Micka wrote:Not quite sure what you are saying? The ARBs have been tested - by over 1000 competitors using them in winch comp trucks, tuff trucks, rock crawling buggies, outback challenge...and that's only Australia.Jacked wrote:lol. I think no one wants to test them because they are scared they wasted so much on arb's.
In a perfect world any way. "Pay peanuts and you get monkeys."
The Chinese version got tested too. Please refer to page 1 of this dog's breakfast of an arguement.
a once of bench test is almost useless. to use a different analagy (sp) A ferrari has more power on an engine dyno then an mk patrol. does this mean a ferrari will outlive an mk patrol? does it mean the ferrari will be faster through a bog hole?
Im not saying that either of these diff's are better then the other. On paper you would think the airleaker would be a better UNIT. But a fracture test at new doesnt show a difference for 50,000k's later? 1000s of lock/unlock cycles, oil contamination, heat durability etc. untill a small proportion of these china lockers are used you might as well be guessing. Im all for competition for arb, i dont care where it comes from. The more of these china lockers are made, the more money the company will make, the more engineering they will put into there product, the better the outcome and finally the more arb will realise to stop being a F#$ken rip off.