Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

3.3i pathfinder

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:32 pm
Location: morayfield

3.3i pathfinder

Post by procompman »

just wondering if anyone has a v6 pathfinder or has had one what was it like and what was the fuel usage out of it as i am thinking about getting one for the g/f :roll:
91 XLT MAV 4.2P 2IN SUS 2IN BODY PROCOMP X TERRAINS

GU Patrol ST 3.0 Auto with mods to come
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: 3.3i pathfinder

Post by bogged »

procompman wrote:just wondering if anyone has a v6 pathfinder or has had one what was it like and what was the fuel usage out of it as i am thinking about getting one for the g/f :roll:
We have a 2001 model Pathy, thirsty as hell and underpowered. :( They almost feel restricted like they are being held back, which I think could be fixed with some effort...

They are an underestimated 4b, there were a few in our club did Simpson trips, cape york trips and more without any failures towin trailers..

Your best bet is to go drive one.
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:52 am

Post by Cheesemaker »

I have a 2002 ST. We got about 580km per tank with AT tyres, works out to be around 12.34lts per 100km.
When we changed to running MT tyres we get about 500km per tank.
I know few Sydney blokes get around 15-17lts per 100km in their R50 Pathies.

Great 4wd for the missus
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Cheesemaker wrote:I have a 2002 ST. We got about 580km per tank with AT tyres, works out to be around 12.34lts per 100km
you must drive very economically ...
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:32 pm
Location: morayfield

Post by procompman »

ok thanks bogged and cheesemaker thats still better than 23L/100km that i am getting out of the patrol have to take a few for a test drive
91 XLT MAV 4.2P 2IN SUS 2IN BODY PROCOMP X TERRAINS

GU Patrol ST 3.0 Auto with mods to come
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests