Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

5 Link front on a buggy

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

N*A*M wrote:
DeWsE wrote:If I do need a panhard rod, would I be correct in saying that rod needs to be the same length and parallel to the steering to stop binding?


not bind but bump steer


Okay so how important would in be offroad at slow speeds? Would I loose my thumbs without it?
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

If the 4 links on a 5 link setup are equal length and parrallel will they still bind?
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

Slunnie wrote:If the 4 links on a 5 link setup are equal length and parrallel will they still bind?


yes because they are still goin to try to twist the housing as it flexes
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

Off road at slow speed triangulated 4 link wouldn't bump steer so to speak, but as it flexes the wheels will turn (steer)... so to stay going straight ahead you have to turn the steering wheel one way or another to compensate as you are flexing... then back as you flex in the other direction.

Trust me, I used to run a 4 link front.

If a 5 link is designed well you will get heaps of flex before it binds - enough for a 14 or 16" travel shock/coilover/airshock.

Other thing to consider is roll centre and roll axis. Alot more buggies are going to 4 link (2 lower control arms, 1 upper and a panhard) with a high and flat axel mount on the panhard - higher on the rear than on the front so that the roll axis slopes slightly forward.

Oh, baiscally when using a panhard and 3 or 4 link the roll centre is half way down the length of the panhard, and the closer the roll axs is to the COG the less body roll you get in off camber.

One more for now - triangulating your lowers slightly will reduce (eliminate) rear steer (or front steer for a front application) during articulation. The angle and connection points of the lowers and uppers also effect the amount of squat or anti-squat under acceleration...

Rambling now, sorry, I'm outa here.

S.
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

FireTruck wrote:Off road at slow speed triangulated 4 link wouldn't bump steer so to speak, but as it flexes the wheels will turn (steer)... so to stay going straight ahead you have to turn the steering wheel one way or another to compensate as you are flexing... then back as you flex in the other direction.

Trust me, I used to run a 4 link front.

If a 5 link is designed well you will get heaps of flex before it binds - enough for a 14 or 16" travel shock/coilover/airshock.

Other thing to consider is roll centre and roll axis. Alot more buggies are going to 4 link (2 lower control arms, 1 upper and a panhard) with a high and flat axel mount on the panhard - higher on the rear than on the front so that the roll axis slopes slightly forward.

Oh, baiscally when using a panhard and 3 or 4 link the roll centre is half way down the length of the panhard, and the closer the roll axs is to the COG the less body roll you get in off camber.

One more for now - triangulating your lowers slightly will reduce (eliminate) rear steer (or front steer for a front application) during articulation. The angle and connection points of the lowers and uppers also effect the amount of squat or anti-squat under acceleration...

Rambling now, sorry, I'm outa here.

S.


correct me if i am wrong but i thought the front and rear each had there own roll axis and u determined the roll axis buy drawing a line throught the instant center and half way throught the panhard? (3 link with panhard)
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

got me there... more research required for me... I thought that the roll axis was for the entire vehicle, and was the axis you get when joining the roll centre of each axel.. ?
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

You are both correct. There are 3 roll axii.

1 for each axle and the 3rd which FireTruck was referring to.
John
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

Cool - both right, I like it... still obviously need to do some research on this stuff though...
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 1595
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Warner, Brisbane Nth

Post by Spartacus »

i bit of a dig but i need advice.

im upgrading from leaf springs all round and currently investigating suspension set ups for QLD/NSW competitions.

ie: 3 link & panhard front
4 link triangulated rear
normal high steer getup or similar

would this setup suit rockcrawling, tufftruck, superior allterrain challenge
competitions
MULL
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: warner, brisbane

Post by chunderlicious »

id be interested to know the same thing. mull didnt i start this about our disagreement? i thought i did
turbos are nice but i'd rather be blown
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests