Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Zuk windscreen frames
Zuk windscreen frames
G'day everyone
I need to change the windscreen on my zuk due to a rollover. Is this an easy job i can just bolt another on or is there more involved. I have a non-foldable windscreen at the moment, is the foldable windscreen easier to install or is it the same installation as the solid windscreen?
Cheers, Stubbs
I need to change the windscreen on my zuk due to a rollover. Is this an easy job i can just bolt another on or is there more involved. I have a non-foldable windscreen at the moment, is the foldable windscreen easier to install or is it the same installation as the solid windscreen?
Cheers, Stubbs
Last edited by Stubbs on Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Drive Hard,Think Later
Foldable windscreen is easier, plus if you have never roped in a windscreen (the glass) you can take the frame to the pros. I had my new one cut out of the stuff they make truck windscreens out of, rather then the original Zuk screen. They are very expensive.
Edit: Wait...what model zuk are you working on?
Edit: Wait...what model zuk are you working on?
It is a genuine sierra ute, not stockman if that makes any difference, but it is still only one piece for the windscreen surround and the small section above the bonnet, at a quick glance it doesnt look like an "unbolt, bolt new one on" job and will take a bit more, just wanting some advice on how to go about this job
Cheers, Stubbs
Cheers, Stubbs
Drive Hard,Think Later
Stubbs wrote:It is a genuine sierra ute, not stockman if that makes any difference, but it is still only one piece for the windscreen surround and the small section above the bonnet, at a quick glance it doesnt look like an "unbolt, bolt new one on" job and will take a bit more, just wanting some advice on how to go about this job
Cheers, Stubbs
Pics on how bad it its...might be better off to get a new cab

[quote="dazza30875"]whats "FAIL" mean[/quote]
[quote="fool_injected"]
Sometimes your funny Canada :D[/quote]
[quote="fool_injected"]
Sometimes your funny Canada :D[/quote]
is the roof bent or creased?? If so, throw the cab out.
Otherwise, it is a hard job replacing the surround in a hard top or tin top cab. It is spot welded in and seam sealed all the way around. to do the job properly will require more than backyard tools. ( I'm not calling you a bodgy backyarder, just saying that there is alot involved)
Hope you can get another cab if needed.
Pete
Otherwise, it is a hard job replacing the surround in a hard top or tin top cab. It is spot welded in and seam sealed all the way around. to do the job properly will require more than backyard tools. ( I'm not calling you a bodgy backyarder, just saying that there is alot involved)
Hope you can get another cab if needed.
Pete
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
Alrite, so from the sounds of it, I will need a new cab for her.
Here are a couple of pics
http://s73.photobucket.com/albums/i213/ ... 6_1533.jpg
http://s73.photobucket.com/albums/i213/ ... t=roll.jpg
Cheers, Stubbs
Here are a couple of pics
http://s73.photobucket.com/albums/i213/ ... 6_1533.jpg
http://s73.photobucket.com/albums/i213/ ... t=roll.jpg
Cheers, Stubbs
Drive Hard,Think Later
Sad as it sounds, yep, it's a gonner. If you can find a new cab, swap one in, but that's not getting repaired. I have seen them totalled with much less damage.
If it was a soft top, you could swap in a new windscreen frame, B pillar and doors and be off again.
Steve.
If it was a soft top, you could swap in a new windscreen frame, B pillar and doors and be off again.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
look alot like narrow track flairs?Stubbs wrote:Thanks people, I guess all I need to do now is find a good cab for a replacement.
Yep, definately thinking an exo in the future.I see a new cab and an exo in your future![]()
Oh & btw that's not a WT![]()
And btw, it is a WTits one of few stock LWB WT utes
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
It looks that way, but I have double checked it by comparing the width to other WT's and it is the same, I think the flares may have been replaced at some stage before I bought it as the flares are a rough cut and don't look like a job done from the zuk factory.redzook wrote wrote:look alot like narrow track flairs?Stubbs wrote wrote:Thanks people, I guess all I need to do now is find a good cab for a replacement.
damo wrote wrote:I see a new cab and an exo in your future![]()
Oh & btw that's not a WT![]()
Yep, definately thinking an exo in the future.
And btw, it is a WTits one of few stock LWB WT utes
Drive Hard,Think Later
Ah, one of those really rare widetrack utes with a narrow track dash, narrow track grille, no flares, and narrow track indicator repeaters. Oh, it must have NT diffs on the widetrack chassis too, because otherwise the tyres would be well out past the rubber flares.
Oh, and it must be a prototype too, because WT's came out in '88.
It does have WT door mirrors though, I can see the source of the confusion.
Sorry, you did have three chances to pull out of the WT thing.
Grimbo's car is an 87 LWB cab chassis, and it was NT, and ran 16" rims, which is why there are no flares at all on your car - not even litle tiny NT ones.
Steve.
Oh, and it must be a prototype too, because WT's came out in '88.
It does have WT door mirrors though, I can see the source of the confusion.
Sorry, you did have three chances to pull out of the WT thing.
Grimbo's car is an 87 LWB cab chassis, and it was NT, and ran 16" rims, which is why there are no flares at all on your car - not even litle tiny NT ones.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Thanks again to everyone with constructive advice about the windscreen surround.
Everyone else is entitled to their own opinion, so I don't really care about if you think my car is NT or WT, your view is only based on 2 pics which don't show a whole lot, but thanks anyway.
Stubbs
Everyone else is entitled to their own opinion, so I don't really care about if you think my car is NT or WT, your view is only based on 2 pics which don't show a whole lot, but thanks anyway.
Stubbs
Drive Hard,Think Later
In any case, any cab chassis cab will fit. if you find a 1.0 litre cab, it will fit too, but will be a bit more work. Ideally you would want to cut the firewall out of the 1.0 cab in the area of the brake booster to get the boosted brakes you have now.
There are more 1.0 cab chassis around than 1.3.
This advice holds true of the chassis is NT or WT. The body mountings are the same.
Take a photo of the fixed end spring hanger between the rear tyre and the back of the cab. This will clear it up as this area of the chassis on WT LWB's is very unusual and distinctive. It will also clarify if it was a WT LWB tub car that has been fitted with a NT cab because the tray mounts will not be there.
Is the fuel tank behind or ahead of the front axle?
There are lots of different part numbers WT to NT - bearings, driveshafts, gearbox, engine. If you are doing more work on it, it will become critical sooner or later.
If it is as rare as it would be if it was an 87 Wt Cab chassis, the VIN won't help at a parts counter.
Steve.
There are more 1.0 cab chassis around than 1.3.
This advice holds true of the chassis is NT or WT. The body mountings are the same.
Take a photo of the fixed end spring hanger between the rear tyre and the back of the cab. This will clear it up as this area of the chassis on WT LWB's is very unusual and distinctive. It will also clarify if it was a WT LWB tub car that has been fitted with a NT cab because the tray mounts will not be there.
Is the fuel tank behind or ahead of the front axle?
There are lots of different part numbers WT to NT - bearings, driveshafts, gearbox, engine. If you are doing more work on it, it will become critical sooner or later.
If it is as rare as it would be if it was an 87 Wt Cab chassis, the VIN won't help at a parts counter.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests