Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
coilly serria handling
coilly serria handling
if u were to left it enough to put 31 under would it handle way better than a leaf or just similar
similar. They ride alot nicer due to the coils, but as with any 4wd, when you lift it you compromise onroad performane. you will get more bodyroll through corners, and it will tend to 'Dive' when on brakes.
Do a virtual lift, 2" coils, and fit some GOOD shocks, ( like koni's) and maybe stick to 30's, and you will have a good balance between onroad performance, and offroad ability.
JMO
Pete
Do a virtual lift, 2" coils, and fit some GOOD shocks, ( like koni's) and maybe stick to 30's, and you will have a good balance between onroad performance, and offroad ability.
JMO
Pete
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
IMHO not really any better than leaf. Thay are newer and there are a whole heap of little changes that made them tighter and quieter, so all up they seem a lot more refined. The steering is a bit better because there is less squish via the shackles etc but all up there's not much in it.
when you add the added complications of the coiler - inadeqate rear roll stiffness, weak bracketry, chain drive transfer poor locker availablility etc, they don't really stack up as a starting point, but I know that others think differently.
Steve.
when you add the added complications of the coiler - inadeqate rear roll stiffness, weak bracketry, chain drive transfer poor locker availablility etc, they don't really stack up as a starting point, but I know that others think differently.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
I agree with this totally!! But as a daily driver, and reasy weekender, they are far nicer. If you want to wheel it hard, the the coiler if definately the most expensive way to go.Gwagensteve wrote:IMHO not really any better than leaf. Thay are newer and there are a whole heap of little changes that made them tighter and quieter, so all up they seem a lot more refined. The steering is a bit better because there is less squish via the shackles etc but all up there's not much in it.
when you add the added complications of the coiler - inadeqate rear roll stiffness, weak bracketry, chain drive transfer poor locker availablility etc, they don't really stack up as a starting point, but I know that others think differently.
Steve.
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
I am one of those.Gwagensteve wrote:IMHO not really any better than leaf. Thay are newer and there are a whole heap of little changes that made them tighter and quieter, so all up they seem a lot more refined. The steering is a bit better because there is less squish via the shackles etc but all up there's not much in it.
when you add the added complications of the coiler - inadeqate rear roll stiffness, weak bracketry, chain drive transfer poor locker availablility etc, they don't really stack up as a starting point, but I know that others think differently.
Steve.
Firstly ive ridden in a few leaf sprung zooks and then jumped back into mine. Im so glad i bought a coily, ride is SOOOOO much smoother, giving it better touring ability. Another benefit is the flex you can get out of the coils.
As for locker availabilty - They use the same rear diff as SJ70's however the front diff is different.
The biggest problem running 30's or 31's is your Low range crawling abilty. Forget about crawling unless you want to consider buying a set of rockhoppers.
'04 NP DiD Pajero: 2" Lift, 33's, ARB Bar, XD9000 Winch, Rear ARB Locker, Snorkel, Dual Batts and Much More...
show us your flexig shots. Coilers wont flex much better then a leaf spring zook without major suspension overhaul. a combination of anti squat, limited front flex, short wheelbase and no rear roll stiffness leads to the front unloading weight on climbs. I was forever trying to get weight forward with mine.
[url]http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum[/url]
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)
Contact:
2nd this opinion deffinatley. And a coiler is much more unbalances, with the rear flexing heaps more, and lacking roll stiffness. making the car feel unbalanced. I will look for the shots, but i have some photos of my leafy when it was spua with 2 inch BL and RBZOOK's rig wihen it was zook diffs and standard links, just a 3 inch coil lift and 3 inch bodylift.. We are both parked on a towtruck back with one wheel, and there is not really that much in it. Not enough to consider a huge advantage offroad. Neither car in was much more competent (though im sure Ryan will chime in here ). Both had 31MTR's, i had s1 gears, he had s3 gears. Neither car has any massive modifitations. While eventually coils would allow more flex, the amount of modification required to get there takes it way out of cheap easy people. Look at the work that is in Ryans rig now.muppet_man67 wrote:show us your flexig shots. Coilers wont flex much better then a leaf spring zook without major suspension overhaul.
Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
My leaf sprung Zuk rode much better than a lifted Coily in our club however it was a nicer drive in his due to better build quality on the cab, not as many squeaks and rattles etc.HotAe92 wrote:I am one of those.Gwagensteve wrote:IMHO not really any better than leaf. Thay are newer and there are a whole heap of little changes that made them tighter and quieter, so all up they seem a lot more refined. The steering is a bit better because there is less squish via the shackles etc but all up there's not much in it.
when you add the added complications of the coiler - inadeqate rear roll stiffness, weak bracketry, chain drive transfer poor locker availablility etc, they don't really stack up as a starting point, but I know that others think differently.
Steve.
Firstly ive ridden in a few leaf sprung zooks and then jumped back into mine. Im so glad i bought a coily, ride is SOOOOO much smoother, giving it better touring ability. Another benefit is the flex you can get out of the coils.
As for locker availabilty - They use the same rear diff as SJ70's however the front diff is different.
The biggest problem running 30's or 31's is your Low range crawling abilty. Forget about crawling unless you want to consider buying a set of rockhoppers.
As the others have said much easier to get flex out of a leaf sprung Seirra than a coily.
How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
Ransom note = demand + collage
If u want your lifted coily to drive like a stocker try these.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Suzuki-SJ80-Jimn ... dZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Suzuki-SJ80-Jimn ... dZViewItem
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:05 pm
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:05 pm
Location: in the shed cutting/grinding/welding mocks old shit vic
Im going to do a few flexing shots when i get my front passenger chassis mount re-welded. I dont intend on doing anymore damage until that is fixed. At the moment the rear has a s***load of flex, im really quite pleased with it. But i do think my springs and struts are both really worn, so this could be a contributing factor. The front, like you say, has very little weight, and the car feels unbalanced on SOME angles. I intend on removing the front swaybar when i do some heavy 4x4ing next to see how much more movement i can get out of the front. Only 4 bolts connect the swaybar so its relatively easy to disconnect.muppet_man67 wrote:show us your flexig shots. Coilers wont flex much better then a leaf spring zook without major suspension overhaul
Jayden
'04 NP DiD Pajero: 2" Lift, 33's, ARB Bar, XD9000 Winch, Rear ARB Locker, Snorkel, Dual Batts and Much More...
I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
'04 NP DiD Pajero: 2" Lift, 33's, ARB Bar, XD9000 Winch, Rear ARB Locker, Snorkel, Dual Batts and Much More...
yes the rears do flex very well. Definatly take the swaybar off it will dramaticly improove the offroad balance of the car. on road handling is sacrificed though. You will get little more flex from the front without repositioning the shock mounts. this will also involve fabricating a new bottom spring perch. you may find that the factory control arms get a bit bendy. so these may also have to be replaced with stronger units or strenghthened somehow.HotAe92 wrote:Im going to do a few flexing shots when i get my front passenger chassis mount re-welded. I dont intend on doing anymore damage until that is fixed. At the moment the rear has a s***load of flex, im really quite pleased with it. But i do think my springs and struts are both really worn, so this could be a contributing factor. The front, like you say, has very little weight, and the car feels unbalanced on SOME angles. I intend on removing the front swaybar when i do some heavy 4x4ing next to see how much more movement i can get out of the front. Only 4 bolts connect the swaybar so its relatively easy to disconnect.muppet_man67 wrote:show us your flexig shots. Coilers wont flex much better then a leaf spring zook without major suspension overhaul
Jayden
[url]http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum[/url]
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)
Contact:
HRZOOK might chime in here, he had a set of custom made twister style arms under his coily (prob still does, but planing on lux's i guessing they not staying). THere were some photo's round , but might be gone now. Search on the trasfer swap, if you can do it yourself its going to save a heap of money for ya.
Layto....
Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
Ransom note = demand + collage
its the only way to get a reduction. otherwise you fit a jimny case with reduction gears.grimbo wrote:right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
[url]http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum[/url]
yes I know I was just pointing out that the coily stuff isn't suitable for rockhoppers gears as originally statedmuppet_man67 wrote:its the only way to get a reduction. otherwise you fit a jimny case with reduction gears.grimbo wrote:right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
Ransom note = demand + collage
Grimbo is right Coilies suck ass... burn it and buy a 20 yo leafy........NOTgrimbo wrote:right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
never said that. I was pointing out that:HRZOOK wrote:Grimbo is right Coilies suck ass... burn it and buy a 20 yo leafy........NOTgrimbo wrote:right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
1. Coilys do not necessarily ride better than leaf sprung vehicles
2. That you couldn't just put a set of rockhoppers in and fix the gearing issue as was stated by HotAe92
3. Coilys aren't the best because they are newer or because they are coil sprung. As any vehicle is there are compromises
Ransom note = demand + collage
That is more constructive and informativegrimbo wrote:never said that. I was pointing out that:HRZOOK wrote:Grimbo is right Coilies suck ass... burn it and buy a 20 yo leafy........NOTgrimbo wrote:right so the coily stuff needs to be removed and replaced with stuff from a leaf sprungHotAe92 wrote:I intend on fitting a gear driven case, then the rockhoppers. Russell at O/L in Balcatta assures me that it can be done.grimbo wrote:How do you propose fitting your rockhoppers to a chain driven t/case? To fit rockhoppers you need to fit a t/case form a gear driven (leaf sprung) Sierra
1. Coilys do not necessarily ride better than leaf sprung vehicles
2. That you couldn't just put a set of rockhoppers in and fix the gearing issue as was stated by HotAe92
3. Coilys aren't the best because they are newer or because they are coil sprung. As any vehicle is there are compromises
Coilies can be easily beefed up for a semi core vehicle
1. I disagree
3. I agree
Wow so much energy into bagging something you havent got!
Yes I am a coily owner, and Yes i accept the limitations of said vehicle BUT if i was to buy any other brand swb 4by i would have spent 3 times as much for something that sinks in the 1st bit of mud it sees!!!!
Be constructive,
and alsways remember the wise words of confussions.......
........." reaf sprung sierras are just rike critorus.....evryy crunt got one..."
GO ZOOK
Yes I am a coily owner, and Yes i accept the limitations of said vehicle BUT if i was to buy any other brand swb 4by i would have spent 3 times as much for something that sinks in the 1st bit of mud it sees!!!!
Be constructive,
and alsways remember the wise words of confussions.......
........." reaf sprung sierras are just rike critorus.....evryy crunt got one..."
GO ZOOK
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests