Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

New Vitara Launched

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Forum rules
Post Reply
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

New Vitara Launched

Post by fightara »

Now with IRS too :roll:

Not quite as bad as a RAV4, think it's sort of in the Nissan X-Trail market.



Yay. :?

http://www.auto123.com/en/info/news/new ... 41570&pg=1
Top
Posts: 2910
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:32 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by -Mick- »

ho



mo



:roll:
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

kjhfkljads

Post by SiKiD_01 »

new vit, yay
no low range, Grimace
diesel engine variant, yay
monocoque body/chassis, Grimace
H.I.D headlights, yay
Stability control, Grimace
Sat Nav, yay
looks like Rav, Grimace.

even tho its a Suzuki, i think they got it all wrong. apparently
The new Escudo (vit) should be as capable off-road as the old one
somehow, i'm not sure at all. IFS was bad enough, and now IRS. Geeeezus.
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

hmmmm


Grimace.

Looks very RAV4 ish at the rear

Grimace
Image
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Top
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Contact:
Contact Beastmavster

Post by Beastmavster »

No low range, IFS and now IRS, monocque chassis.

I can see a huge sales success to women with prams.

Hope suzuki goes belly up with this offroad mega flop. Stay away in droves.
Top
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Re: kjhfkljads

Post by fightara »

SiKiD_01 wrote:new vit, yay
no low range, Grimace
diesel engine variant, yay
monocoque body/chassis, Grimace
H.I.D headlights, yay
Stability control, Grimace
Sat Nav, yay
looks like Rav, Grimace.

even tho its a Suzuki, i think they got it all wrong. apparently
The new Escudo (vit) should be as capable off-road as the old one
somehow, i'm not sure at all. IFS was bad enough, and now IRS. Geeeezus.
I thought I read something about retaining a ladder frame chassis?
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

fdsafdds

Post by SiKiD_01 »

thats what i thought the new vit would have, well, at least the ladder frame chassis. apparently thats what all the hype was about.
From concept to production, only a few minor changes have been made, including less aggressive front and rear air dams, reworked details such as lighting and mirrors to meet local market requirements and the Grimace transition from ladder frame chassis to a monocoque design.
well, suzuki seem to be going down hill from here, and with no low range, $h!t, better keep clear.
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

ggsdgdsfg

Post by SiKiD_01 »

this is a little better, but....

http://www.zukiworld.com/cgi/yabb/YaBB. ... 1118545039
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 6:07 am
Location: SEQ

Post by munga »

heh, saw pics of that about 6 weeks ago..
[we make components for it where i work]

wait till you see the new sierra looking thing ..

:cool:
ht zook with bog, rust and mt's

this is my wheelbase |<-------->|
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

vcxvzxcvxzc

Post by SiKiD_01 »

munga wrote:
wait till you see the new sierra looking thing ..
new sierra looking thing ay? seems anything else will be better than the new vit.

got pics?
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Re: vcxvzxcvxzc

Post by zookwithdreams »

SiKiD_01 wrote:
munga wrote:
wait till you see the new sierra looking thing ..
new sierra looking thing ay? seems anything else will be better than the new vit.

got pics?
Pics Pics Pics
Top
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Post by stumped »

munga wrote:heh, saw pics of that about 6 weeks ago..
[we make components for it where i work]

wait till you see the new sierra looking thing ..

:cool:
what's it like? new version of jimny?? any info?
___,,,,_('o')_,,,,____
part of the newy conspiracy...
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

Who says it has no low range :roll: Low is 1.970:1

Still can't believe Suzuki are still persisting in rear drum brakes :bad-words:
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Contact:
Contact Gwagensteve

Post by Gwagensteve »

cj wrote:Who says it has no low range :roll: Low is 1.970:1
Like he said.... no low range :rofl: :rofl:
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

Gwagensteve wrote:
cj wrote:Who says it has no low range :roll: Low is 1.970:1
Like he said.... no low range :rofl: :rofl:
Well it's better than Suzuki have ever offered in a Vit or GV and it's about the same as the new manual Jimny(2.000:1). I suppose it's trying to find something good to say about it given all the other "features":armsup: :armsup:
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Contact:
Contact Beastmavster

Post by Beastmavster »

Depends on what the diff ratios are..... if it's 5.12's still then it's something like 11% better than current.

If the diffs are something sucky like 4.6's lets just hope the 5.12's can still go in there.

Even so... monocoque chassis and IRS :(
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

The 2.7 gets 4.3's just like the XL-7 and the 2.0 manual gets 3.909 while the 2.0 auto gets 5.125
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

vcxvzxcv

Post by SiKiD_01 »

cj wrote: the 2.0 manual gets 3.909 while the 2.0 auto gets 5.125

hmmm, i always thought that the autos would have a higher diff ratio than the manuals. is the auto a 5 speed? i wonder why they use the different gearing? gear box ratios? if both are the same 2.0lt engine, the only explaination would be gbox ratios?
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

The 2.0 gets a 4spd auto and the 2.7 gets the same 5 speed as in the current XL-7. The manual gets a 4.550 1st gear, the 4 speed auto gets 2.826 in 1st and the 5 speed auto has a 3.520 1st gear.
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

fdsafads

Post by SiKiD_01 »

hmmm...

2.0 lt, manual 1st, 4.550, low range, 1.970, and swap in the 5.125 diff ratios.

dont have a crawl calculator handy, but thats pretty low i would think. front and rear air lockers, and IFS/IRS is history.

do you think, instead of bustin 2 CVs all the time, you would be bustin 4?
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

The rear has a centred diff so if it has CV's with the same operating range as the front then the travel at the wheel will be better but that's still not to say it will be great travel. No ARB for this I reckon but traction control could be fitted. No crawler gears likely for the 2.7 if it is running the same setup as the XL-7 due to a different size input shaft
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 3076
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 7:09 am
Location: web wheelin' from sydney

Re: fdsafads

Post by stumped »

SiKiD_01 wrote:hmmm...

2.0 lt, manual 1st, 4.550, low range, 1.970, and swap in the 5.125 diff ratios.

dont have a crawl calculator handy, but thats pretty low i would think. front and rear air lockers, and IFS/IRS is history.

do you think, instead of bustin 2 CVs all the time, you would be bustin 4?
assuming i put in the right figures... 45.9379375( :D ) 1st low
http://www.izook.com/gearcalc.htm
___,,,,_('o')_,,,,____
part of the newy conspiracy...
Top
Posts: 1732
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:12 am
Location: Roof, side, end, sometimes wheels

Post by ljxtreem »

New vitara = Ghay
I mean Grey
Yeah it comes in grey


Mock :D
My photographic Art http://www.redbubble.com/people/ljxtreem

www.dirtcomp.com.au

Sierrajim wrote:
So hurry up, come back, buy a Lada (can't believe i just said that) and we'll go wheelin'.
Top
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 6:07 am
Location: SEQ

Post by munga »

yeah 1.5 twincam similar size to the old vitara but looks to have a more ummm agricultural appearance. love to show pics, but i need to pay the bills :)
ht zook with bog, rust and mt's

this is my wheelbase |<-------->|
Top
Posts: 1087
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Darwin N.T.

fdafsdf

Post by SiKiD_01 »

is the suzuki caribian new or old?

http://www.suzuki.co.id/

edit: ok i think its just another name for a maruti or lwb?

http://www.bangkokpost.com/290405_Motor ... otor54.php
1995 Vitara:
stock standard


WWW.DARWIN4X4.NET
Top
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

Just reading that they used a lightweight casting for the rear diff and we all know how well that turned out when they did that for the front diffs :bad-words:

http://4x4singapore.com/index.php?optio ... 5&Itemid=2

(story based on Suzuki in-house product info)
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Top
Posts: 4225
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: sunshine coast australia

Contact:
Contact mud4b

Re: fdafsdf

Post by mud4b »

SiKiD_01 wrote:is the suzuki caribian new or old?

http://www.suzuki.co.id/

edit: ok i think its just another name for a maruti or lwb?

http://www.bangkokpost.com/290405_Motor ... otor54.php
i am (and have been) in the process of trying to import these into aus...
Mud4b/ OPT, Cheap rates, Not cheap work. Search Opt- option offroad on facebook. Call or Sms 0439609525.. Sunshine coast, Eudlo, 4554.
Top
Posts: 5226
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Contact:
Contact Squik

Post by Squik »

It's like the new Jimny having push button transfer options.....

ooooo goodie!!! More electronics to get wet and not work....yaaaay!! :roll:
DRS smells like a cat-food milkshake... and wet socks... and gorgonzola cheese... all whizzed up in a blender
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Suzuki”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests