Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Strenghtening R380
Moderator: Micka
Strenghtening R380
I know this question has been asked BUT i have to ask it and would love Daddylonglegs to give a response.
I have a 1994 110 300tdi which has aftermarket turbo's etc to achieve about many times the torque (523nm) and about 224HP which also depends on ambient temps. I am on the second gearbox and want to rebuild the current one to handle the power. I don't drive like a hoon but I do tow land rovers and big boats long distance eg 1000+ klms at a time. So I NEED to get the r380 and transfer case to handle it. SO please HELP
I have a 1994 110 300tdi which has aftermarket turbo's etc to achieve about many times the torque (523nm) and about 224HP which also depends on ambient temps. I am on the second gearbox and want to rebuild the current one to handle the power. I don't drive like a hoon but I do tow land rovers and big boats long distance eg 1000+ klms at a time. So I NEED to get the r380 and transfer case to handle it. SO please HELP
Aussie blokes love hard work, they can watch it all day!
Isnt the Santana LT85 stronger than LT77 and R380.or an LT95 4 speed would be the best bet of land Rover boxes. thats why the army went to a n LT95 and 230 transfer combo.
BUT all gearboxes have max torque figures. maybe you need a Nissan conversion or New process.
A ZF certainly wouldn't take that torque but a 727 Chrysler maybe would.
Regards Philip A
BUT all gearboxes have max torque figures. maybe you need a Nissan conversion or New process.
A ZF certainly wouldn't take that torque but a 727 Chrysler maybe would.
Regards Philip A
Yes, the LT85 is stronger than the R380, but they are not exceptionally common and reasonably expensive to rebuild.Philip A wrote:Isnt the Santana LT85 stronger than LT77 and R380.or an LT95 4 speed would be the best bet of land Rover boxes.
thats why the army went to a n LT95 and 230 transfer combo.
Where did you hear that? All the first batch of perenties had an LT95 with a strengthened T-case (better bearings, etc), but still an LT95. AFAIK the last batch made in the early-mid 90's had the same - never an LT230.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Some history from top of my head:
R380 designation comes from Rover 380 Nm (or is it ft lbf ?) torque.
R380 was intended to be stronger than the LT77 that it replaced. Larger bearings, wider gears, better arrangement with 5th and reverse.
But rover stuffed up with the 1st generation and introduced some bad stress raisers on the main shaft which is prone to break. This gave the R380 a bad name that hasn't shaken from some minds.
2nd generation fixed the stress raiser problem and had some other changes to increase the strength.
3rd generation came out shortly after and is stronger again.
You can tell which is which from the suffix letter in the serial number, 1st is suffix J, then suffix K, last is suffix L.
If your R380 does not have an oil cooler, you should add one as they get pretty hot.
To add a cooler, you need the thermatic valve that bolts to the left hand side of the gearbox case, suitable fittings, hoses, pipes and a cooler. The same valve was also used on some LT77 boxes.
Rover only relied on heat dissipation from the pipes that run from the gearbox to the front, then back to the gearbox. The military Wolf version has a proper oil cooler however.
R380 designation comes from Rover 380 Nm (or is it ft lbf ?) torque.
R380 was intended to be stronger than the LT77 that it replaced. Larger bearings, wider gears, better arrangement with 5th and reverse.
But rover stuffed up with the 1st generation and introduced some bad stress raisers on the main shaft which is prone to break. This gave the R380 a bad name that hasn't shaken from some minds.
2nd generation fixed the stress raiser problem and had some other changes to increase the strength.
3rd generation came out shortly after and is stronger again.
You can tell which is which from the suffix letter in the serial number, 1st is suffix J, then suffix K, last is suffix L.
If your R380 does not have an oil cooler, you should add one as they get pretty hot.
To add a cooler, you need the thermatic valve that bolts to the left hand side of the gearbox case, suitable fittings, hoses, pipes and a cooler. The same valve was also used on some LT77 boxes.
Rover only relied on heat dissipation from the pipes that run from the gearbox to the front, then back to the gearbox. The military Wolf version has a proper oil cooler however.
John
They used a LT230 on 2 that i know of - also both had a part time conversion as wellmodman wrote:lra (rangie spares) used to do a gq 5 speed conversion on range rovers.
i don't know whether they used the lt230 transfer though.
that 5 speed has a deeper first than rovers i think?
might be the go
david
Dave.
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
I would agree with Bush 65,Bush65 wrote:Some history from top of my head:
R380 designation comes from Rover 380 Nm (or is it ft lbf ?) torque.
R380 was intended to be stronger than the LT77 that it replaced. Larger bearings, wider gears, better arrangement with 5th and reverse.
But rover stuffed up with the 1st generation and introduced some bad stress raisers on the main shaft which is prone to break. This gave the R380 a bad name that hasn't shaken from some minds.
2nd generation fixed the stress raiser problem and had some other changes to increase the strength.
3rd generation came out shortly after and is stronger again.
You can tell which is which from the suffix letter in the serial number, 1st is suffix J, then suffix K, last is suffix L.
If your R380 does not have an oil cooler, you should add one as they get pretty hot.
To add a cooler, you need the thermatic valve that bolts to the left hand side of the gearbox case, suitable fittings, hoses, pipes and a cooler. The same valve was also used on some LT77 boxes.
Rover only relied on heat dissipation from the pipes that run from the gearbox to the front, then back to the gearbox. The military Wolf version has a proper oil cooler however.
best option is a suffix L and an oil cooler,
I have some more R 380 info in the tech section on our web site,
Dave
www.ashcroft-transmissions.co.uk
www.ashcroft-transmissions.co.uk
land rover australia put the strongest of the R380 boxes in my truck before I bought it but I have managed to kill it.
ps. Don't like the idea of buying a new f350 just to do the highway work and keeping my fender for offroad as that would be a bit out of my budget so please don't reckomend that
thanks for the info so far fellers.
PPs is it at all possible to nitride and machine some stronger parts for the R380 Just like we do for building racing gearbox's
PPPs Ashcroft do the Bowler rover guy's use use any rover boxes in there racing trucks?
ps. Don't like the idea of buying a new f350 just to do the highway work and keeping my fender for offroad as that would be a bit out of my budget so please don't reckomend that
thanks for the info so far fellers.
PPs is it at all possible to nitride and machine some stronger parts for the R380 Just like we do for building racing gearbox's
PPPs Ashcroft do the Bowler rover guy's use use any rover boxes in there racing trucks?
Aussie blokes love hard work, they can watch it all day!
Re army .
I was told by a mechanic at Trivett Rover who is the son of a good friend that the latest army batch has an LT95 box with the tranfer case machined off and a HD LT230 fitted. I wondered why they would go to such trouble but didn't really question him closely about it. He claimed he had worked on them.
Regards Philip A
I was told by a mechanic at Trivett Rover who is the son of a good friend that the latest army batch has an LT95 box with the tranfer case machined off and a HD LT230 fitted. I wondered why they would go to such trouble but didn't really question him closely about it. He claimed he had worked on them.
Regards Philip A
Andrew actually was seling the GQ 5 speed and LT230 out of his vehicle a few months back. I think he was asking $3,500, maybe give LRA a call you you are interested.modman wrote:lra (rangie spares) used to do a gq 5 speed conversion on range rovers.
i don't know whether they used the lt230 transfer though.
that 5 speed has a deeper first than rovers i think?
might be the go
david
Jason
TIGGR6 - Got the plates but not the car...
Every one I've been under has LT95, incuding the latest IIMV's 6x6 that where built mid/late 90's. There are some 110/defenders floating around though? but I thought they where standards civi models repainted for an army trial.Philip A wrote:Re army .
I was told by a mechanic at Trivett Rover who is the son of a good friend that the latest army batch has an LT95 box with the tranfer case machined off and a HD LT230 fitted. I wondered why they would go to such trouble but didn't really question him closely about it. He claimed he had worked on them.
Regards Philip A
Thonger
Nick B wrote:thanks mate
When you see him can you get the measurments for the Jeep transfer to lt230 twin transfer setup and all the parts I need to do it, as an engineer mate of mine will do the machine work for me when the Box and Transfer are out.
You mean underdrive
Search on the topic, Bill has covered it in detail - he is also pretty busy ATM.
Dave.
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests