4:1 low range in an auto will pretty much overcome the brakes anyway this has been discussed many times on various US chat forums.
Also gearing will only compensate for a lack of power to a certain point especially for smaller motors.
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Rockingham W A

Post by duncan »

Gone to be about 118 to 1 zuk 5speed with 6.1s and 5.29 hiace diffs but these have to run 38s with the standard 1.3 zuk motor
Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 12:40 pm
Location: Redcliffe/Brisbane

Post by Timmy »

Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

ruff,

perhaps i should have said "sometimes gearing makes up for lack of horsepower"

eg on my rig in high 4 running 36" tyres on a slight uphill start it boggs down due to lack of power, put it in low and off you go.

I understand your thoughts on your comp buggy needing wheel speed, i too am going to build another rig with more power but as you know horsepower costs $$$.

On the zook gearing was just the more economical option.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
JK
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:00 am

Post by JK »

sierrajim wrote: perhaps i should have said "sometimes gearing makes up for lack of horsepower"


Nope.. should have said "gearing makes up for a lack of TORQUE"

For example, a torquey 4.2 turbo diesel GQ will be happier with standard ratios than the 4.2 petrol which develops it's torque higher in the rev range. The the petrol needs to rev higher to generate the same torque... so to crawl at the same speed with higher engine revs you need to gear it down.

To get good wheelspeed you need good power ie the engine needs to do a lot of work in a short amount of time (the definition power is work done relative to time).

Torque is the force with which the motor can turn the crankshaft.

Power is the ability of the motor to accelerate against some resistance.
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

I'm at 80:1 on 38.5's (or 39.5's)...

AX15 (manual) @ 3.83
AtlasII @ 4.3
Diffs @ 4.88

I rarely, if ever, wish I was geared lower. When I switch to an Auto I would like to be a bit higher (Tony's 60:1 suggestion with an auto would be bang on for my liking).

You can always choose a higher gear, that's true... but not in reverse (unless you have dual cases and stop to drop 1 case out every time you reverse).

S.
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests