Page 1 of 1

235/85r16 instead of 31s?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:01 pm
by zookimal
I'm about to do new rims and rubber under my Sierra project and I'm considering going to a 235/85r16 instead of 31x10.5x15s.

I realise the price difference makes a lot of people go 15s but I like the idea of the taller, narrower 32 inch tyre.

My question is will the 16 be too stiff in the sidewall to work under the zook? MT/R for example? No beadlocks at double figure pressures etc. On road and in the bush.

Until recently I hadn't considered the 16 but I think I prefer it unless anyone has any obvious issues.

Cheers,

15s or 16s ?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:00 pm
by want33s
:D

15s or 16s ?

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:03 pm
by want33s
:D

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:17 am
by Eddy
Most 235/85 16s are 8 ply rating or more, so they are going to be fairly stiff on a zook, but they will be stronger than the average 31/15 for that reason.

I've only ever had them on patrols and my 8 tonne truck. They certainly did the job in 8 ply rating on my old 1700kg G60, and the Leyland truck with it's 10 ply rating set was ok too.

Gunna be a case of "suck it and see" I guess.

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:39 pm
by zookimal
I thought as much.

Any words of advice from those older, wiser ones who've spoken of 7.50s or tall, narrow tyres in the past? :D

Gwagensteve? Grimbo?

Any advice appreciated.

Cheers,

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:03 pm
by zookimal
This is the desired result, courtesy of another site. Translation anyone?

Image

235/85R16 Zook

Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:18 am
by Eddy
askmwc wrote: Any words of advice from those older, wiser ones who've spoken of 7.50s or tall, narrow tyres in the past?
When I first started in fourbies we had a wide selection of tyres.
There were an assortment of 750s etc (including tractor type) , or 31s. (Goodyear wranglers or BFG all terrain T/A)

For a while we all jumped on the 31" bandwagon, and then went back to the 750s

Some of us went to the 825s and 900s as well

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:14 am
by zookimal
Thanks Eddy.

Not sure which way I'll go then. :?

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:33 pm
by zookimal
Bump :armsup:

Thinking just 31s on 15s

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:39 pm
by cj
I like the 235/85R16 idea myself. That's what's going on my Vit next. I've tried 31x10.50's and 7.50-16's as well as some old 33x9.50's and I reckon the 235/85R16's will be the ideal compromise at this point for me. Also mugginsmoo on here has gone that way on his Jimny......50mm of suspension lift and some cutting :D :cool: I've seen the same on a Vit and a GV too now with just suspension and cutting and it looks good without screaming look at me! That and I'd rather have the extra ground clearance.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:52 pm
by grimbo
I'd go the tall narrow route as I have in the past. I just reckon they work better on a Sierra (and for that matter on my patrol's too 33 x 10.50 instead of 33 x 12.50)

The tall skinny puts less strain on components, is easier to fit and in conditions found in Victoria seem to work better than the wider tyre.