Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Huge lift just engineered in NSW

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Forum rules
Post Reply
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Huge lift just engineered in NSW

Post by sudso »

Anyone seen the swb cruiser for sale on e-bay?

I keep hearing of engineers knocking back mods but then there's this thing:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Toyota-Landcruis ... dZViewItem
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Top
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

What do people think of this thing? Not the work put into it, just the way it looks?

To quote an infamous red-head, I don't like it. Just looks wrong - too much lift / tyres too small / arches the wrong shape.

Anybody like it?

Scott
Top
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Post by sudso »

I mean "that thing" gets an RWC etc. and lots of lesser mods are getting knocked back?

I think it looks sort of ok but like some promo trucks, yeah, wankmobile :roll:
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Top
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Contact:
Contact evanstaniland

Post by evanstaniland »

Bling Bling show pony = farking stupid!!!
why build up a big 4wd for a show pony why not hot up a commadore or sum other 2wd car its just adding to the amount of difficulty you have to go through to get anything engineered!!

evan...
Top
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

Thats alot for a 40, even with the amount of work that they say has gone into it. I think it just looks really high cause it doesn't have huge rubber... 33"s/31"s on atm??
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Top
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

-Scott- wrote:What do people think of this thing? Not the work put into it, just the way it looks?

To quote an infamous red-head, I don't like it. Just looks wrong - too much lift / tyres too small / arches the wrong shape.
Scott
x2

THIRTY THOUSAND AUSSIE $ FOR A 40 SERIES??? he does mean 40x40 series doesnt he?
Top
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Contact:
Contact Slunnie

Post by Slunnie »

I think the build looks great and all credit to them, but the car itself is a bit funny. The lift looks too high for the rubber, the axle too far forward and what in the hell were they thinking when they put AT's on it. I like the Chev though.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Top
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Post by sudso »

RockyF70 wrote:Thats alot for a 40, even with the amount of work that they say has gone into it. I think it just looks really high cause it doesn't have huge rubber... 33"s/31"s on atm??
" the BIG Bridgestone AT's" the ad says! :rofl:
Biggest AT Bridgestone make is a 33
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Top
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

it looks pretty gh.ey to me
1989 Nissan Safari TD42 with stuff
Top
User avatar
Vulcanised
Temporary Australian
Posts: 6728
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 7:45 am
Location: somewhere........ who knows where

Post by Vulcanised »

28 grand is far too much........ i don't care who built it or what's in it.... any car will never make back what it's worth. Saw one similar up here with a 351 in it and running on 35's, looked every bit as high and from reports was very well done... it sold for less than half what they are asking.
There is no "I" in Team, but there are 5 in Individual Brilliance
Top
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:52 pm
Location: BrisVegas

Post by gu4800 »

-Scott- wrote:too much lift / tyres too small / arches the wrong shape.
Scott
You pretty much summed up my thoughts.
____________________
Dan

[quote="v840"]I bet you're the kind of person, when you're railing someone in the ass
you don't even have the common courtesy to give them a reach around! [/quote]
Top
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by 65Mog »

I'd say thats the biggest tyre that they could get engineered, maybe they are being responsible and are selling it fully road legal :) .
Top
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:46 am
Location: Geraldton West Oz

Post by Hoppy11 »

It seems to be a bit lower in the ass and the front tyres look too far forward
Hoppy
Top
Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Not where you are

Contact:
Contact Gribble

Post by Gribble »

I dont like it. Too "wank factor".
\m/
Top
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Shadow »

the front looks like itsbuilt to take a 38" tyre, while the back you might get away with a 35 but definantly no bigger without some guard chopping

so why bother moving the front diff so far forward etc when theres no way you can fit big tyresd in anyway cause of the back end???
Top
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

its fugly... its a 40 series.... its not gonna sell at that price, and if it does i will cry.
Top
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

sudso wrote:
RockyF70 wrote:Thats alot for a 40, even with the amount of work that they say has gone into it. I think it just looks really high cause it doesn't have huge rubber... 33"s/31"s on atm??
" the BIG Bridgestone AT's" the ad says! :rofl:
Biggest AT Bridgestone make is a 33
They are BFG's!!!!! THey dont even know what they are tryin to rip people off with!
and you can get them in 35's too!
Last edited by bogged on Thu May 25, 2006 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:05 pm
Location: Kilsyth, Victoria

Post by hokey »

It looks like they have moved the diff forwards heaps. would fit some massive tyres under there tho :D

Something is only worth what someone will pay and i don't think people looking for a serious 40 series for a 4wd won't buy it but some rich kid looking for a weekend beach car or some BS like that might pay that :?
Top
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

I like DRS' better :armsup: haha

The front looks weird.. and as said, the back wont take a much bigger tyre anyways.. Yeh, from pics they look like BFG A/T.. not bridgeys.. mite have changed them after the pics were taken.
[quote="RockyF70 - Coming out of the closet"]i'd be rushing out and buying an IFS rocky[/quote]
Top
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, QLD

Post by Dee »

is it just me or are they some whack front shock angles???

(obviously to stop rubbing at the front but... wtf?)
All the gear, No idea...
Top
Posts: 535
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:57 am
Location: Oakleigh, Victoria

Post by of4x4 »

As per other topics, how could this possibly be engineered? Doesn't it have to have mud flaps on the driven wheels that are no more than 300mm from the ground??
Top
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: ACT

Post by CanberraMav »

Look at the picture with the car side on with the chick in it.

The shocks at the front are on a 45 degree angle because the axle is so far forward :D

I guess they couldnt move the top mount forward for some reason
Mud_runner_GQ says:
I need 1.6 metre long shocks
Top
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Contact:
Contact Beastmavster

Post by Beastmavster »

Hey hey hey.... it's gh3y
Top
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: stuck between the clowns & the jokers!

Post by MR04WD »

It also says....'BEST WE'VE EVER SEEN'........oh hang on one minute & let me think before I retort.......yep,just a sec.......


.......BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lol: :rofl: inhale.....BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lol: ......ooh,I need a lie down!
OVERKILL ENGINEERING
www.overkill4x4.com
(02) 94766137
Top
Posts: 5060
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 7:28 pm
Location: Narellan Vale, Sydney

Post by Screwy »

yep.... end of the day.... its a 40 series.... no way in hell its worth 29K...

not gunna happen.... can build something the same, that just doesnt look as bling for about 5 K...

i reckon he would struggle to get 15 for that at best i reckon he would struggle for 10K unless to the right bloke... and its only a cruise mobile, not offroad :? wats the point :?: :roll:
TUFF TRUCK TEAM OPPOSITE LOCK Proudly Sponsored By:

Opposite Lock Narellan, Lightforce Australia, Offroad Systems, Judd Panels, Townsend Signs, RDG Engineering, Central Safety Workwear
Top
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Cossie »

Like all 40's - fugly.


I'd pork the chick though :armsup:
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
Top
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

CanberraMav wrote:Look at the picture with the car side on with the chick in it.

The shocks at the front are on a 45 degree angle because the axle is so far forward :D

I guess they couldnt move the top mount forward for some reason
shock setup looks better then most as they are mounted at nearly the same angle the diff will move on compression
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Top
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

redzook wrote:
CanberraMav wrote:Look at the picture with the car side on with the chick in it.

The shocks at the front are on a 45 degree angle because the axle is so far forward :D

I guess they couldnt move the top mount forward for some reason
shock setup looks better then most as they are mounted at nearly the same angle the diff will move on compression
Exactly - thats how mine was ;) It is easier on the shock as it follows the spring through its travel. Particularly on the shackle reversed suspension

Image <------- Click for larger pic ;)
Last edited by Shorty40 on Thu May 25, 2006 8:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

Thats just an oxford st pimp mobile, the build quality looks good but its still an over priced wank mobile !
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Top
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

I like it. It looks like it has some good build quality. It is obviously sitting on smaller tyres than it is setup for engineering purposes. I don't see why it couldn't be engineeered and Road worthy. Just because it is big doesn't mean thhey havven't done the right thing and built this with an engineer from the start. Price wise I agree a bit high but it will come down in price when they don't sell
Ransom note = demand + collage
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Tech”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests