Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

ASCC rules for 2004

Post all your Competition and Event info here.

Moderator: evanstaniland

Post Reply
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

ASCC rules for 2004

Post by big red »

[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

Post by big red »

just for your info, silverstone mt117 are not aussie standards approved but swampers,boggers, kreepy krawlers, mudzillas claws and centipedes are approved.
[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 3:31 pm

Post by Strange Rover »

I like this one:

In the production class vehicle specs we have

1. SUSPENSION.
a. All vehicles entering this class should retain relatively standard suspension.


But at the end of that section we have

Vehicles with leaf to coil spring conversions may be admitted to competition if complying with suspension height restrictions. Prior approval must be obtained.


Looks like Glen is writing special rules to allow Noddy into production class again :roll:

I guess that some production cars are just more production than others.

Sam
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 3:31 pm

Post by Strange Rover »

big red wrote:just for your info, silverstone mt117 are not aussie standards approved but swampers,boggers, kreepy krawlers, mudzillas claws and centipedes are approved.


Are you sure that swampers and boggers are Aust Standard approved because its my understanding that they are not (along with the MT117). I would love to see proof that says otherwise.

Sam
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

Post by big red »

i asked glen if swampers were approved and he told me most of the tyres were approved but the silverstones were not.
probably doesnt mean they are legal to use on my truck [speed or load rating ? ] even with the legal size.
shane
[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:09 pm
Location: BRISBANE

Post by v8grunt »

easy fix for Production class entry Rules, From here on "production" will be called " UNLOCKED CLASS " how easy was that no more spliting hairs on this rule. The main points for this class is 33" tyre size and no lockers. 4" spring lift leaves plenty of scope for mods in this class. If a competitor turns up to comp with a vehicle not approved by rules, don't cry unfair, check with me first if you have any doubt.

All approved tyres carry a standards symbol for compliance to Australian standards, can be either D.O.T code E1 or E2 code OR JATMA code. these standards are the same as AUSSIE standards and is excepted by all states in Aust. Some of the early swampers did not have a D.O.T code but the later ones should have this on the side wall. the Australian Rim & Tyre Ass standards manual has all the info on this subject.

And just for the record Noddy was informed that for 2004 modified was the only class for entry allowed for this vehicle.

Remember girls and guys we don't play for sheep stations and fun is the name of the game.

glen
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 0 guests