Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Radiator Shrowd

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1041
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Radiator Shrowd

Post by Mudzuki »

On my Suzuki Sierra, I currently have a 12" thermo that was mounted directly to the radiator by the previous owner, with the factory shrowd on the back. Radiator has seen better days so I have purchased a new one.

My question is to do with fabricating a new shrowd for a 14" thermo fan that I have lying around.

How much of a gap behind the radiator should the shrowd be mounted? Is 10mm enough?

How bad will it be not running a shrowd at all? The 14" fan covers a far greater area, maybe 80% of the radiator, and the shrowd will possibly make the "at speed" performance of the raditor suffer.

My options are to either mount the fan to a shrowd, or just to the radiator.

Opinions???

Thanks
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

Are you running the orig engine fan also?

Nic
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 1041
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by Mudzuki »

No, engine fan was removed by previous owner.

Fan will be setup between the radiator and engine.

Engine is stock 1.3, not that it matters.
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

You definitely need a shroud, although to be honest if you could get a used mechanical fan that would be better anyway.

The reason you need a shroud is that it forces the fan to draw air through the radiator. Without a shroud, the fan will suck air from above, below, and the sides, just moving air around behind the radiator rather than sucking it through... and hence not helping with cooling much at all.

I am not sure what you mean about a gap behind the radiator. The best set up for a shroud is that it has no gap next to the radiator, or just a small gap blocked with some closed-cell foam or similar material, just to allow for movement and vibration. The only air gap from fan to radiator should be what's required to allow the fan to turn. Anything more just lets air flow the wrong way..
This is not legal advice.
God of Athiests
Posts: 8337
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Post by DamTriton »

If you are referring to the gap between the fan and the radiator core then 10mm is fine, and the same would be OK for the fan edge to shroud gap as well. A lot depends on the stiffness of the fan blades.

The idea is to get them as close as possible for efficiency, but allow a bit of room for nasties such as the fan being bent a bit by hitting water in a river crossing.

As Chimpboy said the shroud itself should cover the radiator, but not "blank off" any areas of it.
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

if you are going to hook up a new thermo fan. i would put a switch inside the car to turn it off when you do water crossings................ saves bending fans etc
1hd-fte 5 speed tiptronic 105 series
78 series troopy for work
gu ute play truck For sale
FTE 80 series sahara Sold

i think i have a problem
Posts: 1041
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by Mudzuki »

The gap that i'm talking about is the amount of room behind the fins to the inner surface of the shrowd.

There needs to be some distance to avoid blanking off the parts of the radiator.

With the current setup, it sucks the air through, but not accross a large enough area, as it only draws trough on the outer edges of where the fan sits (approx 30% of the radiator). But the fan is not needed at highway speeds.

The reason for keeping the thermo setup is because i have two of the already, and I dont have an engine mounted fan.
Posts: 1889
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by just cruizin' »

It's not flash but here's a quick sketch

Image

try and maximse the volume between the shroud and the radiator to improve air flow.
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

Also, try and minimise the volume of white space in the above post. :D

Nice pic though mate, try to get that fan away from the radiator a bit like shown, to decrease dead spots where air does not flow.
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by smiley_smoke »

not trying to hijack but should the thermo be put on the front of the radiator or engine side?
i would be going for a thermatic switch and also a toggle switch to turn it off for water crossings..
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

Usually put on the engine side, I think most fans work better when pulling air through, rather than trying to push air through.
Some people use both and have a push-pull setup too.

Especially with a well designed shroud, the air would be pulled through the entire radiator, whereas a push though setup could result in 'dead space' areas where the air doesn't really flow through.
Posts: 1889
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by just cruizin' »

Typically on the engine side rather then infront. They pull air more effectively then they push it. ie resistance infront of the fan.
Posts: 1041
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by Mudzuki »

Thanks guys,

It's the 30 - 50mm dimension that i was curious about, as shown on the above pic.
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

Mudzuki wrote:Thanks guys,

It's the 30 - 50mm dimension that i was curious about, as shown on the above pic.
Thats how far back the fan sits from the radiator. This allows the fan to pull air from all areas of the radiator, and not create hot spots.

For example, if you leave no gap and mount the fan right on the radiator, you have no air flow through the radiator where the centre of the fan is located (motor, bearings etc). This means the middle of the rad will get hot, which isn't good.

The space allows air to be drawn through all of the core.
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by smiley_smoke »

sweet cheers for the info guys. sounds like engine side is the go. will have to muck around with the standard shroud.. or maybe make one?? :|
will see
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests