Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Technical RTC dampener Q
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
Technical RTC dampener Q
Hello, I have done a search here on RTC dampeners, in a post it was mentioned that an RTC dampener with the spring removed when compressed and expanded had around a 70/30 split in the physical force needed.
My Q is - does a spring alone (any typical spring) also exhibit this same behaviour? ie more force is needed to either extend it .5 of its length or a .5 compression?
thanks fnq
My Q is - does a spring alone (any typical spring) also exhibit this same behaviour? ie more force is needed to either extend it .5 of its length or a .5 compression?
thanks fnq
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
Re: Technical RTC dampener Q
As a linear first approximation (which is actually quite good under two assumptions [1]) a spring will compress or extend the same distance when subjected to a compressional or extension force of the same magnitude. In Physics, this is referred to as Hooke's law. Hooke's law can be described by the equation F=-kx where F is the force applied, k is the spring constant (in N/m) and x is the change in length of the spring. Notice there is no restriction on the sign of F or x, only that F opposes x (ie. the force is a "restoring" force).fnqcairns wrote:My Q is - does a spring alone (any typical spring) also exhibit this same behaviour? ie more force is needed to either extend it .5 of its length or a .5 compression?
[1] the two assumptions are this: the spring does not exceed its elastic limit (exceeding the limit usually results in a spring which does not naturally return to its original length); and the spring constant remains fairly constant. The latter assumption is generally true in the presence of the former, however fails dramatically if the coils of the spring come into contact. In fact, some "extension" springs have the coils in contact at rest, and thus certainly fail the assumption. Further, "progressive rate" springs are designed to have some of the coils come into contact under compression, deliberately changing the spring rate. Both coils exhibit asymmetric compression/extension behaviour.
* Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool *
Thanks Heath - that sums it up! Now to chase up whether the afore mentioned 70/30 is correct for all the RTC dampners or should I say RTC shockabsorbers which may be the more correct term.
cheers fnq
cheers fnq
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
I second that! Well said, Heath.fnqcairns wrote:Thanks Heath - that sums it up!
From a fundamentals viewpoint, they're dampers - so you were right to begin with.fnqcairns wrote:Now to chase up whether the afore mentioned 70/30 is correct for all the RTC dampners or should I say RTC shockabsorbers which may be the more correct term.
cheers fnq
Cheers,
Scott
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)
Contact:
Basically your springs hold up the car, and react to bumps. The shocks re-act to the movement of the springs, dampening the motion, and the oscillation of the springs. The sdampener basically dampens the feedback of the steering, taking the"shock" out of the reaction to force applied to the wheels or steering wheel.
Layto....
Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
Yeah to me it smacks paying for a steering dampner that behaves more like a shock absorber in dampening design.
I really do not want to consider the RTC but I would like to see if I can cancel out some of the Nissan LHS pull and increase the self centering ability of the steering geomety on this car for driving on the blacktop.
Have half a mind to adapt the spring and carrier to a REAL steering dampner.
Hard to find good products sometimes.
cheers fnq
I really do not want to consider the RTC but I would like to see if I can cancel out some of the Nissan LHS pull and increase the self centering ability of the steering geomety on this car for driving on the blacktop.
Have half a mind to adapt the spring and carrier to a REAL steering dampner.
Hard to find good products sometimes.
cheers fnq
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
Not wanting to get into the technicals too much - my personal experience with the Tough Dog RTC Steering Damper is if you need to replace your existing one - buy the RTC & set it up correctly. I found the vehicle is much more pleasent to drive both on & offroad. If you have massive steering & suspension mods it probably won't make a huge difference though.
It has saved my families lives. Had an idler arm fail on rough country road at about 70kph. The RTC helped to hold the steering centre rather than turning a wheel & rolling the car.
I have no affiliation with this product.
Mick
It has saved my families lives. Had an idler arm fail on rough country road at about 70kph. The RTC helped to hold the steering centre rather than turning a wheel & rolling the car.
I have no affiliation with this product.
Mick
HIS: '90 FJ73 Awaiting funds for mods
OURS: '00 HZ105 Cruiser - HIDs, GPS, UHF, LF240s, BFG MTs, BB, Steps, Outback Drawers . . . .
OURS: '00 HZ105 Cruiser - HIDs, GPS, UHF, LF240s, BFG MTs, BB, Steps, Outback Drawers . . . .
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests