Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Grand Vitara XL-7 vs Feroza... thoughts after 2 weeks.
Moderator: Tiny
Grand Vitara XL-7 vs Feroza... thoughts after 2 weeks.
It's been about four weeks since the Feroza departed and two since I picked up the XL-7.
Of course it was going to be a "different" proposition to drive, however some things have surprised me. For a start my Feroza would easily outhandle the XL-7 through roundabouts and corners on the bitumen. Not what I was expecting.... The XL-7 is a chronic understeerer at what I'd only consider "moderate" speeds (tyre squeal rules ). I'm going to put that down partially to the crappy standard Bridgestone 687 HT tyres. It also requires an extra 1/2 to 3/4 turn of the steering wheel compared to the Feroza to get around corners- which initially makes it feel a bit cumbersome.
The XL-7 is sadly lacking in the underbody protection area, which surprised me. There's only a feeble plastic undertray to "protect" the sump and front diff. Feroza's aren't so "soft" afterall.
Ride comfort the XL-7 has an easy win. Same with straightline speed - I'm actually surprised at how well it goes if you floor it and the five speed auto is an excellent trans. Of course that speed comes at a price and my first tank revealed 13.8 litres / 100km and that was over 90% sedate driving. That's around 3 litres / 100km more than the Feroza.
Maintenance for the XL-7 is dead easy- no timing belt, no valve clearances to adjust, no grease nipples to do, no adjustment on the wheel bearings etc etc. Reading through the servicing schedule it should be really cheap to maintain. Genuine parts aren't too bad with an air filter costing $56; I think I paid not much less for a Ryco filter for the Feroza?
Of course it was going to be a "different" proposition to drive, however some things have surprised me. For a start my Feroza would easily outhandle the XL-7 through roundabouts and corners on the bitumen. Not what I was expecting.... The XL-7 is a chronic understeerer at what I'd only consider "moderate" speeds (tyre squeal rules ). I'm going to put that down partially to the crappy standard Bridgestone 687 HT tyres. It also requires an extra 1/2 to 3/4 turn of the steering wheel compared to the Feroza to get around corners- which initially makes it feel a bit cumbersome.
The XL-7 is sadly lacking in the underbody protection area, which surprised me. There's only a feeble plastic undertray to "protect" the sump and front diff. Feroza's aren't so "soft" afterall.
Ride comfort the XL-7 has an easy win. Same with straightline speed - I'm actually surprised at how well it goes if you floor it and the five speed auto is an excellent trans. Of course that speed comes at a price and my first tank revealed 13.8 litres / 100km and that was over 90% sedate driving. That's around 3 litres / 100km more than the Feroza.
Maintenance for the XL-7 is dead easy- no timing belt, no valve clearances to adjust, no grease nipples to do, no adjustment on the wheel bearings etc etc. Reading through the servicing schedule it should be really cheap to maintain. Genuine parts aren't too bad with an air filter costing $56; I think I paid not much less for a Ryco filter for the Feroza?
David
Re: Grand Vitara XL-7 vs Feroza... thoughts after 2 weeks.
Your using the wrong technique - its much faster to go across the roundabout but a bit noisier. Also makes a significant impression on passing motorists.murcod wrote: For a start my Feroza would easily outhandle the XL-7 through roundabouts
As for the rest - don't listen to the bad man kiddies, he's been overcome by Suzuki exhaust fumes.
( usual disclaimers )
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
That roundabout technique doesn't work too well for right hand turns!
BTW I think my thoughts show how good a vehicle the Feroza is- I'm comparing a 2004 model XL-7 to a 1992 Feroza! The maintenance side of things is a blessing- although my near new McNaught grease gun which I've only used once is now useless to me.
If anyone is doing an engine conversion for their Feroza and can get a Suzuki 2.7l V6 cheap then I'd say do it! With the lighter body it would really fly.
BTW I think my thoughts show how good a vehicle the Feroza is- I'm comparing a 2004 model XL-7 to a 1992 Feroza! The maintenance side of things is a blessing- although my near new McNaught grease gun which I've only used once is now useless to me.
If anyone is doing an engine conversion for their Feroza and can get a Suzuki 2.7l V6 cheap then I'd say do it! With the lighter body it would really fly.
David
Re: Grand Vitara XL-7 vs Feroza... thoughts after 2 weeks.
Pff. Rocky's have NO sump guard. Thats how tuff they are. Dont need emmurcod wrote:
The XL-7 is sadly lacking in the underbody protection area, which surprised me. There's only a feeble plastic undertray to "protect" the sump and front diff. Feroza's aren't so "soft" afterall.
As for the rest, how is it timed Gear or chain?
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
if its the same or derived from the V6 in the Vitara - they have a history of chain problems ( tensioner failures IIRC ) leading to other nasties. Also oil pump and rear main seal problems. Llike all cars they have their own unique series of issues.
As for the right hand roundabout turns - mere technical detail
As for the right hand roundabout turns - mere technical detail
( usual disclaimers )
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Yes, the earlier models (pre 2002?) are well known for the number 1 tensioner issue. Mine's whisper quiet as you'd expect for a log book serviced engine with under 50000km covered. The type of oil (low viscosity) and regular changes also play a part from what a Suzuki Mech told me.
Like any car they can have their common problems. IMHO regular maintenance goes a long way to preventing a lot of them. For any brand the problem vehicles are usually poorly maintained examples.
Like any car they can have their common problems. IMHO regular maintenance goes a long way to preventing a lot of them. For any brand the problem vehicles are usually poorly maintained examples.
David
The XL-7? - yes probably right. The diff ratio in the XL-7 is lower than a normal V6 Vitara and I've read the ARB lockers although listed aren't an easy fit to even the normal Vits.MightyMouse wrote:Being post 2002 doest that mean you can't get transfer gears / lockers for it ?
Given it's an auto the gear situation isn't so critical for what I'd be using it for.
I can however get an off the shelf snorkel and a guy in QLD sells bash plates but the logisitics in getting them here is a bit daunting. (Length and weight.)
I'll be looking at the suspension first and decent tyres once these ones wear out.
David
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests