Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Simex 12.5 vs 11.5

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Chch-NZ

Simex 12.5 vs 11.5

Post by Clarkie »

Looking at getting a set of simex 35's ET's just after some feed back on the 2 different widths 11.5 and the 12.5.

most of the winch guys seam to run the 11.5 and some 10.5 I'm guessing cause they dig better in greasy conditions?

I have a LWB GQ which is quite a heavy unit,is the 12.5 better suited as a all rounder on a heavy vehicle?would be better on soft surfaces pea gravel/sand etc less likly to sink/dig there way to china :cool:

Does the 12.5 drive better on road?do they last any longer being tripple block?

Thanks for any advice

Shane
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by GQ Bear »

Do a search, it's been mentioned on here before i'm sure.

I run the 11.5's and they're groulse. From memory there was a few comments made about the third centre row actually reducing the tyres self-cleaning effectiveness and handling more like a std mud terrain on rocks and in mud.

Flame suit off so go for your lives if i'm wrong :finger:
[color=violet]G[/color][color=white]O[/color][color=yellow] S[/color][color=blue]T[/color][color=yellow]O[/color][color=white]R[/color][color=violet]M[/color]
Premiers 1999, 2007, 2009
Spoon 2010
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:50 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by macca81 »

wider is quieter onroad, has more tread on the ground so offers mor traction, can 'float' across mud more easily with momentum.

narrower tracks easier onroad and has lighter steering (hardly noticable after a cpl days driving), digs down more in mud to bite into harder stuff underneath.



my pref is for wider, but its down to personal more than not
[quote="Barnsey"]
Bronwyn Bishop does it for me.[/quote]
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Bell Post Hill, Vic

Post by patrolpaul »

I run the 12.5 and love them on a lwb gq. It comes down to personal choice.
[size=167][color=red]Have Fun, Play Hard, Be Safe[/color]

[color=green]Paul[/color][/size]

[size=75][color=blue]GQ LWB, Lockers, 36" Simex, High mount with Plasma, Turbo, 5" lift[/color][/size]
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

i have found the wider the better.
cant coment on simex personally as i have never owned a set yet bu a few mates have and they all have 12.5
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:49 am
Location: NZ

Post by nzdarin »

How long is a piece of string? The 12.5's don't work in NZ which is why almost all comp trucks are using 11.5 or 10.5. If dry then I would think the 12.5 would be better, but I've only used 11.5 and 10.5.
93 Nissan Pathfinder / Terrano Turboed VH45, GQ Trans and T-case, coil overs, hydraulic winch and fair bit of other stuff. (Currently a pile of parts in the workshop)
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:34 am
Location: Croydon, Victoria

Post by TRobbo »

nzdarin wrote:How long is a piece of string?
Why does everyone ask this question? It is twice the distance of the measurement from the centre to one end. :onfire:
Warn - Dont leave home without it
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Melbourne, looking at the hills for snow

Post by LOCKEE »

I have had both on my GQ LWB and prefer the 12.5. Drives better allround.

Faster out of corner, much nicer on road. Can't tell the difference in the mud but everywhere else is much better suited to the heavy GQ.
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Chch-NZ

Post by Clarkie »

I'm going to price up the 35/12.5/15 see how much more than the 11.5 they are.
Going by tyre web site the 35/12.5 is only 3-4mm smaller than the 36/12.5 which would keep me in 33-35" class in club events,no point being top class with a gutless big tank :D

Cheers for input guys
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Gold coast QLD

Post by Madmac »

i have the 35x10.5r15s and have been happy with them, im not really into mud though, ive used them more on rocks and loose shaly stuff, ive run them in a few comps and they have worked pretty well for me,
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:49 am
Location: NZ

Post by nzdarin »

Clarkie wrote:I'm going to price up the 35/12.5/15 see how much more than the 11.5 they are.
Going by tyre web site the 35/12.5 is only 3-4mm smaller than the 36/12.5 which would keep me in 33-35" class in club events,no point being top class with a gutless big tank :D

Cheers for input guys
So the tyre size isn't done on actual size? Sounds like a pretty unfair way of measuring something. A 35x11.5 Simex is 35.5" and a 35x10.5 is 34.9. Most competition rules require tyres to fit through a gauge to qualify. ie Winch Challenge rules is 36.5x13.5 and a 36x13.5 Swamper Irok will fit if on 7" wheels.
93 Nissan Pathfinder / Terrano Turboed VH45, GQ Trans and T-case, coil overs, hydraulic winch and fair bit of other stuff. (Currently a pile of parts in the workshop)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests