Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Tyre & Rim Sizes - Opinions ?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Cairns, FNQ

Tyre & Rim Sizes - Opinions ?

Post by Mick_n_Sal »

Hey guys, was just looking at tyres to go on the middy - curious to know peoples thoughts. 33x12.5/r15 or 285-75/16

Either way I would have to buy rims. I've been told that 16" tyres generally have stronger sidewalls and resist staking better.

Would you choose 15s or 16s, and why?

Mick_n_Sal
HIS: '90 FJ73 Awaiting funds for mods
OURS: '00 HZ105 Cruiser - HIDs, GPS, UHF, LF240s, BFG MTs, BB, Steps, Outback Drawers . . . .
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Really just a matter of personal preference. I prefer 16's (and have 285/75/16 MTR's). I think 16's may be easier to keep on the rim without beadlocks and may be a bit harder to stake because of less sidewall area, but probably not much of a difference.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 3054
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by hottiemonster »

also 16" tims and tyres are dearer generally.
Gq ute new built
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Of the two sizes you list the 16" tyres have significantly higher load ratings. What this means in the real world, I'm not sure... :oops:

Scott
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: Tyre & Rim Sizes - Opinions ?

Post by bogged »

15's are cheaper for tires AND rims..
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Perth

Post by steel »

285/75R16 = 11.2 inches wide. 33/12.5/15 = 12.5 inches wide.
Similar rolling diameter though.
33/12.5/15 has taller sidewall which allows increased lengthening of tyre
's foot print whan deflated
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:57 am

Post by Ryano »

I'd go the 16".
16" tyres have a higher load rating/stronger case construction, and are more modern technology.
They also handle better on the bitumen due to less sidewall flex.
They will handle offroad better due to the stronger carcass strength. Performance of the actual pattern will be the same as long as you are comparing apples with apples.
They will deflate and have similar "Bagging" qualities, just at different pressures than the 15" (Unless you are running sub 10psi ;) ).

I recently had the opportunity to drive a new Patrol with 17x9 rims and 33x12.50R17 Mickey Thompson Radial Claws.
We took it up to the Gulf travelled through plenty of varying conditions. At the right pressures it went everywhere....sand, dirt, scrub the lot. :twisted:
Thing that really stood out for me was the on bitumen handling of the vehicle. Really clung to the road. No tyre roll to speak of.
So my opinion.....go the 16" even with a slightly dearer price tag.
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:38 pm
Location: Darwin

Post by Sixty »

also there is more room around the brakes -more airflow, easier to clean,etc
Luv the sound of a diesel,
especially a Chev 6.2!
Its GONE.........Replaced by a qik HDJ105.

The bigger the boy, the bigger the TOY!!
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 3:40 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by 4Speed »

I've been told 35"s on 15" rims are now in the hwy patrol book of defects, has anyone else heard that?
Maybe I should just ring the RTA.
God made reverse for tailgaters!!
But the white light is me!!
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

4Speed wrote:I've been told 35"s on 15" rims are now in the hwy patrol book of defects.


Shane h that runs the GQ list, he got defected for a seat that was ripped, a brake pedal rubber that was worn, SPONGY BRAKES (how the fuck would they know without drivin' the truck?) and a cracked screen..

Dangerous vehicle then 4 defects - he was told to get it towed...
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

On this topic, which would weigh more for the same patch on the ground? A 33 on a 15" rim or a 33 on a 16" rim? In other words, does an inch of rim weigh more, or an inch of tyre?

I would probably go for the lighter option. To my mind that is the difference that would have the most obvious benefit, as opposed to theories about sidewall strength, beadlocking etc that noone could agree on.

Jason
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

chimpboy wrote:On this topic, which would weigh more for the same patch on the ground? A 33 on a 15" rim or a 33 on a 16" rim? In other words, does an inch of rim weigh more, or an inch of tyre?

I would probably go for the lighter option. To my mind that is the difference that would have the most obvious benefit, as opposed to theories about sidewall strength, beadlocking etc that noone could agree on.

Jason


Since there is a HUGE variation in both tyre and rim construction (and hence weight) you cannot answer that unless you were comparing the exact same brands of rims and tyres in 15 and 16.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests