Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

31s to 33s.....noticable loss in performance?

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

31s to 33s.....noticable loss in performance?

Post by mabsydney »

I have 33's on my GQ TD42, but lately I've been thinking about putting it back on 31's. It's basically a tourer and I don't need 33's most of the time, so I was thinking I could be better off with 31's as it would give me better acceleration and pull up highway hills better.

I've never driven my truck on 31's though, so maybe I'm kidding myself and the difference wouldn't be that great. It is a TD42 afterall, pretty slow.

What do you guys think?
1989 Nissan Safari TD42 with stuff
User avatar
Nev
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Nev »

well its about a 6% reduction and from my experience with trying different sized tyres...yes you will notice the difference but it won't be overly great.
01 GU Patrol 4.2TD Wagon
JBE
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 2:39 pm
Location: Sydney

.

Post by JBE »

I have a GQ LWB TD42 as well. When I had 4.1:1 diff ratios, I compared 31s vs 31s on one weekend. I did it to determine if I should upgrade to a 4.3:1 diff ratio. In town, the difference was close to none, but there were a couple of situations, where I thought it made a difference like long inclines where I could not shift into 3rd (Mt Victoria) or 4th gear (Putty Road) were not a problem any more.

I personally think, it takes the edge off the pain driving a 2.3ton gutless diesel truck.

Cheers
Joachim
User avatar
Emo
Posts: 4137
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 12:46 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by Emo »

If you don't need to run 33's then I'd go back to 31's.
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Not only a situation of "less go" but also fuel economy will suffer, braking will suffer, and so will handling.


I would expect it to be more than 6% worse though, due to rotational inertia and other such issues. The weight difference in tyres is waaaaay more than 6%...



Having said that, I'm running 33"s and it depends on your diff ratios. There's a hill I drive regularly which is better with the 33's on because I can hold 4th rather than shift to 5th and then bog down...
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

Arnt 32's std? or the splitties that i think measure around this size?

Nic
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:14 pm
Location: away from the hussle and bussle

Post by The Conductor »

Have done this exact same experiment. Lost a little bit when you put your foot down in 5th gear. I didn't do it long enough to get a good indication of fuel economy but i would think it is much of a muchness considering that it would take a little more to to get it up and moving but once up at cruizing speed should rev lower with the bigger rolling diametre of the tyres and therefore us less fuel.
Clint.
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

The Conductor wrote:Have done this exact same experiment. Lost a little bit when you put your foot down in 5th gear. I didn't do it long enough to get a good indication of fuel economy but i would think it is much of a muchness considering that it would take a little more to to get it up and moving but once up at cruizing speed should rev lower with the bigger rolling diametre of the tyres and therefore us less fuel.
The extra height effectively increases your frontal area, and extra width of the tyres can add to aerodynamic drag too.

When I went from 31s to 33s my economy suffered - except one cool day cruising on flat ground with a tail wind. :roll:

If you don't need the extra clearance for offroad work, run the 31s.

Scott
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: 31s to 33s.....noticable loss in performance?

Post by bogged »

mabsydney wrote:I have 33's on my GQ TD42, but lately I've been thinking about putting it back on 31's. It's basically a tourer and I don't need 33's most of the time, so I was thinking I could be better off with 31's as it would give me better acceleration and pull up highway hills better.

I've never driven my truck on 31's though, so maybe I'm kidding myself and the difference wouldn't be that great. It is a TD42 afterall, pretty slow.

What do you guys think?
When I went from 31's to 33's I noticed a noticeable diffrence in Brakes, power, and fuel.

See if ya can borrow a set of 31's for a week see what you find for yourself, everyone will have different results depending how they drive
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:03 am
Location: MELBOURNE

Post by rochrd »

cool so if take off my 36'' and replace them with the stocks,
i might be able to get it on its side....
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

Thanks for the replies if I can sell the 33's I'm thinking of fitting a set of 265/75 MTZs soon. Otherwise I'll have to wait til the STTs wear out and the rate they are wearing that will be a while!
1989 Nissan Safari TD42 with stuff
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:35 am
Location: Sydney

Post by mabsydney »

nicbeer wrote:Arnt 32's std? or the splitties that i think measure around this size?

Nic
Yeah you are right actually and 265/75R16 is close to 32" give or take. So I guess I mean 32's really.
1989 Nissan Safari TD42 with stuff
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 152 guests