Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
maths on shockies
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
maths on shockies
hey guys, was wondering how to figure out the static load reduction on shockies when you move them closer to the center of the axel, and wat are some ideas to compensate for the loss in control over spring rebound? oh im useing a 339-690 (round about mesurement) efs gq patrol shock
[b][i][u][color=#0000BF] just another nutter with a hilux [/color][/u][/i][/b]
Re: maths on shockies
Can’t know the specific answer to your questionTYLER wrote:hey guys, was wondering how to figure out the static load reduction on shockies when you move them closer to the center of the axel, and wat are some ideas to compensate for the loss in control over spring rebound? oh im useing a 339-690 (round about mesurement) efs gq patrol shock
But when I moved my shocks in i got some adjustable that way I can compensate at the turn of a dial.
Eric
PICS WORK JUST CLICK the black box
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
78 scout 392ci V8 LPG, 727 TF, dana 20, dana 44 locked and loaded, 9" rear Diff. 10inch lift'n'so on
Re: maths on shockies
What sort of shocks are those?? How long can you get them and how much $$ am i going to part with?? They look a little tougher than the rancho adjustablesscout392 wrote:
But when I moved my shocks in i got some adjustable that way I can compensate at the turn of a dial.![]()
Eric
PICS WORK JUST CLICK the black box
GU 4.2 TD Garrett BB Hi-flow, M8274 + Bells & Whistles with plenty of fruit still on the list!
[b][color=red]\ m / ( > . < ) \ m /[/color][/b]
[b][color=red]\ m / ( > . < ) \ m /[/color][/b]
What you need to work out is the change in damping due to the decreased shock movement for the same amount of spring compression.
e.g.
Assume you originally had vertically mounted shocks (move the same amount as the springs). So when the spring is compressed 3" the shock is compressed 3".
If you them angle the shocks in you need to use pythagoras's theorem C=sqrt(A^2+B^2) where C, A and B are the hypotenuse, opposite and adjacent sides of a right angle triangle respectively, to work out how much their damping is reduced.
If you draw a vertical line where the shock used to be, then a horizontal line throughthat line to the top eye of the shock, then finally a third line along the shock direction until it meets the vertical line - you now have the triangle you need.
Put in some reasonable dimensions for your setup, and work out the length of C - the hypotenuse (where the shock is). Then reduce the length of the vertical line by a fixed amount - say 3", keep the horizontal the same, and re-calculate C. Previously your shock would have moved 3" for 3" of spring movement, now it moves by the difference in C instead, which will probably be in the order of 0.5-0.75 times the spring movement - depending on angle.
Note that the damping ability of a shock is proportional to how quickly it moves. Your shock will now be moving slower as it is covering less distance, so the actual reduction in damping will be even more than calculated by the above method - another 10% would be a rough guess.
e.g.
Assume you originally had vertically mounted shocks (move the same amount as the springs). So when the spring is compressed 3" the shock is compressed 3".
If you them angle the shocks in you need to use pythagoras's theorem C=sqrt(A^2+B^2) where C, A and B are the hypotenuse, opposite and adjacent sides of a right angle triangle respectively, to work out how much their damping is reduced.
If you draw a vertical line where the shock used to be, then a horizontal line throughthat line to the top eye of the shock, then finally a third line along the shock direction until it meets the vertical line - you now have the triangle you need.
Put in some reasonable dimensions for your setup, and work out the length of C - the hypotenuse (where the shock is). Then reduce the length of the vertical line by a fixed amount - say 3", keep the horizontal the same, and re-calculate C. Previously your shock would have moved 3" for 3" of spring movement, now it moves by the difference in C instead, which will probably be in the order of 0.5-0.75 times the spring movement - depending on angle.
Note that the damping ability of a shock is proportional to how quickly it moves. Your shock will now be moving slower as it is covering less distance, so the actual reduction in damping will be even more than calculated by the above method - another 10% would be a rough guess.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Re: maths on shockies
Explorer Pro Comp MX6 monotube adjustable shock absorberbenhl wrote:What sort of shocks are those?? How long can you get them and how much $$ am i going to part with?? They look a little tougher than the rancho adjustablesscout392 wrote:
But when I moved my shocks in i got some adjustable that way I can compensate at the turn of a dial.![]()
Eric
PICS WORK JUST CLICK the black box
Mine rears about COMP14.000 EXT22.625 TRAV8.625
Fronts are about COMP15.250 EXT25.250 TRAV10.000
About $700 a set of 4 with shock boots to match 4x4
6 way adjustable upside down set up.
Eric
PS scout STILL not on the road so i have not tested this set up
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
78 scout 392ci V8 LPG, 727 TF, dana 20, dana 44 locked and loaded, 9" rear Diff. 10inch lift'n'so on
cheers for the maths on that, so would using a heavier shock compansate for the loss in control EG a shock like a gq patrol shock insted of a hilux shock, reasion for askin is because ive got a hevy set of shock on er and i would think it would smooth out the ride!
[b][i][u][color=#0000BF] just another nutter with a hilux [/color][/u][/i][/b]
If you calculate the difference by the method I mentioned above, then you need to increase the compression and rebound of the shock by the difference in travel, plus about 10%.TYLER wrote:oh ok, but wat if they are on a 66.5 drgree slope and moved inward about 300mm?same rule applies?
So for example - if your shock only travels 50% of the distance that the factory shock would travel for the same wheel movement, then you need a shock with about 220% the damping of the original.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
If you are interested in getting a set of those Procomp MX6's just send me a pm 'EDIT' but there is only a 20% variance of adjustment so you would need to get the valving perfect to start with so it defeats the purpose, you may as well get the es 9000's Procomps.
I hate tough dog for their leaking a breaking probs but they have a good warranty. They might be your best bet for what you want.
What I think you should do is set the rear up to take 2 shocks on each corner.
Shane
I hate tough dog for their leaking a breaking probs but they have a good warranty. They might be your best bet for what you want.
What I think you should do is set the rear up to take 2 shocks on each corner.
Shane
We sell SUSPENSION - PRICES on
https://www.suspensionstuff.com.au" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Free Freight 1300 048 991
FLEXY COILS - Superior Engineering - TIGERZ11 - Tough Dog - PROCOMP - Polyair - ETC
https://www.suspensionstuff.com.au" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Free Freight 1300 048 991
FLEXY COILS - Superior Engineering - TIGERZ11 - Tough Dog - PROCOMP - Polyair - ETC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests