Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

285/75/16s

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica/(Haiti)

285/75/16s

Post by Lawrence »

Can 285/75 16s' fit under the gq without a lift?
89 gq dx. bone stock --- for now.
Posts: 4494
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Golden Square

Post by turps »

They may rub on the flares slightly. Also on max uptravel they will rub on the inside of the rear wheel arch.
I had them with a small lift on a swb gq and found them to be a very good size.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

33s arent they?
didnt gq come out with 31s standard?
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 4494
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Golden Square

Post by turps »

j-top paj wrote:33s arent they?
didnt gq come out with 31s standard?
285/75R16=33x11.2R16

And yes GQ's came out with 31's on a 15"rim plus a couple of other sizes. They also came out with a narrow small tyre about the same size as a hilux, 29" I think. PLus 235/85R16 on 16x6 rims which where also fitted to Navars.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

turps wrote:PLus 235/85R16 on 16x6 rims which where also fitted to Navars.
which are close to 32's... 31.72 in

personally I dont think you would do it. I had 33's with a 2-3-4-6+inch lifts, and they are nice with a 2inch lift.
User avatar
RN
A speed camera would have prevented that!
Posts: 15822
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Check your six.

Post by RN »

I'm running 275/16/75 road tyres under non lifted and they are fine in road driving.

Are you talking off road conditions?

Is there much of a difference between 275 and 285...?

Made bugger all when I went from 265 to 275.
I am the Nightrider! I am the chosen one. The mighty hand of vengeance, sent down to strike the unroadworthy!
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

RoadNazi wrote:
Is there much of a difference between 275 and 285...?
yeh about 10mm :lol:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica/(Haiti)

Post by Lawrence »

Yes, i was thinking off road conditions. Although two friends of mine had 90/91 gq utes and didnt have a problems, even though they use them for work (on a farm), in fairly rough offroad conditions So I imagine that the problems (if there are) would exist in the rear of the wagon.They each have Dunlop Mud rovers and swear by them.
89 gq dx. bone stock --- for now.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

RoadNazi wrote:Are you talking off road conditions?
some of us do go offroad :finger: :D
Lawrence wrote:Yes, i was thinking off road conditions. Although two friends of mine had 90/91 gq utes and didnt have a problems, even though they use them for work (on a farm), in fairly rough offroad conditions So I imagine that the problems (if there are) would exist in the rear of the wagon.They each have Dunlop Mud rovers and swear by them.
wagons and utes are totally different items in relation to suspension and clearance.. Try your mates tires on and go for a drive..
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

bogged wrote:
RoadNazi wrote:Are you talking off road conditions?
some of us do go offroad :finger: :D
ive never seen any pics of u wheeling :finger:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

j-top paj wrote:
bogged wrote:
RoadNazi wrote:Are you talking off road conditions?
some of us do go offroad :finger: :D
ive never seen any pics of u wheeling :finger:
thats coz no one will go with him..................which begs thje question, if bogged goes 4wdriving and no one see him, did he really go 4wdriving :lol:
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

:rofl:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

wagons and utes are totally different items in relation to suspension and clearance.. ???

wagons n utes are the same chassis (if coil sprung), diffs n suspension, so how are they different? Only difference is rear gaurds on the wagon.
The only prob you might have would be at full flex on the compression side the tyre might grab the outer edges of the rear gaurd or flare.
Posts: 1990
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:14 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by T_Diesel »

turps wrote:
j-top paj wrote:33s arent they?
didnt gq come out with 31s standard?
285/75R16=33x11.2R16

And yes GQ's came out with 31's on a 15"rim plus a couple of other sizes. They also came out with a narrow small tyre about the same size as a hilux, 29" I think. PLus 235/85R16 on 16x6 rims which where also fitted to Navars.
Does that mean that would make a 305/70R16 the exact equivalent to a 33/12.5 in a 15 inch rim?
Road Ranger
Posts: 10722
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:21 pm
Location: In a town near you

Post by Tiny »

T_Diesel wrote:
turps wrote:
j-top paj wrote:33s arent they?
didnt gq come out with 31s standard?
285/75R16=33x11.2R16

And yes GQ's came out with 31's on a 15"rim plus a couple of other sizes. They also came out with a narrow small tyre about the same size as a hilux, 29" I think. PLus 235/85R16 on 16x6 rims which where also fitted to Navars.
Does that mean that would make a 305/70R16 the exact equivalent to a 33/12.5 in a 15 inch rim?
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp

this link allows you tyo calculate the exact conversion, that siad just because the tyre placard says 31" or 305/75R16 it doas not mean the tyre is physicially that size
If the above post did not offend you in any way please PM me so I can try harder!!
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:21 pm

Post by yellowrunner2 »

I am running the 285/75-16 claws on a 3" lift with no issues. Standard fittment on the '93 with alloys 265/70-16 so not much diff there really
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

claws are a smaller size than true size
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: Vic

Post by Troll »

33x10.5/r15 BFG AT's for city drivin. and 285/75/r16 BFG MT's for weekend work. 95 GQ LWB with 2 inch lift. front axle has been shifted forwards with a "Big balls offroad" spacer( about 20mm ) gives the 285/75's flare & mudguard clearance. rear flares catch when on tuff stuff but haven't snapped them yet... but they are missin a few tabs. Very happy with both tyre sizes .
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests