Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

What do you think??

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:12 pm
Location: Brisbane southside

What do you think??

Post by Grantw »

What do we all think of this topic? It has some very different opinions!


http://www.pajeroclub.com.au/forum/foru ... =5673&PN=1
09 Mitsu Evo X Mr
09 Suzuki Swift
09 VW 190kw Tiguan
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Neutral is for idling with the air-con on at lights (or tuning the old POS.) A car shouldn't move in neutral.
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:29 pm
Location: Brisney Land

Post by Thor »

always in gear... some control is better than none.
need to get to know your vehicle better if you choose neutral over a gear.
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 2:06 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by PAJMAN »

Neutral is SCARY !!

Even an auto in low 1st (or reverse) will provide some engine braking if the beast gets away from you downhill, but in neutral you have nothing to stop you hitting terminal velocity if you have a brake mishap. If you are going to have to use brakes to slow your auto why not leave it in gear as well as a backup? Trying to steer on a steep slope under brakes can result in locking wheels which makes steering very difficult, especially in reverse as the front wheels have little weight on them and tend to slide straight downhill no matter which way they are pointed.

Having said that, I have on occasions had to inch down short sections of very steep stuff very very slowly under brakes when low 1st was too fast, but I really don't recommend it and I hate the feeling when a wheel locks momentarily and the opposite one accelerates to double speed.
3.5 L with too much stuff, and a front locker waiting on the shelf.
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

I would not want to reverse down a steep hill in neutral in ANY vehicle manual or auto.
I can't believe instructors are actually training people to do this :?
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:12 pm
Location: Brisbane southside

re

Post by Grantw »

Interesting how different forums have totally different ideas!
09 Mitsu Evo X Mr
09 Suzuki Swift
09 VW 190kw Tiguan
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 1:21 pm
Location: "Shit"ney

Post by Noisey »

:shock:

Holy Crap - they call it angel gear for a good reason.
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Geraldton, Western Australia

Post by Adomw »

Noisey wrote::shock:

Holy Crap - they call it angel gear for a good reason.


I'm with you Noisey

Do autos really have so little engine breaking that someone would opt for neutral?? I've backed down a very steep hill in an auto Prado (no I wasn't going to stray) and it didn't want to run away in 4L mind you TD prado have lower t/case gears about 2.8:1

Ado
(would rather push a manual than drive an auto)
JK Unlimited Rubicon
2" lift
Dual locked, 1:4 crawler gears, swaybar disconnect
Stock and loving it
Mods to come
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by 4runna »

It surprised me too, I cant imagine this being very good for the bands and clutches in the box, let alone being the wrong direction if u need to give it a stab of throttle to get out of a sticky situation!!! :shock:

Rob.

Bitsamissin wrote:I would not want to reverse down a steep hill in neutral in ANY vehicle manual or auto.
I can't believe instructors are actually training people to do this :?
96 Paj 2.8 TD 2" lift, Snorkel, LR Tank, Dual Batt, winch, 32 MTRs, RT tent and rack, polyairs etc
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Sth Gippy

Post by Neilj »

I could'nt read the article as the forum was closed when I went there , but I THINK I get the gist of it.


It was'nt posted on April 1st, was it?
It's time for my pill!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests