Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

2000 Pajero. Stuffed engine.

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
User avatar
RN
A speed camera would have prevented that!
Posts: 15822
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Check your six.

2000 Pajero. Stuffed engine.

Post by RN »

Neighbour has a 2000 model Pajero 5 door Wagon. Is a high mileage job and it is runs dual fuel.

Mechanic advises that it is suffering valve retention and would last probably another 12 months.

I know that the early V6's suffered from this when running LPG ( my dad's and sister's 3 litre's stuffed up ) but I thought that the 3.5 litre V6 was designed to run on that fuel.

You'd think by 2000 they would have designed an engine that was compatible with that fuel. Nissans are OK, and they too are alloy head, why not Mitsubishi. :?:
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Mitsubishi claim later model engines are LPG compatible.

How does mechanic know this is the problem?

Scott
User avatar
RN
A speed camera would have prevented that!
Posts: 15822
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Check your six.

Post by RN »

No idea Scott, just what the neighbour had been advised by the mechanic.

So is it possible that this condition could still exist in high mileage units or not at all.

How do you check without taking the heads off.
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

My turn to say "no idea." :lol:

Was the term "retention" or "recession" - as in valve seat recession?

I understood the valve problems were from excess heat - LPG burns too hot for the head to cope with it. So I suppose overheating the engine could induce a similar effect?

I don't know how you'd diagnose this without removing the heads, which is why I was curious about how the mechanic knew. I hope he's not jumping to conclusions such as "Mitsubishi V6 + LPG = Valve problems."

Not saying mechanic is wrong - just that these motors are supposed to cope with LPG.

Cheers,

Scott
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: packahoonaham

Post by corkhead »

My 2002 NM Pajero has a section in the factory handbook stating it is compatible for LPG, im sure it is the same with the 2000 ......
www.victoriancampertrailers.com.au
www.salon13.com.au
User avatar
RN
A speed camera would have prevented that!
Posts: 15822
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Check your six.

Post by RN »

Scott,

recession sounds better. Thought about it overnight and believe that a mechanic could probably diagnose if the valves were receding into the head due to the valve clearance.

Not sure if they gets tighter or more rattlely? Motor is not running correctly ( like a dog was the expression I had heard)

I know the heads should come off for a proper diagnosis . Are Paj's known for burning their valves out with LPG ?
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

RoadNazi wrote:Scott,

recession sounds better. Thought about it overnight and believe that a mechanic could probably diagnose if the valves were receding into the head due to the valve clearance.
Perhaps it's the recession he had to have? :lol:

You have a good point - if they recede too far the lifters will run out of "adjustment."
RoadNazi wrote:Not sure if they gets tighter or more rattlely? Motor is not running correctly ( like a dog was the expression I had heard)

I know the heads should come off for a proper diagnosis . Are Paj's known for burning their valves out with LPG ?
The 12V 3.0 have a bad reputation with gas, although some have got away with it and will tell you they are fine. I'm not sure about the 3.5 DOHC motor (released mid '90s) but the 3.5 SOHC (and 24V 3.0) is classified as LPG compatible, and I'm not aware of valve problems.

Hopefully, somebody who knows will post up.

Cheers,

Scott
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests