Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Will This Work Well?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Will This Work Well?

Post by 11_evl »

im coiling the front of my sierra.
im looking into options for the links when i found this.
how will it perfom and from EXPERIENCE what am i expecting from it if i descide to do it that way??
i want to run a 5 link style

Image
Image
michael
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Z()LTAN »

they work fairly well, but its really a glorified 3link (radial arm setup)

Still needs a pahnard too.

Pros: Easy to manufacture, easier to clear sump than a 5link

Cons: Lots of stress on the main link (has to resist twist too), pinion angle cycles through some very wack angles
Locktup4x4.com.au - For all of your hardcore gear

Outlaws4x4.com
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

Wouldn't the pinion angles be very similar to that of a regular radius arm setup?
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

would have thought tri 3 link + panhard would have been a better option than that
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

:shock: ....there are so many things wrong in those two pics....... :shock:
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

Slunnie wrote:Wouldn't the pinion angles be very similar to that of a regular radius arm setup?
please explain
michael
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

Tiny wrote:would have thought tri 3 link + panhard would have been a better option than that
please explain
michael
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

joeblow wrote::shock: ....there are so many things wrong in those two pics....... :shock:
you guessed it
please explain
michael
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

In a radius arm setup the axle rotates like its fixed to the ends of the radius arms as the axle moves up and down. That setup will do much the same.

A 3-link + panhard is a very similar setup, except the link which goes from the top of the axle to half way up the lower link instead travels all the way back to a chassis mounted pivot point.

The 3 things that I saw straight away that were a worry was the bird shit weld which currently joins the upper and lower links - I think that will break. The other is that the steering and suspension links look like they have been designed by some drug farked engineer and I'm not sure what that is on, but its a typical shocker that would come from Jeep or something where they forgot to understand stress and fatigue in design. ie, the lower link will probably bend in the middle where the upper link joins - assuming the weld doesn;t break first. who knows it may even bend as it fights against the panhard when articulating. The drag link has a massive bend in it and the brake lines are just waiting to get ripped out. Actually the ball joint on the pitman arm will probably also snap through the thread from having angles forces put through it. Hmmmm as I keep looking, what the go with the bend in the springs from the upper spring retainers.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 1293
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: Ferntree Gully

Post by Bluefreak »

^^^no more explaining...lolol

The idea is solid, IF that's what you want - just don't let whoever welded that shit together anywhere near your zook...
I wish my lawn was EMO, then it would cut itself...
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

Bluefreak wrote:just don't let whoever welded that shit together anywhere near your zook...
That one looks left hand drive.

Search Trilink or ylink. Some of the Jeep kits run this setup. That one looks home grown.
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: In a van down by the river.

Post by locktup4x4 »

It also needs more vertical separation.

Jason
LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
LOCKTUPFABRICATION.COM
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

locktup4x4 wrote:It also needs more vertical separation.

Jason
that was my MAIN concern about doing it this way
plus the stress it will put on the middle of the lower arm.
yes it is LHD and no the owner will not be working on my car.
A 3-link + panhard is a very similar setup, except the link which goes from the top of the axle to half way up the lower link instead travels all the way back to a chassis mounted pivot point.
i think this is the setup i will do.
im after more movement than a nissan but limited to not as much as a full flexy 5 link set up, if that makes sence
michael
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)

Post by lay80n »

11_evl wrote:
locktup4x4 wrote:It also needs more vertical separation.

Jason
that was my MAIN concern about doing it this way
plus the stress it will put on the middle of the lower arm.
yes it is LHD and no the owner will not be working on my car.
A 3-link + panhard is a very similar setup, except the link which goes from the top of the axle to half way up the lower link instead travels all the way back to a chassis mounted pivot point.
i think this is the setup i will do.
im after more movement than a nissan but limited to not as much as a full flexy 5 link set up, if that makes sence

A 3 link + panhard will net you just as much flex as a five link if done properly. The amound of flex you end up with will most likley be decided by spring and shock setup/selection.

Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 5:34 pm

Post by azzad »

im after more movement than a nissan but limited to not as much as a full flexy 5 link set up, if that makes sence
Design it with a X link setup as well?

Dazza
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

azzad wrote:
im after more movement than a nissan but limited to not as much as a full flexy 5 link set up, if that makes sence
Design it with a X link setup as well?

Dazza
that thought did cross my mind.
but i am still steering more towards 2 lowers, 1 upper and a panhard. just after experiences with different configurations of that
michael
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

azzad wrote:
Design it with a X link setup as well?

Dazza
thats a worse idea!

ALL the instability of a 3 link with none of the AS benefits :? may as well put a radius arm on one side and a single link on the other.
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

lay80n wrote: A 3 link + panhard will net you just as much flex as a five link if done properly. The amound of flex you end up with will most likley be decided by spring and shock setup/selection.

Layto....
I would change this statement around.
A 3link+ panhard will out flex a five link.

"A well setup five link may net you as much flex as a 3 link + panhard" is how I would have worded it :)
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

1MadEngineer wrote:ALL the instability of a 3 link with none of the AS benefits :? may as well put a radius arm on one side and a single link on the other.
That is theoretically what this guy has done. It's just not right, looking at them pictures is actually quiet scary!
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

GRIMACE wrote:
lay80n wrote: A 3 link + panhard will net you just as much flex as a five link if done properly. The amound of flex you end up with will most likley be decided by spring and shock setup/selection.

Layto....
I would change this statement around.
A 3link+ panhard will out flex a five link.

"A well setup five link may net you as much flex as a 3 link + panhard" is how I would have worded it :)
meh, 6 of one :finger:

I do agree, since my first post, I think a 3+panhard is one of the best option, proided you get the set up right and have no sump clearence issues
Posts: 1325
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: brisbane australia..logan reserve

Post by 11_evl »

i think i will be able to set it up and clear the sump comfortably.
having cruiser rears for the lowers and another rod for the upper, the one i got to use is about 70-75% shorter than the lower.
not ideal??
i think they state no less than 80%???
as i said i dont really want it to massive flex in the front and be tippy from loose suspension that is too flexy.
michael
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 5:34 pm

Post by azzad »

1MadEngineer wrote:
azzad wrote:
Design it with a X link setup as well?

Dazza
thats a worse idea!

ALL the instability of a 3 link with none of the AS benefits :? may as well put a radius arm on one side and a single link on the other.
I take it ur not a fan of the X Link; even with a lock out pin?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests