Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Advice pls

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Advice pls

Post by mickrangie »

A few question for you all -

Where would I get the ball thingy from the photo attached and what is it called?

Is this better then std setup? Why? How?

I realise that it would allow the radius arm to manoeuvre a lot freer but would it move too freely?

Mick
www.online4x4.net
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

Rose joint???

I would assume it will allow more articulation and droop travel as it wont bind like a bush as the axle drops. It should also allow an adjustment in the radius arm lengths if you want that for whatever reason (alter the wheelbase, alter the pinion angle???)

Mate, I'm no expert.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 4:20 pm
Location: NZ

Post by lowbox »

To get the rear axle to droop more you need to reduce the limiting action of the bush at the chassis end of the trailing arms. You can do this a bit by bending the trailing arms, and do it even more by replacing the bush with a rose or heim joint. Or you could do both.
http://www.rovertym.com/heimrearlinks.htm
You can probably get the joints from an engineering supplies shop - make sure you get decent graded ones like those at:
http://www.bajaconcepts.com/heims&bushings.htm

This will free up the rear axle to droop until hit hits the next limiting factor - like your limit of your shock travel, or your spring comes out or...

And yup, too much droop can make you tippy. Also, there is lots of discussion about the merits of keeping the front and rear balanced so all the travel is not just at the rear. Don't claim to know the right answer to that one, still investigating it myself.
ct
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 8:06 pm
Location: Traralgon Vic Aust.

Post by DAZZ »

All IFS 4bys have all the travel at the rear. I'd like to know the answer to that as well!!!!
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

Generic name for ball thingy is spherical rod end (in UK some call them rose joints, in USA they call them heim joints).

Most bearing manufactures make them. There are many variations - study the specs, especially the static (Co) & dynamic (C) load ratings.

You can buy them from places that sell bearings, also good places that sell bolts often carry them.

They wear and when they become loose are noisy.

But you might find that you can't get them engineered for road use - check!
John
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 3:31 pm

Post by Strange Rover »

IMO there is nothing wrong with the stock rubber RR triangular bush. If you want to do anything with the rear links then just make them longer and mount the chassis mount up higher on the chassis so it doesent get hung up on rocks.

The stock rubber mount wont limit your travel before the centre A frame ball does. So changing to a heim IMO doesent achieve anything.

Sam
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by DiscoDino »

Sam is right. Not only should you ixtend them, but you should also creat a "kink" in them so that when you flex really and droooop one tire real low...niehter bush on the frame or the diff will bind...I found that this kink adds a LOT of "ease" for the tires to flex. My rear links have a 12 cm kink vertically and are 2cm extended to the rear. This is with an OME 2" lift.
LR Disco truggy:
42" Iroks, ZF, dual cases & ARBs, 30 splined, Longfielded, OMEs, Optimas, M8274-50s, Rockstomper rope & Bead-L
LR D-90 TD5 ST:
33" BFT AT, tuned, caged, 1/2 top
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Rear link

Post by HSV Rangie »

My rear links.
Cranked top match spring Lift and adjustable in lth.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

rear trailing arms

Post by GURU »

G'day,

I suggest you leave the chassis bush as it is (maybe moving it up as Sam said), but do bend them like HSV Rangie has. Don't bother with Hemi joints unless you plan to put a new suspension setup on your rangie, because your springs and shock will restrict your travel.

If your going to run hemi joints you will need to make a new A-frame which has a Hemi joint in it too, to get the best flex.

the last thing you will want is your spring hanging out all over the place
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Megaman »

You will also need to limit the amount of down travel as at full droop with heim joints and some traction the diff simple wants to drive under the car. The standard rover bush is a good median. Kinked arms work well but need to be strong.

Anyway you can get these parts from www.trailcraft.net.au
Megaman
______________________________________
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:00 pm
Location: Big Shed

Post by bobtail »

Megaman wrote:You will also need to limit the amount of down travel

Anyway you can get these parts from www.trailcraft.net.au



Or you can drive something a bit harder than the rock garden at woollies.And they will bend the same as the picture .Fancy selling bent arms SHONKY Dudelux,S :!: :!: Do what sam said you wont get hung up again ,you will with bent arms .
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests