Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

1HZ Fuel Consumption?

Tech Talk for Cruiser owners.

Moderators: toaddog, Elmo, DUDELUX

Post Reply
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 1:06 pm
Location: Tasmania

1HZ Fuel Consumption?

Post by BUNDERA »

Just wondering if people could post up some figures regarding fuel consumption of the 4.2L (Six Cylinder) Diesel Engine (in any model toyota).

If you have oversize tyres fitted, could you please include the difference you found when going bigger and what size tyres you are currently running.

How would a 1HZ Troopie cope with 35"s and what would be an estimated fuel consumption?

Regards,

Nick
______________________
PRAISE THE LIFTED
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 6:07 pm
Location: lost

Post by fatassgq »

Had a 1hz in a 75 series ute. Non turbo.
fuel consumption is shithouse when on the road with 35's but still good compared to petrol.
Mine was high and pretty wide a lot of the time (spacers) and I really noticed a difference in consumption when going from 33's to 35's.

Power suffered considerably too but not to the point that you would be holding up traffic or anything. Still very good offroad due to low down torque and gearing of the deisel.
I had extractors and straight thru muffler and k&n filter etc which seemed to help a lot too.

Good luck. Definitely worth having 35's or bigger and sacrificing some speed on road even if you do chew a bit more juice.

BTW I got anywhere from 350 to 450 km per 65l of fuel depending on what driving etc.
Before all the mods I think I got up to 600 km per 65/70litres
Posts: 549
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 11:53 am
Location: Sydney

Post by slowhilux »

I got a 1HZ 80 series, with 35" BFG Muds. Average is about 13L/100km. Its a friggin heavy thing too mind you

Phill
Phill
1995 DX 80 series, brought to you by:- 1HDFTE, A750, PWR, Secret Squirrell Steinbauer, BFG, GME, Engel, ARB, Kaymar, and my empty wallet!
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 1:06 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by BUNDERA »

Thanks so far! These are exactly the sort of comments that I am after!

Cheers,
Nick
______________________
PRAISE THE LIFTED
Posts: 1175
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 6:25 pm
Location: sydney

Post by XXXL80 »

i got 900km outta both tanks, 90 & 50 i think from mem.
that was flat out at 120kmh with 35's. and a turbo
my 80 is gone :(

check out my new website:

http://members.optusnet.com.au/pearsallk/index.html
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 8:49 am
Location: KILL - SCYTH

Post by 80diesel4play »

With stockers on mine and no lift - 1300 per tanks

Now with 5" lift and 35's - lucky to get 800 from 140L.

Do have exhaust and pump tickled for more fuel = more fun in bush.

Now thinking turbo will bring eceonomy back (unless i'm boooooooooosstting everywhere :D - which - I think I will be....)

Either Turbo or diff gears once you run 35's would be necessary - or extratcors and good dyno tune...
80 Series Turbo - the Toy car...
XR6 Turbo - the work car...
XW wagon - the dogs car...
Posts: 1175
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 6:25 pm
Location: sydney

Post by XXXL80 »

80diesel4play wrote:With stockers on mine and no lift - 1300 per tanks

Now with 5" lift and 35's - lucky to get 800 from 140L.

Do have exhaust and pump tickled for more fuel = more fun in bush.

Now thinking turbo will bring eceonomy back (unless i'm boooooooooosstting everywhere :D - which - I think I will be....)

Either Turbo or diff gears once you run 35's would be necessary - or extratcors and good dyno tune...


trust me the turbo does not make the much diff in fuel econ! either do diff gears! i have had both, the diff gears went south as the rev way to high for freeway work, but kept the turbo as it does give it a bit more omph..
my 80 is gone :(

check out my new website:

http://members.optusnet.com.au/pearsallk/index.html
Posts: 6021
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 11:01 pm
Location: Shed.

Post by dumbdunce »

hrm I have found the turbo to make a fair difference in economy - better around town but worse on the freeway, probably because you CAN do everything at 120 you do. in the 80 I get about 11 litres/100km with 5" lift and stocker wheels (yes it looks gay) town and 12 - 13 litres/100km highway depending on how hard it is pushed, if you go very soft on it and keep it around 100km/h it is spectacular, 10.5l/100km but it is hard to be disciplined to keep it that slow all the time. on the other hand it will go 10 all day without raising a sweat so the turbo is worth the $.

injection timing, injector condition, valve timing (timing belt condition), oil selection (5W30 recommended for later models!) and oil condition (religious 5000km change interval) make differences to fuel economy. overfuelling for extra power is not a good idea on any indirect injected diesel, it makes the EGT's go unacceptably high, and can burn exhaust valves, crack precombustion chambers (which can fall apart and cause really catastrophic damage), soots up the oil too quickly, and causes the engine to wear unacceptably quickly.

if you can afford it, go for a 1HD-T or 1HD-FT, they are direct injected and have reliable 200kW+ potential with bigger turbo, intercooling and tuning, without internal modification. 140 - 150kW is the best you can reliably expect from an internally standard 1HZ, the indirect injection makes the motor less and less efficient as the boost goes up to the point where stuffing more air in just causes the engine to get hotter without valuable power gains - around 10 - 12psi boost.
Free air locker to the first 20 callers!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests