Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Air locker F/R

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Air locker F/R

Post by Struth »

Guys should I fit a front or a rear locker first to a 94 4Runner?
I can't afford both.

Can you fit them to diffs with ADD?

Cheers
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)

Post by lay80n »

Search matey, there is about eleventy billion threads about the same subject.

Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

lay80n wrote:Search matey, there is about eleventy billion threads about the same subject...
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Northern Sydney

Re: Air locker F/R

Post by rixrunner »

Struth wrote:Guys should I fit a front or a rear locker first to a 94 4Runner?
I can't afford both.

Can you fit them to diffs with ADD?

Cheers

Struth you can read yourself stupid on this subject and still be none wiser…… there are pros and cons for both.

Front = better for IFS but more prone to break CV’s

Back = not as good for traction but stronger (also easier to fit).

I have front and rear lockers in my 94 4Runner and this is what I reckon ……….

Start with the back but do all off your wiring to have both in the long run. It is heaps easier and cheaper while you are at it. Using only the back still makes a mass of difference in the runner. Flicking in the front is just better again……. Most of the 4Wdriving I think you are likely to do, would be fine with just the rear locked.

But seriously aim to get both done in the end….. they make the truck very capable and you will blow away a lot of IFS baggers :D While you are at it…… you should change to 4.88 centres if you haven’t yet (will suit your tyres). This is also cheaper and easier to do now.

Don’t know about the ADD……. but change it out anyway. Although…… with a rear locker, you can often just flick in the back and not even engage 4WD for light work.


Ricky
Last edited by rixrunner on Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Try to keep at least one wheel on the ground at all times !!!!!! (unless you want to do a jump....... thats different)
Posts: 1095
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 7:53 am
Location: SYDNEY

Post by thunder »

Put in the rear.
Bar work RDG
www.rdgengineering.com
ADRENALIN TRANSPORT
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: ormeau

Post by bastard »

Rear
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

Thanks guys, any takers for the front?

Oh and we all know search sucks :D

Cheers
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Weipa

Post by crankycruiser »

id say rear.. but a front one would strengthen the front diff heaps
Posts: 4494
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Golden Square

Post by turps »

If I could only afford one. I would put it in the front.
Most times I have been stuck in a SWB Patrol it was cos 1 front was free spinning. Even a rr locker didnt help. But the front wold make it idle over.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:41 am

Post by Redboy »

Front!!

And ADD is okay, better if you remove it but if you don/t just ensure you don't turn on 4wd on the fly.

And put on some free wheeling hubs
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:47 pm
Location: Manjimup, Western Australia

Post by ausyota »

I would go rear first.
Reason being you can chuck the rear locker on pretty much as soon as you hit the dirt without any major handling problems (other than being able to do powerslides in the gravel easier :twisted: ) and it will give you a heap of more ability.

Front is great too but its more of a "lock it in for the extreme stuff" kind of thing. Front also makes the weak IFS crownwheel and pinion a lot less likely to grenade.

If you were asking for a Poo-troll I would say front as they have a pretty good LSD in back and strong CVs in front that will handle it.

I have front and rear in my IFS Lux and it is fun showing up some of the solid front "IFS haters"
R.I.P Brock Fontanini 28-3-06 - 16-2-08
www.teamcarnage.net
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 1:35 am

Post by ozrunner »

Redboy wrote:.....but if you don/t just ensure you don't turn on 4wd on the fly.
BS :D

You don't need to remove ADD as thats what makes the air locker so suitable for an IFS 4Runner. When its not locked nothing is changed from normal ADD useage, ie use it as normal and only engage the locker as and when required etc.

Hubs are also not required.

But its still wise to fit them to any IFS 4Runner etc just for the fact they will stop the axles and CV's constantly turning when its really not necessary, especially when city driving etc.

But yes if you do fit hubs then they must be engaged before you select 4wd on the fly, irrespective whether you have any locker installed.
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by rvh96 »

rear first i hardly ever use my front locker but i used to have a RA RODEO with lockers and i had to use the front a lot more in that
'05 GU Patrol coil cab ST
6" lift
Tough dogs
Snake Racing drop arms
3rds Rear Arms
Twin ARB air lockers
37" trepadors
ARB bullbar
WARN winch
High flow turbo
3" mandrel bent exhaust
Posts: 2492
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by bazzle »

Rear locker .

Bazzle
Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Not where you are

Post by Gribble »

Front :D
\m/
Posts: 2480
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: NSW

Post by r0ck_m0nkey »

I have a 4runner and i am saying front first. Mainly because i got a second hand one for a fair price :lol:

But regardless i wanted a front first, to stop the wheel in the air from spinning, when they hit the ground, they have a tendancy of making the front diff go bang. My LSD Rear still actually works quite well, so didn't see the point in getting rid of that quite yet when it's not the end loosing the most traction.
If God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

Seems like front will be the go to avoid a spinning wheel landing and snapping a CV.

It was my first choice too, but like everyone sort of says, it's a personal prefference thing and you find out when you do it.

Cheers guys :D
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Northern Sydney

Post by rixrunner »

r0ck_m0nkey wrote: But regardless i wanted a front first, to stop the wheel in the air from spinning, when they hit the ground, they have a tendancy of making the front diff go bang.
How does a locker stop your front wheel spinning ??? In fact it makes the problem worse.
r0ck_m0nkey wrote: My LSD Rear still actually works quite well.
Doubt it.

Struth wrote:Seems like front will be the go to avoid a spinning wheel landing and snapping a CV.

It was my first choice too, but like everyone sort of says, it's a personal prefference thing and you find out when you do it.

Cheers guys :D

Bad choice Struth.... you might break more CV's


Ricky
Try to keep at least one wheel on the ground at all times !!!!!! (unless you want to do a jump....... thats different)
Posts: 2480
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: NSW

Post by r0ck_m0nkey »

rixrunner wrote:
r0ck_m0nkey wrote: But regardless i wanted a front first, to stop the wheel in the air from spinning, when they hit the ground, they have a tendancy of making the front diff go bang.
How does a locker stop your front wheel spinning ??? In fact it makes the problem worse.
Well when it's in the air it turns the same speed as the one on the ground. It may still be turning, but it's not spinning faster then everything else.
rixrunner wrote:
r0ck_m0nkey wrote: My LSD Rear still actually works quite well.
Doubt it.
You can doubt it all you like, i know it works.
rixrunner wrote:
Struth wrote:Seems like front will be the go to avoid a spinning wheel landing and snapping a CV.

It was my first choice too, but like everyone sort of says, it's a personal prefference thing and you find out when you do it.

Cheers guys :D

Bad choice Struth.... you might break more CV's


Ricky
Give me a broken CV over a broken diff any day, quicker, cheaper and easier to repair.
Last edited by r0ck_m0nkey on Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

IMO if the front diff is locked and one wheel is in the air, it will be spinning at the same rate as the other. Provided the locker actually gives you traction then you will be moving forward at the same speed as the surface speed of the tyre in the air.

When it lands it will encounter very little resistance and therefore should not break anything.

On the other hand if the wheel still on the ground is spinning rather than having traction, or not spinning because it isn't locked, then a CV will snap when the wheel off the ground eventually lands and gets some traction.

This is the only way I can see a locker contributing to a broken CV.

Am I missing something here :?:

Cheers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: NSW

Post by r0ck_m0nkey »

Struth wrote:This is the only way I can see a locker contributing to a broken CV.

Am I missing something here :?:
The other thing though is, If a wheel is in the air, the opposite side is pretty much taking all the force to move forward which can apply enough stress to break something aswell.

It's really just one of those things with Toyota IFS, you're at the lower end of strength when in comparison to other front setups of other vehicles. If you're doing things that lockers are a consideration, regardless of wether you have the locker or not, you're going to have to face some kind of breakage in the front end at some point or another in my opinion.

Just in my mind, breaking a CV isn't the end of the world, carrying a complete spare shaft isn't a costly thing to do or takes up much room. If it comes down to it, not that difficult to change out in the middle of no where either.
If God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?
Posts: 5256
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Struth »

the opposite side is pretty much taking all the force
fair point.
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:26 pm
Location: Canberra Australia

Post by Ezookiel »

Just my 2 cents worth, based on what I was told by another is:

Put it in the front.
Their reasoning was thus:

If you're climbing something and you have just barely enough traction, and your front loses traction, then the entire load falls to the rear wheels which is likely to cause them to also lose traction.
Putting in a front locker ensures that the front continue to carry its share of the load more of the time, and thus helps prevent the extra load being dumped on the rear so often.
[url=http://www.4x4him.org]Bringing the Christian Rock Crawling Community a little closer[/url]
Posts: 1047
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:27 pm
Location: Wollongong

re: locker

Post by Nelso »

A rear locker will push you up hills better as the majority of the cars weight is on the rear end.
What's the difference between ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.

I am an insomniac dyslexic agnostic. I often lay awake all night wondering if there really is a Dog.
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Cossie »

rear :D
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by rvh96 »

If your rear end looses traction when climbing thats about when forward motion stops reguardless of weather the front is still hooked up or not
'05 GU Patrol coil cab ST
6" lift
Tough dogs
Snake Racing drop arms
3rds Rear Arms
Twin ARB air lockers
37" trepadors
ARB bullbar
WARN winch
High flow turbo
3" mandrel bent exhaust
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

IF you have a decent working LSD in the rear (it is a Toyota, after all :D ) go the front locker first.

With rear LSD I rarely need the locker, and if locked front doesn't get me through I've got all 4 wheels spinning anyway - I don't think a rear locker would make enough difference for me to spend the money.

I think a "front locker causing breakages" is psychological - driver thinks "I've got a locker, I'm not giving up", so keeps trying until something gives. :roll:

Go the front.

Now, the ADD system. If you're talking air-lockers (ARB/TJM) there's no need to touch it (Pajeros have a similar system - no problems whatsoever. :D ) Auto-lockers are a different story...
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Northern Sydney

Post by rixrunner »

r0ck_m0nkey.... I like the avatar change.

Nice truck :D


Ricky
Try to keep at least one wheel on the ground at all times !!!!!! (unless you want to do a jump....... thats different)
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

Go the front first.
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 2588
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Hobart Tas

Post by Reddo »

na, rear first - for all the reasons above...
Nice gq swb ute chop with a huffer for the good times
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests