Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Not this again - Tube/Pipe sizes for competition cages

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply

How would you build it?


32NB - Use cheap, available pipe, but does not meet all codes
6
26%
1.75" - Uses less widely available tube, bender options also limited
2
9%
40NB - Pipe availability good, heavier than required, therefore also more expensive, but covers all comp size requirements
11
48%
Other
4
17%
 
Total votes: 23

Posts: 2031
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 10:49 am
Location: On a mission...

Not this again - Tube/Pipe sizes for competition cages

Post by Damo »

I've been doing a bit of searching and reading on this topic, and there is quite a bit on this board been said already. From what i've found there is basically two 'standards' out there:

1. 1.5" x .120 (38mm OD x 3mm wall). As can be used in WeRock and OzRock. The popular 32NB meets this standard.

2. 1.75" x .090 (44.45mm OD x 2.5mm wall). As specified by CCDA, Qld Transport and the draft version National Code of Practice for Light Vehicle Construction and Modification. 32NB doesn't meet this standard (strictly speaking) as it's only 42.2mm OD. AND i'm not sure if you can get pipe in the required CDS or CDW material.

One way to get around this is may be to just go with 40NB, which is pretty big (48.3mm OD). So there is a weight penalty, and more steel = more cost. BUT according to CCDA they want CDS or CDW, and i'm not sure if that's available in pipe.

So for the guy that wants to build a cage, and keep his options open what does he do???

NOTE: I have been pretty careful in making sure that what i've written here is correct. If you know that something is wrong PLEASE let me know and I will change it. I am hoping that we can compile some information and have a definitive source of info that allows people to make an informed choice.

Pre-emptive strike on some questions...
NB = nominal bore
OD = outside diameter
CDS = cold drawn seamless
CDW = cold drawn welded
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Re: Not this again - Tube/Pipe sizes for competition cages

Post by Tiny »

Damo wrote:
Pre-emptive strike on some questions...
NB = nominal bore
OD = outside diameter
CDS = cold drawn seamless
CDW = cold drawn welded
bwaaaahahaha :armsup: :armsup: :armsup:

voted 44.5
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
User avatar
jav
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: walloon, queensland

Post by jav »

hydralic pipe is seamless, therefore stronger i think, it's avaliable in heaps of different sizes.
Posts: 722
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 9:31 pm
Location: Berwick, Melbourne

Post by awill4x4 »

jav wrote:hydralic pipe is seamless, therefore stronger i think, it's avaliable in heaps of different sizes.
Yeah, and this is where a lot of people get caught out because hydraulic tube is usually annealed as well so it's as soft as buggery. We've had chassis' in at work to straighten and when we used the porta power to push them back they were like plasticine with no real strength to speak of.
If you go "cold drawn" (cdw) then go for tubing like "Racetec 350" (which is just a brand name) If your in Sydney there's about 3 suppliers there who can supply "chassis grade" CDW. British International, Performance Metals and Rod Andrews. My pick here is Performance Metals, we deal with Mathew Maude there and he's a good guy to deal with.
Regards Andrew.
We are Tig welders, gravity doesn't worry us.
[img]http://www.studmonkeyracing.com/forums/smilies/weld.gif[/img]
Posts: 4426
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by bru21 »

there seems to be a perpetual cloud of worry over this topic wher there needent be. build it right to meet the codes and it will be plenty strong enough. i would use off the shelf steel as 1 they can't tell and 2 its mpa is not far off and how many times have you seen pipe split etc and 99% of the time it will be migged with whatever is in the gun that resembles steel (just look jow mig welding rusts and see the impure steel) i used off the shelf 38od with a seam for the whole internal (b pillar 48.3 x 3mm) which is just for show (qld comps don't recognise exo's) as i have an exo made of 48.3x3mm 8 point. the internal in mine weighs next to nothing. the big mistake people make with cages as they use small diameter in thick walls. 48.3 x 1.6 (50.8 x 1.6 is the available size) is prob heaps stronger than 38 x 5mm except where crushing against rocks etc is concerned. the second mustake i see a lot of people do is get obsessed with the weight. a cage has what comes down to say 2 lenghts of tube. in 48.3 the difference in thickness vs weight is about 6 kg a length from memory from 2.4 to 3.2 as the thickness moves to the inside and fill a reduced diameter thus doubling the thickness does not double the weight.

lastly i have seen so many with 8-10mm base plates. that is far weaker then a thinner one as the flex cracking is a big problem. legally you can only weld metal 1.5 x the thickness to a chassis or body etc.
ADHD Racing would like to thank
Mrs Bru @ Sunshine Coast Developmental Physiotherapy - www.scdphysio.com.au , Ryano @ Fourbys www.generaltire.com.au Blitzkrieg Motorsport
Posts: 1732
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:12 am
Location: Roof, side, end, sometimes wheels

Post by ljxtreem »

DOM 1.75 inch, 1.5 inch

Mock :D
My photographic Art http://www.redbubble.com/people/ljxtreem

www.dirtcomp.com.au

Sierrajim wrote:
So hurry up, come back, buy a Lada (can't believe i just said that) and we'll go wheelin'.
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by GQ Bear »

Getting off track a wee bit, does anyone know if there are min/max specs in relation to how close to pillars, roof, occupants heads,etc when it comes to cages? if so what are they? and is rubber cushioning required or optional?

thanks


NOTE: I have been pretty careful in making sure that what i've written here is correct. If you know that something is wrong PLEASE let me know and I will change it. I am hoping that we can compile some information and have a definitive source of info that allows people to make an informed choice.

can't wait to read it Damo, let us know when your finished :cool:
[color=violet]G[/color][color=white]O[/color][color=yellow] S[/color][color=blue]T[/color][color=yellow]O[/color][color=white]R[/color][color=violet]M[/color]
Premiers 1999, 2007, 2009
Spoon 2010
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

go to the CCDA site for the specs on CCDA sanctioned events or get hold of a CAM book, depends on what class though
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

cage specs

Post by davejb »

Vicroads web site has the specs on cages for rego requirements in Victoria
Dave
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by GQ Bear »

ta
[color=violet]G[/color][color=white]O[/color][color=yellow] S[/color][color=blue]T[/color][color=yellow]O[/color][color=white]R[/color][color=violet]M[/color]
Premiers 1999, 2007, 2009
Spoon 2010
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests