Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Front Wheel Drive Vehicles - Whats strongest in Manaual

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Hawkesbury, Sydney

Front Wheel Drive Vehicles - Whats strongest in Manaual

Post by CWBYUP »

Hi All

I have a project racing buggy that I am looking at.

I need to know what the strongest Front Wheel Driven car you have seen or used etc.

Ideally a 1.3 L Front wheel drive, efi with power steer but beggars cant be picky.

I have been ready Mocks buggy build but that is build for Crawling, I am looking at building something for speed.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers Nick
[quote="Vulcanised"]more grunt than a row of drunk girls at a B&S ball!
[/quote]
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

sort out your gearing and you'll find out that you don't need strength in the manual. Your in the equivalent of low range all the time (even if you run 2.5:1 ford 9" diffs) so the gearbox doesn't see much load. how you are going to get enough speed out of it though is another problem.

It's not easy to swap non-matching transverse gearboxes to different motors. your gearbox choice will be dictated by the engine choice AFAIK. Probably the strongest FWD gearbox would be a PPG dog gear equipped EVO lancer gearbox, but I think you'll struggle to get under 1600cc with that block/gearbox combination.

next option might be the 6 speed ZF gearbox used in the last shape mini cooper S. Apparently a very high quality gearbox- ours did 120000km easily.

Just some ideas.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 4494
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Golden Square

Post by turps »

Gwagensteve wrote:sort out your gearing and you'll find out that you don't need strength in the manual. Your in the equivalent of low range all the time (even if you run 2.5:1 ford 9" diffs) so the gearbox doesn't see much load. how you are going to get enough speed out of it though is another problem.

Steve.
Steve, I would be thinking if he is after speed it might be used for a rear engine setup. Not as in mocks case, where it drives a pair of diffs.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

What about Pajero IFS setup or IFS/IRS?? The diesels have 140kw/500NM.

Aside from that, Evo Lancer, WRX, 380/Magna....???
Yom
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:13 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Yom »

Theres a few rally built gearboxes for 1.3L sort of vehicles getting around.

Daihatsu Charades, Nissan Micras. Suzuki Swifts all come to mind as vehicles which have had gearboxes built up by the rally sorts and even the Cup challenges in Japan. And all have 800cc to 1.5L 4cyls.

I happen to know you can bolt a 1.6L (GA16DE) Nissan Pulsar gearbox straight onto a Nissan Micra 1.3L (CG13DE) engine as well. You'd need forced induction to kill that setup. Standard micra gearbox not so crash hot..I ruined the diff in mine. :lol:
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by TheOtherLeft »

turps wrote:
Gwagensteve wrote:sort out your gearing and you'll find out that you don't need strength in the manual. Your in the equivalent of low range all the time (even if you run 2.5:1 ford 9" diffs) so the gearbox doesn't see much load. how you are going to get enough speed out of it though is another problem.

Steve.
Steve, I would be thinking if he is after speed it might be used for a rear engine setup. Not as in mocks case, where it drives a pair of diffs.
A bit OT but which would have better weight balance - front or rear engined buggy? I suppose it would depend on the type of terrain/event - rocks or racing
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

most likely mid-rear engine - as then the driver can be on the front wheels and steer very precisely, while their view is not obstructed by the engine.

as for strong FWD, how about corolla?
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Yom
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:13 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Yom »

alien wrote:most likely mid-rear engine - as then the driver can be on the front wheels and steer very precisely, while their view is not obstructed by the engine.

as for strong FWD, how about corolla?
corolla gearbox is quite weak

MR2 apparently has a slightly better unit.
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

What about IFS from Mazda MPS/turbo diesel, Focus XR5, Skyline (R32-33). Definately strong units.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

will it be 2wd or 4wd ?

How about something from an MR2 already rear engined ?
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:20 pm
Location: Marong, Victoria

Post by Rockmonsta »

Daihatsu Charade or Applause, bit of variety with ratios, cheap and plentiful. I run a Detomaso charade rally car, found strenght to be good.

Cheers
Posts: 3523
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:27 am
Location: Fairfield,Sydney

Post by pongo »

love_mud wrote:will it be 2wd or 4wd ?

How about something from an MR2 already rear engined ?
a rav4 gear box will bolt up to a MR2 engine apparently. a Mate did it in a buggy
Master of my own domain
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Post by mike_nofx »

FORD Sierra?
Posts: 2590
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:33 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Chucky »

Ford laser.

I had one for a while with the 1.5 efi 5 speed, drove it like it was stolen and it never died.
A mate had the 1.3? carby 4 speed and that thing survived more than mine did.
Posts: 1321
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Jamisiontown NSW

Post by MARKx4 »

SR20det?
Its not cool, unless it's got boost :)
Posts: 4426
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by bru21 »

gen 3 3sgte AWD would be my first choice
gen 2 3sgte fwd layout rwd would be my second choice
ADHD Racing would like to thank
Mrs Bru @ Sunshine Coast Developmental Physiotherapy - www.scdphysio.com.au , Ryano @ Fourbys www.generaltire.com.au Blitzkrieg Motorsport
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

MARKx4 wrote:SR20det?
GTiR Pulsar.

Ford Laser/Mazda TX5 Turbo (2L i think) is another one.
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Hawkesbury, Sydney

Post by CWBYUP »

First of all thanks for all the replies.

I am looking at building a Off Road Race Buggy instead of a class 8 4x4.

I am thinking of using a front engine & gear box combo instead of a VW or Albins gear box set up which will cost a bomb.

The plan is 1.3 or 1.6 L front wheel drive engine that will cop a bit of abuse.

Find a buggy / vw / some beast lying around that I can use the suspension etc from as a starting point and going from there.

If it looks promising I will finish the GQ and flog that off as the buggy will so much lighter and easier to tow for when I do long trips.

Rockmonsta wrote:Daihatsu Charade or Applause, bit of variety with ratios, cheap and plentiful. I run a Detomaso charade rally car, found strenght to be good. Cheers
Where Can I find some more info on that ?

Again thanks for all the info.

Nick
[quote="Vulcanised"]more grunt than a row of drunk girls at a B&S ball!
[/quote]
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

mike_nofx wrote:FORD Sierra?
They are RWD or AWD in the case of the Cosworth .
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:50 pm
Location: Wollongong, NSW

Post by Dodgy Dave »

I had a 2.0L turbo Lancer with just over 200kw using a 1.6L (F5M22) gearbox, 5 puck ceramic clutch and lightened flywheel. At 180kw It lasted 8 years, but only 6 months when the boost got turned up. The KM210 from the Hyundai sonata are stronger and have better gear ratios, LSD's are available from the states.

The Mitsu 1.6 engine is a detuned version of the 2.0L so alot of the parts can be interchanged and are easily sourced cheaply. There are very minor exterior details from the 1.6 4G61 compared to the 2.0L 4G63 Even the engine mounts are almost the same, So going the 2.0L would be a wiser choice.
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Nth Tassie

Post by uted1 »

Bit bigger than what your after, but mates buggy has a 2.6ltr and 5 speed out of a magna rear mounted. cops an absolute flogging on the beach in dunes and on the occasional bush track, and he hasn't killed it yet
Image
1966 fj45v
68 fj 40 build http://downunder4x4.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9759
1964 fj45 Hot rod
1982 fj45 Troopie
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:01 pm
Location: Werribee, Victoria

Post by gg_courier05 »

I had a 2003 Toyotoa Corolla, 1.8L engine, 5 spd manual, was a great car, very reliable engine, cost nothing on servicing, only needs oil and water and the car has done 180,000kms before the factory clutch needed replacing.

See how you go but i would recommend these, toyota engines are great, corolla's from the early 80's are still going strong, the body's might be a bit rough but they still drive well.

Will be interested to see what you choose.
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Hawkesbury, Sydney

Post by CWBYUP »

uted1 wrote: Image
That is the style I am going for.

gg_courier05 - 1.8 puts me up a class and if I want to race race the big boys I will get my arse handed to me.

Actually thing about it I will probably get flogged in the class I am aiming for as well.

I am looking at Clubman Buggy ( class 6 up to 1650cc ) or Pro lite ( class 1 and up to 3500cc ).

I will keep you all updated once I find a suitable frame.

Cheers Nick
[quote="Vulcanised"]more grunt than a row of drunk girls at a B&S ball!
[/quote]
Posts: 4225
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: sunshine coast australia

Post by mud4b »

i would avoid the GTI-R Pulsar / sr20 gearbox, they are weak as piss unless you put the dog kit for them.


Something your after is the gti suzuki swift 1.3 engine, then put the suzuki swift 1.6 gearbox onto it then the equivalent holden barina (same shape as a swift) diff center and you have basically a indestructible gearbox/ diff.

cheers mark.
Mud4b/ OPT, Cheap rates, Not cheap work. Search Opt- option offroad on facebook. Call or Sms 0439609525.. Sunshine coast, Eudlo, 4554.
Posts: 4426
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by bru21 »

I have watched a fair few buggies race and it still escapes me why they are rear mount. They jump very poorly, need a different driving style to drive (cannot steer) and will cost $ in cv's.

make a mini truggy - 4age with t50 or auto and hilux rear diff. cheap and different. can then run an arm front.

edit - a smaller version of this:

http://www.trophylite.com/
ADHD Racing would like to thank
Mrs Bru @ Sunshine Coast Developmental Physiotherapy - www.scdphysio.com.au , Ryano @ Fourbys www.generaltire.com.au Blitzkrieg Motorsport
Posts: 2732
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:50 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by stuee »

bru21 wrote:I have watched a fair few buggies race and it still escapes me why they are rear mount. They jump very poorly, need a different driving style to drive (cannot steer) and will cost $ in cv's.

make a mini truggy - 4age with t50 or auto and hilux rear diff. cheap and different. can then run an arm front.

edit - a smaller version of this:

http://www.trophylite.com/
Could that compete in the clubman or prolite class in that layout though? A truggy with brumby shell would be ultra bogan :cool:

Or go the proton jumbuck??

Edit* Just had a look, if you bodied the mini truggy to resemble a vehicle of some sort then it could go in extreme 2wd or 4wd class, otherwise if its simply a front engined buggy without body work it could compete in any of the buggy classes except clubman buggy which has quite a lot of build regs.
Last edited by stuee on Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Scott- wrote:Isn't it a bit early in the day to be pissed? :finger:
Posts: 2732
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:50 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by stuee »

And to totally steal the thread a mini truggy class could be very cost effective, no need for expensive transmissions or cv's. Maybe my off-road racing dreams will one day become a reality!! :D
-Scott- wrote:Isn't it a bit early in the day to be pissed? :finger:
Posts: 4073
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by lump_a_charcoal »

How about a GSXR 1000 motor?
Posts: 2472
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 4:17 pm
Location: Blaxland... Just up from Renriff!

Post by -Nemesis- »

mud4b wrote:i would avoid the GTI-R Pulsar / sr20 gearbox, they are weak as piss unless you put the dog kit for them.
x2

One of the few factory AWD east west manual boxes I've heard of that doesn't have a glass jaw reputation is the Galant VR4.
Lovin the FZJ105-T, bling by Ryano
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Hawkesbury, Sydney

Post by CWBYUP »

lump_a_charcoal wrote:How about a GSXR 1000 motor?
Gear box is to weak.
[quote="Vulcanised"]more grunt than a row of drunk girls at a B&S ball!
[/quote]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests