Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
ARB's Air Locker or TJM's Pro-Locker??
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
Think its kim bolten that ruffs talkin about. And he is right . only 1 thats outright sponsered by the company not the franchises. I used to run arbs and now in the buggy prolocka. (mcnamarra) Why should one company have a manopoly on the air locka market. I give mine a hard time and have had no probs what so ever. With the arbs i had problems with the crapy little blue airline so in the buggy i am running a 300 psi hose with high pressure hydrolic fittings and have had no probs at all.
Twenty4-7 Rock Racing
#247
http://www.mickeythompsontires.com.au/index.htm
#247
http://www.mickeythompsontires.com.au/index.htm
WOuld be interested to know whos changing over. Cos really I cant see anyone of the competirors that I know of changing over unless they are getting sponsered or they bust an ARB and are are willing to trythem. Cos most comp guys I know of aint that well off. So why sell there arb's for bugger all, just to go buy a Prolocker.derek06 wrote:so then if the prolockers aren't better then the arb locker so why is it then that a lot of the guys that race in the winch challenges and the outback challenge and so on are switching from arb lockers to the prolockers I would say that that is telling you something about which locker is better. I don't think that the lockers can be tested any better then in those events. and for the people waiting for the prolocker be patient they are coming
If I was to buy new now I would probably look at them.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Laurie drives a Hilux but i think your thinking of Kim Bolton who drives a GU.ISUZUROVER wrote:Are you talking about Laurie Sternbeck (sp?) and his GQ? He is sponsored by TJM isn't he?RUFF wrote:As far as i know there is only one vehicle competing in Australia that is outright sponsored by Pro Locker. Other than that TJM(the company not a franchise) Dont sponsor many vehicles at all.antt wrote:cause they're sponsored....?
But I suppose that is a reason to buy ARB - the fact that they seem to sponsor a lot of events and competitors.
so there are others that are sponsored by local tjm places then. also, arent you part of 'Team TJM' Tony?RUFF wrote:As far as i know there is only one vehicle competing in Australia that is outright sponsored by Pro Locker. Other than that TJM(the company not a franchise) Dont sponsor many vehicles at all.antt wrote:cause they're sponsored....?
not bashin, just highlightin the fact that people have to take some peoples opinions with a grain of salt, cause they may be pushin their sponsors product
i'd run a prolocker in my pos, if i was deciding between a new arb or new prolocker, just to try something different. but i have a line on a second hand arb, so will most likely go that way
Actually no im not part of Team TJM but yes i run an event that is sponsored by TJM. There is no denying that. My buggy runs ARBs and i have been using these for around 8 years with only one seal problem in that time but that was an install error on my behalf.antt wrote:so there are others that are sponsored by local tjm places then. also, arent you part of 'Team TJM' Tony?
If i was buying NEW lockers now i would go with the Pro Locker not because i have a relationship with TJM but because they dont have the seal issue. Is one stronger than the other? I couldnt say. I have had both apart and both have good and bad parts in their design.
Hay RUFF
Which one had the more GOOD then BAD parts in their design??
Which one had the more GOOD then BAD parts in their design??
Last edited by Patrolguy on Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
GU Patrol 3.0TDi wagon, 3" RANCHO lift,
285/75R16 STT's, 3" exhaust, Rock Sliders,
ARB Air lockers, C/barrier, B/bar,
S/Oscar's, UHF/SATNAV & a Baby Seat
285/75R16 STT's, 3" exhaust, Rock Sliders,
ARB Air lockers, C/barrier, B/bar,
S/Oscar's, UHF/SATNAV & a Baby Seat
Pro locker uses rubber U rings instead of ARB's O rings. The U rings are cheaper and less wear/heat resistant than the O rings.GRINCH wrote:if the prolocker has no o rings what do they use instead?
I hope they've changed a few things since the pro locker was released too:
The Pro locker can not be engaged at speeds over 30kph.
Pro locker uses the same solenoids that ARB used to use. ARB now uses a superior type solenoid.
No bearing puller slots on the pro locker. Lets just hope you enjoy the complete disassembly of the carrier and locking mechanism so you can punch the bearing off from the inside.
Pro locker has no wiring diagram or harness. Maybe not a problem to some people but the number of questions I read on here about locker/compressor wiring, switching and plumbing, I guess not everyone is au fait with that side of things.
You will also find that TJM's advertising has been very misleading with their comparisons, I'm sure if you study their comparison carefully you'll pick most of them up.
So now lets hear some technical reasons why the TJM is better please?
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
http://www.tjm.com.au/Default.aspx?tabid=93
has a some one detailed break down/3d image of the inside of the pro-locker
may be helpful
has a some one detailed break down/3d image of the inside of the pro-locker
may be helpful
Dont worrys There's No Sugar
My 4x4 Is too clean.... Needs a Mud Pack
My 4x4 Is too clean.... Needs a Mud Pack
sniper wrote:pro locker is the way to go.
ARB are good but the seals will eventually fuk up.
TJM bought the pro locker from mcnamara.
I will be puttimg pro lockers into my cruiser when $$$ permits.
The seals will fuk up how exactly? which seals are you even talking about?
o rings only fail due to incorrect fitment, not through wear and tear.
see Ruffs reply above:
Has anyone here actually had an o ring fail due to wear?RUFF wrote:My buggy runs ARBs and i have been using these for around 8 years with only one seal problem in that time but that was an install error on my behalf.
Just add a little more tech to this discussion :
the Pro locker uses a one piece cross shaft, ARB uses seperate cross shafts. The grade of alloy steel used by ARB is not even available in the form used by the pro locker.
Over 750 views and 45 replies and I am yet to see one piece of TECH (not opinion) proving the pro locker over the ARB
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
1 question for this post, and one comment on a notion that was semi kicked around before...Cossie wrote:Pro locker uses rubber U rings instead of ARB's O rings. The U rings are cheaper and less wear/heat resistant than the O rings.GRINCH wrote:if the prolocker has no o rings what do they use instead?
I hope they've changed a few things since the pro locker was released too:
The Pro locker can not be engaged at speeds over 30kph.
Pro locker uses the same solenoids that ARB used to use. ARB now uses a superior type solenoid.
No bearing puller slots on the pro locker. Lets just hope you enjoy the complete disassembly of the carrier and locking mechanism so you can punch the bearing off from the inside.
Pro locker has no wiring diagram or harness. Maybe not a problem to some people but the number of questions I read on here about locker/compressor wiring, switching and plumbing, I guess not everyone is au fait with that side of things.
You will also find that TJM's advertising has been very misleading with their comparisons, I'm sure if you study their comparison carefully you'll pick most of them up.
So now lets hear some technical reasons why the TJM is better please?
question...why preytel would it be necessary to engage a locker at over 30kph??? ive never understood this logic.......
and a comment on the mass produced / quality control issue raised beofre....anyone who is into knives (folders/fighters/combat etc etc) will know alot of the 'big' name companies produce most of their knives out of taiwan for mass production because it is cheaper, but they spend quite a bit on quality control because it is in the companies best interest...why would a reputable company produce an air locker to compete with cheap chinese knock offs...its just doesnt make sense...they mass produce and or produce in taiwan china etc to save cost, and spend some of the savings on increased QC to keep their reputation...all about economy
I thought Laurie Sternbeck had a hilux??ISUZUROVER wrote:Thanks, that's who I meant - all Nissan drivers look the same to me...not not wrote:Think its kim bolten
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Well Well....
From my experience..............
I have an original ARB airlocker based on the Jacmac's locker (so i've been told) in my 60. It's the first ones they built that you can't get parts for anymore. By comparing it to a current ARB from the same application you can see that the current ARB has a far superior design. but so it should have.
I don't think that the item being mass produced is a fair reason to either praise or can the item. Likewise the fact that it is "identical" or "similar to" a Jacmac's is no reason to make an asumption on it's quality being one way or the other.
Hyundia built there first Excels on a copy of the worst model mitsubishui ever built, The Colt, and the Excel was even worse. On the other hand Nissan built the RB30 on a copy of a european EFI 6cyl and it was ten times better..
Just cause it "looks" the same means nothing. Time will tell wether the Prolocka is up to the task. But for now we should all give it a fair go and base our decision to purchase a prolocka on the ideas of our rights as a consumer to purchase. I think price and service is the best things to look at and unless the product proves itself inferior why can we not believe that it is an equal product to others on the market!... If you want one then buy one!
There is always going to be what i call "the holden v's ford" debate.
Just so you all know.. I have two ARB's because prolocka wasn't available when i purchased. And i am in no way affiliated or otherwise with either product, i just believe we shoulsd base our decisions and comments on FACTS, and i failed to fine too many of them in this thread!...
Cheers,
.... Steps off his soap box..
From my experience..............
I have an original ARB airlocker based on the Jacmac's locker (so i've been told) in my 60. It's the first ones they built that you can't get parts for anymore. By comparing it to a current ARB from the same application you can see that the current ARB has a far superior design. but so it should have.
I don't think that the item being mass produced is a fair reason to either praise or can the item. Likewise the fact that it is "identical" or "similar to" a Jacmac's is no reason to make an asumption on it's quality being one way or the other.
Hyundia built there first Excels on a copy of the worst model mitsubishui ever built, The Colt, and the Excel was even worse. On the other hand Nissan built the RB30 on a copy of a european EFI 6cyl and it was ten times better..
Just cause it "looks" the same means nothing. Time will tell wether the Prolocka is up to the task. But for now we should all give it a fair go and base our decision to purchase a prolocka on the ideas of our rights as a consumer to purchase. I think price and service is the best things to look at and unless the product proves itself inferior why can we not believe that it is an equal product to others on the market!... If you want one then buy one!
There is always going to be what i call "the holden v's ford" debate.
Just so you all know.. I have two ARB's because prolocka wasn't available when i purchased. And i am in no way affiliated or otherwise with either product, i just believe we shoulsd base our decisions and comments on FACTS, and i failed to fine too many of them in this thread!...
Cheers,
.... Steps off his soap box..
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Yeah Mc roberts sounds right. That's what i have in the butt. and ARB jobbie in the schnozz.cloughy wrote:The first air lockers werent made by ARB, the y were made by a bloke think it was Mcroberts or something similar and the patent was bought by ARB
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
The Blokes name was Robert something, hence air locker part numbers starting with RD (his surname starts with D)Ruffy wrote:Yeah Mc roberts sounds right. That's what i have in the butt. and ARB jobbie in the schnozz.cloughy wrote:The first air lockers werent made by ARB, the y were made by a bloke think it was Mcroberts or something similar and the patent was bought by ARB
If I delete my posts can this thread be moved to general chit chat as clearly no-one has anything more techy to say about the pro locker other than its based on a macnamara so it must be ok?
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
My 2c: Go the ARB's! Just from experience had them for years with no trouble's and they have only improved them since my old one's were manufactured. The o-rings are not a problem - one of those things where a few people install them bad, have a winge and rumours spread. If you're not a cafeful, meticulous type of home mechanic (or professional mechanic at that) then get it installed by the pro's. Once it's in properly it just keeps working time and time again.
I'll take a product that has sold 1000's with a couple of explainable problems than a less proven product that has zero performance benefits and zero cost benefits.
I'll take a product that has sold 1000's with a couple of explainable problems than a less proven product that has zero performance benefits and zero cost benefits.
that may well be the case, but isn't the selctor on a Jack Mc external to the diff, (as is a Maxi), and if so, replacement is a lot easier than pulling the diff appart to replace an 'O' ring if it may fail. Granted, the vast majority will never have a problem.Cossie wrote:Pro locker uses rubber U rings instead of ARB's O rings. The U rings are cheaper and less wear/heat resistant than the O rings.GRINCH wrote:if the prolocker has no o rings what do they use instead?
from Jack Mc's siteI hope they've changed a few things since the pro locker was released too:
The Pro locker can not be engaged at speeds over 30kph.
The Diff Lock should preferably be operated while the vehicle is in motion. Road Speed is of no concern while operating the Diff Lock, so long as straight line driving is taking place - because the Carrier Locking Ring and Axle Gears are all rotating at the same synchronised speed to one another.
Pro locker uses the same solenoids that ARB used to use. ARB now uses a superior type solenoid.
No bearing puller slots on the pro locker. Lets just hope you enjoy the complete disassembly of the carrier and locking mechanism so you can punch the bearing off from the inside.
Pro locker has no wiring diagram or harness. Maybe not a problem to some people but the number of questions I read on here about locker/compressor wiring, switching and plumbing, I guess not everyone is au fait with that side of things.
You will also find that TJM's advertising has been very misleading with their comparisons, I'm sure if you study their comparison carefully you'll pick most of them up.
So now lets hear some technical reasons why the TJM is better please?
OK, what material do both manufacturers use ?the Pro locker uses a one piece cross shaft, ARB uses seperate cross shafts. The grade of alloy steel used by ARB is not even available in the form used by the pro locker.
Jack Mc piccy
ARB piccy
I have no bias either way, just interested in some more facts.
http://www.mcnamaradiffs.com.au/home.html
http://www.arb.com.au/air_locker_lockin ... ntials.htm
300Tdi Defender 130 CC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests