Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

D1 - moving front axle forward?

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

D1 - moving front axle forward?

Post by TuffRR »

Have just upsized the tyres on my Discovery from 235/85's to 265/75's.

Despite all i have read about this size fitting with my setup, I still have some major rubbing in certain places which I will need to resolve (with a dremel

:twisted: )

The front is a little more problematic. The drivers side wheel on even moderate compression rubs on the back of the wheel arch near the bottom of the door. There is plenty of room forward however as it is no where near touching my bullbar. I'd rather not chop this panel coz it would look pretty bodge IMO.

Is it feasible to use some spacer washers on both my radius arms to push them forward a bit (say 30mm max)? I'm thinking it may also have an effect on my steering geometry?
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: D1 - moving front axle forward?

Post by landy_man »

TuffRR wrote:I'm thinking it may also have an effect on my steering geometry?
yep...
and your coils wont be vertical anymore ..

just BL the bitch :lol:
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

25-30mm bl should almost do it.
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Re: D1 - moving front axle forward?

Post by TuffRR »

landy_man wrote: just BL the bitch :lol:
Tourer. Not going to happen.

Any one with some sensible suggestions? :roll:

:finger:
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

One problem you will have is if you push it forward by more than 10-15mm, your panhard bushes may bind and cause some weird behaviour and as Craig said you will also push the spring pads forward making them more likely to bind as well.
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Re: D1 - moving front axle forward?

Post by Slunnie »

TuffRR wrote:Is it feasible to use some spacer washers on both my radius arms to push them forward a bit (say 30mm max)? I'm thinking it may also have an effect on my steering geometry?
If there is enough thread left it sounds like be a good idea. Enough to clear the guard?
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by shakes »

something I done to my patrol... 12mm spacers search through the nissan section there is plenty of info. this mixed with some minor gaurd cutting and everything looked good

as you lift your car, the radius arms travel in an arc down and back thus even a 2" lift (which i assume you have) will "pull" the tire back towards the drivers door a fraction.

Simon
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Plenty of touring rangies and discos with a small BL.

I have also seen plenty with the rear edge of the front guard trimmed slightly and they look fine.

But moving the axle forward in the way you suggest shouldn't affect anything in a big way if it is only 10mm or so.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 2526
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Outcast Offroad

Post by Micka »

Umm...I'm still stuck on why a body lift is NOT a sensible idea :?: :?

I mean...compared to the dodgy idea that you are suggesting, a body lift sounds simply logical.

Lets look at it for a second, shall we?...

1. Use spacers at the radius arm mount to push the front diff forward with unknown effects on steering geometry and risk having your insurance company wipe you for illegal mods.

or...

2. Use approved materials to do an engineered approved body lift and have no further problems.

Oh...but its a tourer, so it can't possibly be subjected to something as radical as a body lift :roll:
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Micka wrote:Umm...I'm still stuck on why a body lift is NOT a sensible idea :?: :?

I mean...compared to the dodgy idea that you are suggesting, a body lift sounds simply logical.

Lets look at it for a second, shall we?...

1. Use spacers at the radius arm mount to push the front diff forward with unknown effects on steering geometry and risk having your insurance company wipe you for illegal mods.

or...

2. Use approved materials to do an engineered approved body lift and have no further problems.

Oh...but its a tourer, so it can't possibly be subjected to something as radical as a body lift :roll:
Have to say I agree Micka. I know people who have done more touring than most in OZ with BL'd rovers.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 2526
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Outcast Offroad

Post by Micka »

I would have thought that changing from 235/85/16 to a 265/75/16 would have had zero effect. They are about 2mm different in OD.

Is it the extra width of the 265 that is causing the problem?

What is it like on the rear spring mounts? I would imagine that the 265s would be rubbing there too. Or do you have zero offset rims?
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Post by TuffRR »

I've got nothing against body lifts - I've got a 2 inch BL in the Rangie which is fine for its purpose.

The discovery is a tourer and also the wifes car to drive around town. The point is to have it no higher than necessary and if i can do this without a BL then this is what i would prefer.

These 265's (Mickey T MTZ's) are a fair bit taller than my old 235's (Nankang Mudstars). It's not the width which is a problem though coz my old 235's used to rub in the same spot, just not so bad. All this on standard D1 steels - no rubbing on spring mounts.
Micka wrote: Lets look at it for a second, shall we?...

1. Use spacers at the radius arm mount to push the front diff forward with unknown effects on steering geometry and risk having your insurance company wipe you for illegal mods.
This is the point of my post - unknown effects on steering geometry. So can you enlighten me as to what these "unknown" effects are so that i can make an informed decision. :roll:
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

If you do it, there is not much you can moce it, because that nyloc still has to grip, maybe you could machine some off it, but i wouldn't get greedy, so just pack it out and tell us what happens

Or fit a body lift or trim the gaurds :D
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

Post by GURU »

I'm with the no body lift.....

I would space the front radius arms 10 - 15mm MAX and the front end will work fine. I think if you do this you will have to trim very little out of the guard.

Infact I'm planning on doing a 2" coil lift and lengthern rear arms and space front arms and fit 255/85's with minimal outer guard cutting
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 2588
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Hobart Tas

Post by Reddo »

I'm still unsure as to why this size tyre is hitting. Is is hiting the mud flap mounts?? We have had this problem with larger tyres, but soon fixed it with a very big knocking stick (hammer). Outer guards edges should be OK, and if not I'm with the trim them off brigade.

BL may not fix cause interference as suspension compression will still allow wheels/tyres to hit unless your BL is massive.
Nice gq swb ute chop with a huffer for the good times
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Post by TuffRR »

I've attached a pic to hopefully better explain where it is hitting. I reckon I could get close to a 10mm spacer on the radius arms with still leaving enough thread to exit the locknut.

It does seem to be a popular mod to Patrols to move axles forward using spacers - haven't read of any problems with Patrols....

Image
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 2588
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Hobart Tas

Post by Reddo »

I am surprised bout this 'cause we fitted 33's to ours and only had to trim a bit off there. Sure your front axle is in the right place, ie not pushed back due to slogged out rubbers/bushes??

I don't think a 10mm push would make any difference to handling etc given the standard axles could in theory move this much on the standard rubbers under extreme conditions.

Give it a go!!
Nice gq swb ute chop with a huffer for the good times
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Post by TuffRR »

Reddo wrote:I am surprised bout this 'cause we fitted 33's to ours and only had to trim a bit off there. Sure your front axle is in the right place, ie not pushed back due to slogged out rubbers/bushes??
I had thought this although they look fine visually from the outside. I have also got under and checked for movement on takeoff etc but there is nothing noticeable.

I think these are pretty big for 32's even.
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

I have the best idea!

I'll swap u my 245/75/16 ATR's and u Give me yr MT MTZ's and let me deal with the rubbing problems..... and i'll throw in a pack of carrots!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

dont go offering my farking carrots around BIATCH :finger: :finger:
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

landy_man wrote:dont go offering my farking carrots around BIATCH :finger: :finger:
U didnt touch them over 5 days they are mine to do with what i pls....

Tuff just remeber who tucked you in!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Post by TuffRR »

All this talk of carrots and tucking me in sounds a little :rainbowafro:
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

TuffRR wrote:All this talk of carrots and tucking me in sounds a little :rainbowafro:
Yr the one who wispered 'I love you' while i tucked you in.....
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

mickrangie wrote:
TuffRR wrote:All this talk of carrots and tucking me in sounds a little :rainbowafro:
Yr the one who wispered 'I love you' while i tucked you in.....
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posts: 1119
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:24 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Post by TuffRR »

mickrangie wrote: Yr the one who wispered 'I love you' while i tucked you in.....
Sorry, was talking to my right hand - you must of overheard. :D
Range Rover - 4.4 V8, MD Crawler Box, F&R Lockers, 35" Centipedes, 4" lift. Overqualified WebWheeler!!!

Discovery - Bling touring stuff!
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

Remind me not to go bush with you guys ,all this talk about carrots and tucking in is g.h.e.y ! :D
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

Loanrangie wrote:Remind me not to go bush with you guys ,all this talk about carrots and tucking in is g.h.e.y ! :D
3/4 bottle of shivers and 1/2 bottle of jonny and i dont know how much port between C and G made for interesting night.......
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

mind you with no more Ty to cuddle up with :cry: and another kid on the way, i will need some luvving ! lets go camp ....ing.
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
zen
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 7:45 am
Location: england

Post by zen »

you will have to cut the arches or raise body abit more(wether suspension or bl) mine still rub sometimes and i have had 3inch lift..

cutting the arches is good..quite easy..looks good to if you fit aftermarket flexi arches too..

leave the axles alone...you may also find if you move it forward that you will be needing a longer prop..you dont want that popping out at all!!!
Posts: 2526
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Outcast Offroad

Post by Micka »

10 - 15 mm probably wont have much effect of the steering geometry, the bushes should allow for this and will just wear a tad sooner.

I would still be either cutting the guards and fitting flares, or doing a BL to correct the problem.

The length of the driveshaft would not be a concern over such a small increase in wheelbase, I would imagine.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests