Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

2f timing please help

Tech Talk for Cruiser owners.

Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX

Post Reply
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:20 pm
Location: A.C.T

2f timing please help

Post by crazy60 »

does any body know where the timing should be set ie advanced or retarded
any help would be great as it's running like shit and missing.the plugs and points are fine but its still missing and spluttering.


thanks
GQ LWB ,4" lift ,lsd rear, 33"BFG MUDDIESl
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

is it on lpg? this'll change the optimal settings too
Spit my last breath
Posts: 780
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:11 pm
Location: darwin again

Post by simkell »

if it has only started to play up and you hadn't adjusted the timing, then the timing isn't the problem. anyhow try about 12 degrees advance. have you checked your leads and fuel system?
Resident Terrorist
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Driving Barnsey's mum to bingo

Post by RAY185 »

Timing on a 2F should be 7 degrees B.T.D.C. at idle.
What gap have you set the points to?
I'm assuming the condensor is ok?
Also a good idea to do a compression test.
Mine developed a miss, compression test revealed almost no compression in 3 and 4 due to blown head gasket between the 2 cylinders.
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:20 pm
Location: A.C.T

timing

Post by crazy60 »

yeah thanks had a blown head gasket because timing was so far out for way to long
GQ LWB ,4" lift ,lsd rear, 33"BFG MUDDIESl
Resident Terrorist
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Driving Barnsey's mum to bingo

Post by RAY185 »

If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

RAY185 wrote:If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
Spit my last breath
Resident Terrorist
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Driving Barnsey's mum to bingo

Post by RAY185 »

bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
You mean you have run unleaded in it for 200,000Km without upper cyl lubricant?
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:20 pm
Location: A.C.T

valves

Post by crazy60 »

nah all good had that done when engine was rebuilt
GQ LWB ,4" lift ,lsd rear, 33"BFG MUDDIESl
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
You mean you have run unleaded in it for 200,000Km without upper cyl lubricant?
and i know of plenty of others that have done the same...
Spit my last breath
Resident Terrorist
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Driving Barnsey's mum to bingo

Post by RAY185 »

bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
You mean you have run unleaded in it for 200,000Km without upper cyl lubricant?
and i know of plenty of others that have done the same...
So you and the others were putting ULP in even while LRP was still available? Assuming because it was cheaper? Well I guess you can just keep doing what you're doing and when the exhast valves burn out then bite the bullet and do it then, or it could be an excuse to do an engine upgrade. I only did mine becuase the head was off getting crack tested and machined.
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:If you are planning on getting your head reconditioned while its off then its a good oportunity to get the hardened valves put in while they are at it so you can run unleaded with out having to add upper cylinder lubricant. I did it to mine, it costs a bit extra but well worth it.

Good luck.
Ray
i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
You mean you have run unleaded in it for 200,000Km without upper cyl lubricant?
and i know of plenty of others that have done the same...
So you and the others were putting ULP in even while LRP was still available? Assuming because it was cheaper? Well I guess you can just keep doing what you're doing and when the exhast valves burn out then bite the bullet and do it then, or it could be an excuse to do an engine upgrade. I only did mine becuase the head was off getting crack tested and machined.
read the yankee sites. they haven't had lead in petrol since the 70's, yet there 2f's are still going strong. they have none of these "fears" of valve seat recession, exaust valves burning out etc.

on a 400 000k+ 2f, there are things more likely to go. ;)
Spit my last breath
Resident Terrorist
Posts: 4278
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Driving Barnsey's mum to bingo

Post by RAY185 »

bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote:
RAY185 wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: i haven't done it to mine, but it's had a good 200 000 k's on it (in my hands) without issues...
You mean you have run unleaded in it for 200,000Km without upper cyl lubricant?
and i know of plenty of others that have done the same...
So you and the others were putting ULP in even while LRP was still available? Assuming because it was cheaper? Well I guess you can just keep doing what you're doing and when the exhast valves burn out then bite the bullet and do it then, or it could be an excuse to do an engine upgrade. I only did mine becuase the head was off getting crack tested and machined.
read the yankee sites. they haven't had lead in petrol since the 70's, yet there 2f's are still going strong. they have none of these "fears" of valve seat recession, exaust valves burning out etc.

on a 400 000k+ 2f, there are things more likely to go. ;)
Interesting......I thought Leaded fuel was banned mid 90s in the US. They were still manufacturing cars after the 70s that were intended to run on leaded, why would this happen if there was no leaded fuel available? But it is interesting that Australia has such a big "Valve Saver Additive" industry based on the theory of VSR while in the US (as you say) its no biggie. Is it all just hype?

With the phasing out of LRP in Australia, The Australian Institute of Petrol (AIP) composed a list of vehicles that were ok to run on ULP. It was put together after consulting with the vehicles manufacturer. Basically if your car isnt on the list then the manufacturer of your engine deemed that it requires an anti-valve seat recession agent. Interestingly enough according to the list FJ40's with 2F engines built after 79 (or 77 if sold in NSW, god knows why) are ok un ULP so I'd say its safe to assume that, according to Toyota, pre 79 (or 77?) 2F engines are not. Mine is a 75, whats yours?

After all this I do agree that on a 400 000k+ 2f VSR would not be an immediate maintenance issue. :D
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests