Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

holly carby

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: Australia

holly carby

Post by bornstar15 »

just wondering if anyone has heard of a 180 holly carby fitting to a sierra i saw it on a website and was just wondering if the holly had the same problem as the weber in stalling on up hill climbs and roughly the price and any problems ppl have had installing them thanks
Azza
1.3lt 2inch lift 2inch extshakles extractors 2inch strait through exhaust 30x9.50 firestone firehawks sunnys no swaybar upgraded headlights rodeoshock up front with patrol shocks rear
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

Holleys are even worse on hills.
OK if performance is your aim but not exactly fuel efficient.
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I haven't driven a holley powered suzuki, but I have driven a holley powered rangie and it was a pig in the bush. Depending on what way round you mounted the carb, you could either have it stall out going uphill or down hill.

I'm sure there are all the workarounds to fix the problem, but really, unless you have made MAJOR gasflow changes to the 1.3 ( cam, exhaust, porting, compression ratio etc) the biggest likely change is that you will just get poor fuel consumption, possibly poor cold starting and might pick up some midrange throttle response, but odds are, it'll be running rich.

I'm sure the holley will be able to supply plenty of fuel at the top end, but as I said, unless you have major changes in the motors ability to breathe, this will be a waste.

So what problem with the factory carb were you trying to fix with the holley?

*Rant on* (not having a go at your strightforward question, but htis is in response to all the run XYZ carb replies you'll get)

In every thread about playing with carbs on sierras, I have yet to see ANYONE run one with a wide band 02 sensor or with dyno sheets to prove the fuelling and power of the new carby. Its all seat of the pants, and the following points are true of seat of the pants testing:

The more noise it makes, the faster it goes
The more you spent, the faster it goes.
Increases in power of at least 10% are undetectable in "seat of the pants" testing... how much power have you gained again?

*rant off* :oops:

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: Australia

Post by bornstar15 »

no problem jsut looking to start to upgrade my engine ive spent to much on things that dont make the thing any better (sound system spotties) and i want to be able to have some more horses under the foot jsut looking for a cheap side of things tho
1.3lt 2inch lift 2inch extshakles extractors 2inch strait through exhaust 30x9.50 firestone firehawks sunnys no swaybar upgraded headlights rodeoshock up front with patrol shocks rear
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

Just make certain that its tuned properly now...

Things like plugs, valve clearances etc etc.. all terribly boring but it does matter.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)

Post by lay80n »

Why not look at fuel injection, either from a motor sway, or retro-fitting vit single point injection to a 1.3l motor. Major improvement off road, cold start perfect every time, less emmissions, and a pretty simple system to understand and work on.

Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

I was sure Holley 180 was a "copy"ofthe weber 32/36 but apparently only some are. I fits the same as the weber read the weber threads on here, no mater what others say there IS a definate power increase throughout the range. As to running "rich" couldnt it be re jetted inexpensively?
Nik
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

NIK - got before and after dyno figures ?
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

No I dont but it holds hills now and revs through to redline a hell of alot quicker.
Nik
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

NIK - ok thanks for that, was just curious to try and put some numbers on the table.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

I've got a 180 holley here that I took off the last zook I bought. I could never get it running right. I'm sure the carby gurus could have got it working properly, but for me it was easier to swap a standard carby back onto it. For what I use the car for, it suits me better. There's a 10 page weber thread on here somewhere.
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:45 am
Location: Sailsbury-Brisbania

Post by JrZook »

MightyMouse wrote:NIK - ok thanks for that, was just curious to try and put some numbers on the table.
Ive only got an after which was 45rwkw. Weber 32/36, 235/75bfg mudds, extractors, 2inch system, s1 grasshopper and 3.9 diffs.

Cheers Dan
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

JrZook wrote:
MightyMouse wrote:NIK - ok thanks for that, was just curious to try and put some numbers on the table.
Ive only got an after which was 45rwkw. Weber 32/36, 235/75bfg mudds, extractors, 2inch system, s1 grasshopper and 3.9 diffs.

Cheers Dan
Thanks Dan, but without the "before" its really hard to know what's been achieved.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:45 am
Location: Sailsbury-Brisbania

Post by JrZook »

MightyMouse wrote:
JrZook wrote:
MightyMouse wrote:NIK - ok thanks for that, was just curious to try and put some numbers on the table.
Ive only got an after which was 45rwkw. Weber 32/36, 235/75bfg mudds, extractors, 2inch system, s1 grasshopper and 3.9 diffs.

Cheers Dan
Thanks Dan, but without the "before" its really hard to know what's been achieved.
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:45 am
Location: Sailsbury-Brisbania

Post by JrZook »

MightyMouse wrote:
JrZook wrote:
MightyMouse wrote:NIK - ok thanks for that, was just curious to try and put some numbers on the table.
Ive only got an after which was 45rwkw. Weber 32/36, 235/75bfg mudds, extractors, 2inch system, s1 grasshopper and 3.9 diffs.

Cheers Dan
Thanks Dan, but without the "before" its really hard to know what's been achieved.
Yea i guess your right. Just giving you a baseline number that I had. Comparing this to the stock 47 odd kws, it goes to show that with the addition of the power robbing mods I'm back near stock power. Hopefully when I get back to Oz i can whack the old std carb on and go for another few runs.
Cheers Dan.
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

Still sometimes the vehicle is more drivable - ie you might have shifted or reshaped the torque curve. Having torque when you need it IMO is more important than outright power where you don't.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

I thought 47kw was at the flywheel if so 45 at the wheels with bigger/heavier tyres looks good.
If it helps when I went from 1300 with weber to STOCK 1600 there was a noticable difference.Then when I put the 1300 manifold and weber on it felt like the same gain again.
Nik
Posts: 2199
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 4:59 pm
Location: dandenong vic

Post by built4thrashing »

Ive driven with several carbys on my zook and i found the weber is the best for out right grunt. But if you want to run a snorkel then it will struggle for air flow as it is prone to rob air from each throat. ive run a 3k and 4k corolla carbs and they have similar probs but not as bad as the weber but no where as grunty as the weber. the stock carby was prob the best if using a snorkel but performance and outright grunt was piss weak in comparason to the weber and corolla carb.

In my opinion.
best carby with a snorkel is prob the stock carby.
best outright grunt carby is a weber with a ramflowfilter.
best allround carbyis the corolla 4K


i run a 4K carby atm. sports filter for the HWY and snorkel in the bush.


gonna play with a sidedraft carby soon.
1999 SQ625 Manual Grand Vitara. Lifted, Twin Locked, 31' Extremes, dual Batteries, Winch.
Lots of custom gear as I cant afford the proper stuff.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests