front is more effective when you have good traction under at least one front wheel and no traction under either back wheel - eg driving out of a pond, or driv ing from mud onto rocks. sometimes front-only is good for climbing rocks if you still have both back wheels on the ground.RAY185 wrote:Ultimately that is what I see myself doing. I was just very interested in hearing when and why it is better in either end. So far I am convinced that it is more beneficial in the rear, but I am waiting for someone to paint me a picture of when a front is more effective than a rear.dumbdunce wrote:I say rear, but hey, it's a 40, both the diffs are the same, it's only a couple of hours work to swap them, so stick it in the front, go attack your favourite rock hill, go home, swap them over, attack the same track with it in the back, make an objectove comparison, then decide if the front or rear is better.
an easier way to do the comparison is to find a mate with a twin-locked truck and drive the same, hard track with front locker only, then rear locker only, to see which is best - but the rsult is only valid for that truck on that trail. different situations demand different lockings. just save up and get both, you know you want to.