Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

GQ class , new winch challenge class?? updated....

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

how do you think this should be run?


with GQ's running only.
63
44%
with other brands running aswell.
61
43%
forget it stick with whats on offer now.
19
13%
 
Total votes: 143

Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

dwaynes wrote:
dwaynes wrote:Darren,
in the same vain as above can the car be dual fuel but run on petrol for the comp or would the gas need to be removed or isolated in some way?
Darren any comment on this?
imwo, I cant see you expecting people to remove gas systems, if these are going to also be daily drivers
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Lysterfield

Post by krimnl »

I dont think gas will be a problem of petrol motors, definatly a NO on diesel
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 5:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by AussieCJ7 »

I know you are all bias one eyed jap crap 4x4 supporters here but if you really wanted a one design controlled class racing it would have been worth considering the existing classes in the rest of the world

Jeepspeed in the US http://www.jeepspeed.com/ has done exactly this for off road racing (baja style) but a few minor rule mods could see the same for winch style events.

XJ sells for around 5K to 7K they have huge range of after market parts, good power to weight ratio with a EFI inline 6

I am sure there is similar events in Europe for land rover also

Werock has showed that linking into a global event has some big advantages

personally I dont think the scene in Australia is big enough for this yet but best of luck
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: forest lake BUILDING BOOTYFAB BARWORK

Post by frp88 »

krimnl wrote:
badger wrote:withis class be vic/nsw only or will there be events in qld as well?
I have spoken to David about this class, he is all for us doing it. we will make it so that these cars will fit into his standard class.
So you will be racing against other makes under the same rules in MMM winch challenge :?:
LETS GO BRONCOS
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:40 am
Location: Melb

Post by Silver GU »

Darren,

As someone building a GQ this class sounds great. A couple of questions though, just so I dont go building something I have to unbuild in order to get a race.

-Can the carby be modified in any way?
-What changes can be made to the standard ignition system?
-Can coil cabs race? as long as the compliance plate says so they are still a GQ.
-What will we be allowed to do in the way of ratios/lockers/transfer gears etc etc. Do they have to remain standard or are they open?
-Door trims are to stay. Mine where slashed when I got the car and are not checkerplate, do I have to source originals?
- Does the interior have to stay? The rooflining in mine was slashed also and was going to be removed for a cage install. The carpet will get pretty stinky after a few mud runs. i cant see it being a massive performance gain without it.
-Do you know what 'control' equipment we are going to have to use yet, bar, tyres and susp? I dont want to buy something that might have to be removed!!
-Are the wheels going to be regulated? Will Toyota offset sunraysias be a maximum offset? my thinking is this will stop crazy offset rims and wheel spacers.

Thanks for the effort to help those without a cheque book to have a race!!

Mark.
91 Mav, Now with flames!!!
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Lysterfield

Post by krimnl »

Silver GU wrote:Darren,

As someone building a GQ this class sounds great. A couple of questions though, just so I dont go building something I have to unbuild in order to get a race.

-Can the carby be modified in any way?
-What changes can be made to the standard ignition system?
-Can coil cabs race? as long as the compliance plate says so they are still a GQ.
-What will we be allowed to do in the way of ratios/lockers/transfer gears etc etc. Do they have to remain standard or are they open?
-Door trims are to stay. Mine where slashed when I got the car and are not checkerplate, do I have to source originals?
- Does the interior have to stay? The rooflining in mine was slashed also and was going to be removed for a cage install. The carpet will get pretty stinky after a few mud runs. i cant see it being a massive performance gain without it.
-Do you know what 'control' equipment we are going to have to use yet, bar, tyres and susp? I dont want to buy something that might have to be removed!!
-Are the wheels going to be regulated? Will Toyota offset sunraysias be a maximum offset? my thinking is this will stop crazy offset rims and wheel spacers.

Thanks for the effort to help those without a cheque book to have a race!!

Mark.
thanks for the feedback Mark.
Carby can be modified but must remain factory carby
Electronic ignition can be fitted (any type OK)
Coil cabs can race as long as its a coil cab from the factory
lockers and ratios in diffs and gearbox will be open
door trims ,roof linings and floor coverings must remain, smooth floors and no rooflinings have a RWC issue and door trims will help keep the 'stock' look
No control equiptment as yet
rims are unsure at the moment, would like to say open , but want to save that 3k worth of walker evans rims

will get feedback this weekend at ateco then move forward with this.
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: North West Melbourne

Post by dwaynes »

is there anything further on this?
www.mudrhino.com.au
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:01 am
Location: SPRINGMOUNTAIN BRISBANE

Post by pigletracing »

there wouldnt be too many non modified GQs left
out there,OBC tried this with a sort of factory class,
but didnt they find that some die/hard com rigs
being slightly demodified to compete, creating an
unfare advantage on the real ones..I suppose there
will always be loop holes
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

dwaynes wrote:is there anything further on this?
?
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:32 pm

Post by ats4x4dotcom »

we have been exploring an offroad class based on similar set up, using off road racing rules, and stadium racing is making a come back as well.

Perhaps if we can put heads together, i have afew suppliers who would like to be involved already as well, and the vehicles, if done right could compete in many fields over a year.

We are also looking at owning 5 and leasing them out.
Posts: 1361
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Now in a happy place.

Post by Cheezy4x4 »

I havn been reading all the posts so this may be a double up.
Are aftermarket GQ CV,s and axles OK, straight bolt it type. ???
NOW ABLE TOO SAY WHAT I WANT WITHOUT FEAR OF LOOSING SALES.
The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it.
User avatar
AJ
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Whyalla SouthOz

Post by AJ »

BUMP

Any updates/progress?
Andrew - 1999 GU ST 4.2Turbodiesel Wagon
Whyalla SouthOz

My website: http://www.touring4x4.com/
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:31 am

Post by std80 »

any updateds or pics of the proto??
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: outer east Melb.

Post by MUD EMPIRE »

Once the rules for such a comp class are finalised, then the people that enter will have their
individual driving/navi talent on display.......and the best will win.

Who cares what the rules are, so long as everyone is on a level playingfield........

I hope that it will take away the serious undertones that the current competition is plagued with. (caus of $$$$)

GQ class is the way to get more numbers involved in off road.......
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:31 am

Post by std80 »

Gone Quiet??
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

std80 wrote:Gone Quiet??
been a while now, anywhere with this, or the doe doe?
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:29 am
Location: Right behind you and coming fast!

Post by cooki_monsta »

as far as my knowledge goes this is still active! just being planned etc still
Maverick. Unlocked on 35's MOTTO: Lock, Stomp & Hold on
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Lysterfield

Post by krimnl »

cooki_monsta wrote:as far as my knowledge goes this is still active! just being planned etc still
correct Greg , just been busy with work ect.

CCDA is taking suggestions for new rules and we have discussed a new class. something like off road racing that has a production class and a modified class. these classes should be run together and production class should be looked on as a class and not a stepping stone to the modified class.

A couple of ideas have been forwarded to the CCDA , this is some basic notes that i have put together and open for discussion. If you think you can do better then start typing and send your thoughts to the CCDA .



GQ CLASS RACING
Or production class racing


1: BODY SPECIFICATION
Open to any make or model
All cars must be road registered
Must retain original body type .ie: wagon must not be cut down into a ute. This is determined by whats on the compliance plate.
No fibreglass replacement panels, all panels including bonnet must be steel.
Guards can be cut to allow clearance for the bigger tyres
Rear ¼ panel lowers can be trimmed behind the rear wheel
All glass must be retained in the body
Maximum 2â€
Last edited by krimnl on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

did I miss suspension lift limit?

Edit: Std engines only for either petrol or diesel
does this mean standard fitment to car, or standard, not fully worked - eg can you run a 4.8/4.5 GU donk


sounds good, there will be complaints about no cut downs, no turbo and no glass panels, but keeps costs down.
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by mikmav »

what about lockers ? aftermarket or factory or just none ?
--
98 GU.. front locker, cheezy sliders, 33's, winch etc.. .... long shopping list.
User avatar
cj
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cj »

As it says it is open to any Make and model, how many vehicles have commercially available high mount winch front bars available to them? If they don't then does this mean bars can be modified and if so, how far?

Gearing changes to diffs and transfer cases?

Lockers?

Exhaust mods?

Batteries?

Upgraded alternators?

Can diffs be shaved?
[quote="4WD Stuff"]
I haven't quoted Grimbo because nobody takes him seriously :finger: :finger: :finger: :finger: [/quote]
Posts: 1644
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: Hawkesbury, Sydney

Post by CWBYUP »

I didnt really take much notice of this as last time I looked T/D were out.

Now this is in...

krimnl wrote: Diesel can be turbo charged but not intercooler


I'll be following with great interest.

I think its a great idea.

Good luck with it all and make sure you let us know if you need a hand with anything.

Nick
[quote="Vulcanised"]more grunt than a row of drunk girls at a B&S ball!
[/quote]
Posts: 1443
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by vanbox »

rules about LPG will be needed to. especially for diesels.

PAUL
MUD BEERS and MAYHEM

DURAMAX POWERED GU
Posts: 7230
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by MissDrew »

I think those rules are very good.
Only one I don't agree with is the winch must be a high mount.
Lots of people don't want to spend big dollars on a winch. I don't see a problem with having a low mount. You can still have just as many dramas with high mounts. Infact they burn out motors a lot more then low mounts do.

Plasma is another thing that just adds to the cost and is an un-needed extra cost. There is nothing wrong with using cable if the safety measures are seen to like dampers and gloves and these are in the rules. Cable is just heavier and there for a disadvantage to those running it.
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Cossie »

Sounds spot on to me.

+1 on Guts' comments though re: lowmounts and steel cable.

I assume aftermarket/strengthened tierods/lower control arms etc are all ok?
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:45 am
Location: hell on earth

Post by trackbandit »

rules should reflect the real world

navi's should cary chainsaws and be expected to use 'em

more tracks-------less greenies :D
treechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsawtreechainsaw
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: Lysterfield

Post by krimnl »

Guts wrote:I think those rules are very good.
Only one I don't agree with is the winch must be a high mount.
Lots of people don't want to spend big dollars on a winch. I don't see a problem with having a low mount. You can still have just as many dramas with high mounts. Infact they burn out motors a lot more then low mounts do.

Plasma is another thing that just adds to the cost and is an un-needed extra cost. There is nothing wrong with using cable if the safety measures are seen to like dampers and gloves and these are in the rules. Cable is just heavier and there for a disadvantage to those running it.
the issue with low mounts is they are so slow. these cars will be running in the same stages as the challenge cars , they need to be as fast as we can get them without going over the top. the high mount with 12volt and a 6hp motor is still very fast.
The Plasma is a saftey item. I think we will see all steel cable banned from comps soon. It has been in NZ and is being pushed here.
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 7:19 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by Sandy Rut »

krimnl wrote: 3: SUSPENSION
What about air bumpstops?
krimnl wrote: 4: DIFFS
Factory fitted diff housings must remain
So does this mean no GU into GQ?
krimnl wrote: 6: STEERING
No word on GU box onto GQ - does this mean that this would be ok?
[quote="Yom"]
Some people believe GQ's are overhyped shitboxes.[/quote]
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:29 am
Location: Right behind you and coming fast!

Post by cooki_monsta »

Sandy Rut wrote:
krimnl wrote: 3: SUSPENSION
What about air bumpstops?
krimnl wrote: 4: DIFFS
Factory fitted diff housings must remain
So does this mean no GU into GQ?
krimnl wrote: 6: STEERING
No word on GU box onto GQ - does this mean that this would be ok?
3. air bump stops should be ok i think
4. diffs must be FACTORY FITMENT so no, gu diffs wont be ok
6. steering is still open so i cant see gu boxes being a problem
Maverick. Unlocked on 35's MOTTO: Lock, Stomp & Hold on
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 10:29 am
Location: Everything 4WD, 86 Camms Rd Cranbourne

Post by GUJohnno »

bogged wrote:did I miss suspension lift limit?

Edit: Std engines only for either petrol or diesel
does this mean standard fitment to car, or standard, not fully worked - eg can you run a 4.8/4.5 GU donk


sounds good, there will be complaints about no cut downs, no turbo and no glass panels, but keeps costs down.
krimnl wrote: 2: ENGINE & GEARBOX
Diesel can be turbo charged but not intercooler

3: SUSPENSION
suspension lift is open
My club
www.vfwdc.com
My store
Everything 4WD
86 Camms Road Cranbourne
www.everything4wd.com.au
sales@everything4wd.com.au
Phone: 03 59955055
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests