Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Ratio Mismatch

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Ratio Mismatch

Post by ISUZUROVER »

I know Sam posted a similar topic a while ago but that didn't really answer my question...

I have a 4.7:1 front and rear diff at the moment (Rover & Dana60/Salisbury respectively). I want to put a Hilux centre in the front for added CW&P strength. The closest ratio is 4.88:1. Do you guys see any problems with a 4.88:1 front and 4.7 rear. Part time 4x4 so only used off road. I know the usual acceptable difference is .1 and I think it would be worse having the lower ratio on the front as the back would always be trying to push the front along faster - maybe causing more rear wheelspin??????

Any thoughts???????
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

It's fine - if you want to run different sized tyres :finger:
Or if you don't want your transfer case any more :twisted:
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

This very topic came up on Trail Talk about a year or so ago.
All the tech guru's and engineers all agreed that the drivetrain can handle a 5% diff ratio mismatch for part time 4x4 set ups. I make yours at a 4.7% variation so according to them it falls within their agreed tolerance.
But if I were you I would talk to a few automotive gear places first and get their opinions.
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 10:25 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Roktruk »

Technically, if your driveshafts are doing 1000rpm, then the rear wheels are rotating at 208rpm(4.88) and your front wheels are rotating at 213 rpm (4.7) i.e. the front tyre is trying to spin faster (this is around 30km/hr in high range for a 33")

For a 33" inch tyre, approx rolling diameter is 2.36 metres, therefore every minute, the front tyre travels forward 502m, and the rear tyre travels 490m, a difference of 12m, every minute!! Now the wheels obviously can't travel like this, so something has to give. On greasy mud, the wheels will spin ok, but any hard packed surface will start to cause wind up, skipping, funny steering..... This can result in locking into 4wd at best, at worst.... BANG!$$$$$


Depending on the vehicles use, you may find this acceptable, but in my opinion is only going to cause grief in the long term

Roktruk :D
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

Post by big red »

seems to me that it would make your rig less capable, before you even start up the hill two of your wheels are spinning ! :(
[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests